- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***
Posted on 4/10/20 at 11:02 pm to borotiger
Posted on 4/10/20 at 11:02 pm to borotiger
quote:
This didn't happen. Like, at all.
It actually kinda did. Dr helen chu is the doctor that did it. They were running a flu study and started testing samples for COVID-19 bc they felt it had to have spread some in the area. They found a positive or two almost immediately but couldn’t even notify the subjects bc they weren’t supposed to be testing. The notified the state public health dept.
[link=https://theweek.com/speedreads/901405/seattle-lab-uncovered-washingtons-coronavirus-outbreak-only-after-defying-federal-regulators]LINK[/link]
quote:
State health officials joined Chu in asking the CDC and Food and Drug Administration to waive privacy rules and allow clinical tests in a research lab, citing the threat of significant loss of life. The CDC and FDA said no. "We felt like we were sitting, waiting for the pandemic to emerge," Chu told the Times. "We could help. We couldn't do anything."
They held off for a couple of weeks, but on Feb. 25, Chu and her colleagues "began performing coronavirus tests, without government approval," the Times reports. They found a positive case pretty quickly, and after discussing the ethics, they told state health officials, who confirmed the next day that a teenager who hadn't traveled abroad had COVID-19 — and the virus had likely been spreading undetected throughout the Seattle area for weeks. Later that day, the CDC and FDA told Chu and her colleagues to stop testing, then partially relented, and the lab found several more cases. On Monday night, they were ordered to stop testing again.
This post was edited on 4/10/20 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 4/10/20 at 11:14 pm to Roscoe
quote:
I thought China didn’t report its first death until the second week of January. If that’s the case, why would anyone in the US have known about this in December?
US Intelligence knew something was up in late November LINK - National Review
If the the New York Times wrote about in January 6, government officials knew before them.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 11:51 pm to rds dc
I hope this damn thing peaks soon so we can start to see it decline.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 4:55 am to Hogwall Jackson
Just thought I would pop in and say that I being retested today at 9am because I am doing well enough to go to work if I test negative. I think the virus is whipped and I expect a negative test. I am so ready to leave the freaking house. Also anxious to donate my plasma.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 5:53 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
So we're in agreement that it is trump's position, on the advice of his various advisers that staying at home right now is the best course of action
To a certain extent...my issues lie more so with local govts and picking winners and losers
But the time for lockdown has passed... there are way too many places barely scathed by this. frick, if you take NYC out of the equation or even just make their numbers on par with other major cities (LA, SF, Hou) this virus is almost half of what it is.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 7:26 am to Lsut81
Yep. If you take away all the places where the virus is killing a lot of people, then it really isn't killing very many people.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 7:29 am to Commander Data
quote:
Just thought I would pop in and say that I being retested today at 9am because I am doing well enough to go to work if I test negative. I think the virus is whipped and I expect a negative test. I am so ready to leave the freaking house. Also anxious to donate my plasma.
Good luck to you, sir!
Posted on 4/11/20 at 7:35 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Yep. If you take away all the places where the virus is killing a lot of people, then it really isn't killing very many people.
Learn to read dipshit...
Posted on 4/11/20 at 7:40 am to Lsut81
quote:
They’re too busy getting their 15m of fame. They don’t even want to acknowledge that an FDA approved drug is ok to take bc they want this thing to drag on so they can continue to be on tv.
Thank god Trump isn’t going to listen to them and is going to listen to the execs who run this country.
yikes
Posted on 4/11/20 at 7:47 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
yikes
Great response... think you got a full thought in there.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 9:14 am to Lsut81
Is today or tomorrow the day the US passes Italy in total death?
Posted on 4/11/20 at 9:24 am to Lonnie Utah
Today
ETA: we passed them
ETA: we passed them
This post was edited on 4/11/20 at 9:50 am
Posted on 4/11/20 at 10:02 am to JohnnyKilroy
US Military - 3366 cases, 13 deaths, nCFR 0.39%.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 10:05 am to BRIllini07
quote:
US Military
quote:
13 deaths
What’s the story here? Assuming they aren’t obese or old......
Posted on 4/11/20 at 10:06 am to ashy larry
quote:
US Intelligence knew something was up in late November
That unsourced ABC story (apparently also run by nationalreview.com) has been refuted by the director of the intelligence agency in question.
This post was edited on 4/11/20 at 10:06 am
Posted on 4/11/20 at 10:23 am to S1C EM
quote:
What’s the story here? Assuming they aren’t obese or old......
That they just died because of the virus
Posted on 4/11/20 at 10:32 am to wdhalgren
To think we didn't hear chatter on the wire early on is naive. The NSA is so deep in digital monitoring that it's almost impossible that alarm bells didn't start going off at Ft. Meade as digital scanners started picking up medical data in China. Whether that message was relayed up the flagpole is another question, but someone in or working for our government knew about this long before word got out of China.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 10:59 am to Scruffy
quote:
Fauci, the lead medical expert on this, called the millions of unemployed an “inconvenience”.
We have a new set of skeptics in this thread; those who implicitly trust medical bureaucrats to run the country while denying or minimizing the economic risk of what is occuring here and around the world. They believe, apparently, that you can shut down massive economies for months on end, then crank it back up if we see any signs of real trouble. Honestly, this is much more disturbing than those who denied the virus' impact altogether.
This is part (a small part, unfortunately) of the problem with printing money to pay the bills; it leads people to believe that economic disruptions are manageable, or even minor, and thus can be ignored right now for the purpose of preventing excess virus deaths. If our government had immediately levied a two trillion dollar tax to pay for this "stimulus" (so far, more to come) instead of having the federal reserve create that amount out of thin air in the last month, then economic costs would suddenly be a much bigger part of the discussion. Instead, we've come to view debt monetization as a free lunch which obviates the need to consider real economic costs in any decision making process.
And if people were explicitly told (and understood) how dependent we've become on just in time global supply chains that are currently faltering all the way back to base material production, they would be clamoring to open this back up ASAP. But for some reason, these things are seldom discussed and never emphasized by our otherwise strident and emphatic news media, and that's the most worrisome thing of all.
This post was edited on 4/11/20 at 11:43 am
Posted on 4/11/20 at 11:05 am to Lsut81
quote:
The financial and subsequent health impacts of delaying more and more will outweigh the potential of a few more people getting it.
This has been my point. We’ve reached the point of diminishing returns
Posted on 4/11/20 at 11:08 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
To think we didn't hear chatter on the wire early on is naive.
You just accepted an anonymous source defining when the alarm bells started going off and when that was picked up and reported on by our intelligence organizations. And ignored the other side of that story, which was that the director of that agency broke protocol and publicly denied that story because he said it was important to be transparent during this episode.
I don't know the truth, but I know now who is speaking transparently and who is using unnamed sources. I also know that I haven't seen any convincing evidence that this was well underway or even identified as a novel virus far enough back to accept the story as proof of anything. I try to consider all of those factors before I form my opinions about what happened and when. So which of us is being naive?
This post was edited on 4/11/20 at 11:15 am
Popular
Back to top



0









