- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Congress won’t let us have nuth’N. Starting in 2026 say goodbye to most THC products.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:59 pm to AncientTiger
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:59 pm to AncientTiger
Buy THC stocks now while they're low. They're just gearing up to buy up dirt cheap stocks before it drops to level 3.
1
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:04 pm to GeauxOCDP
quote:
Buy THC stocks now while they're low. They're just gearing up to buy up dirt cheap stocks before it drops to level 3.
Say more
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:04 pm to JohnnyKilroy
I’m pretty sure the seltzers and all of the legal hemp derived gummies, flower, and vapes were labeled/marketed as delta 9
Technically you might be right but not colloquially
No one refers to real marijuana as “delta 9”
Technically you might be right but not colloquially
No one refers to real marijuana as “delta 9”
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:07 pm to Jake88
I just went down a rabbit hole trying to get an answer why this provision was included in the new funding bill and who was for the restrictions and who was against the restrictions.
It's a confusing mess.
Apparently the main proponents for including the THC restrictions came from states Attorney Generals (39 AGs wrote a letter to congress earlier this week) and local and state law enforcement departments.
They claim THC provides a much cheaper and much more accessible and convenient source for inducing "psychotic episodes" (their words, not mine) which means a much greater number of young persons are using it.
One of the side issues is that young people are mixing THC oils in alcoholic beverages which is claimed to have increased the number of suicides and accidental deaths by younger users of the THC products, although I couldn't find any statistics which supported this opinion.
The main opposition to restricting THC production has come from farmers and agricultural lobbyists who have claimed the loss of growing hemp will be extremely harmful to farmers in several states.
One of the main states is Kentucky. That's why Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul was the leading senate opponent to passing the THC restriction. Paul has committed to reversing the THC restrictions in a future bill.
Also opposing the THC restrictions are retailers, including convenience stores ,who apparently sell a LOT of THC products at a profitable price mark up.
It's a confusing mess.
Apparently the main proponents for including the THC restrictions came from states Attorney Generals (39 AGs wrote a letter to congress earlier this week) and local and state law enforcement departments.
They claim THC provides a much cheaper and much more accessible and convenient source for inducing "psychotic episodes" (their words, not mine) which means a much greater number of young persons are using it.
One of the side issues is that young people are mixing THC oils in alcoholic beverages which is claimed to have increased the number of suicides and accidental deaths by younger users of the THC products, although I couldn't find any statistics which supported this opinion.
The main opposition to restricting THC production has come from farmers and agricultural lobbyists who have claimed the loss of growing hemp will be extremely harmful to farmers in several states.
One of the main states is Kentucky. That's why Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul was the leading senate opponent to passing the THC restriction. Paul has committed to reversing the THC restrictions in a future bill.
Also opposing the THC restrictions are retailers, including convenience stores ,who apparently sell a LOT of THC products at a profitable price mark up.
This post was edited on 11/13/25 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:11 pm to LSURussian
quote:
It's a confusing mess.
That’s intentional
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:18 pm to LSURussian
Look into Diageo's spending and influence
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:21 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
He runs a nursing home. Not a doctor.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:28 pm to Giantkiller
quote:I know a number of people that were able to significantly decrease or completely stop their consumption of alcohol with the use of these THC seltzers. I hope they find a resolution to this before it becomes law.
Wrong. It's solely to kill the THC beverage industry. Everything else is just fake, boogeyman bullshite.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:28 pm to GRTiger
quote:The British alcoholic beverage distributor? What about it?
Look into Diageo's spending and influence
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:29 pm to NIH
quote:
by NIH
I’d be remiss if I didn’t compliment your style. You’re everything el gaucho wants to be
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:30 pm to LSURussian
Are you really going to imply a British company can't influence American politics?
Don't frick with me. Look at what they own.
Don't frick with me. Look at what they own.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:31 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Are you really going to imply a British company can't influence American politics?
Just more proof amongst a long list showing he’s a total idiot
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:32 pm to saderade
quote:Trump signed the bill into law last night.
I hope they find a resolution to this before it becomes law.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:34 pm to Corner Pocket
Ya'll are probably the SsOB that's making everyone have to buy dashcams. 
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:35 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Trump signed the bill into law last night.
Doesn’t go into effect for 365 days and can be reversed
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:42 pm to Powerman
quote:
There seems to be somewhat of an inverse relationship between THC and alcohol consumption
So the bourbon lobby bribes were not for the benefit of society?
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:44 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Why all the big fuss?
Now the limit will be 0.4 grams per product. Just eat more gummies. Instead of a donut you will eat 10 donut holes.
It’s just a feel good measure. No real effect except for the drink makers.
Now the limit will be 0.4 grams per product. Just eat more gummies. Instead of a donut you will eat 10 donut holes.
It’s just a feel good measure. No real effect except for the drink makers.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:49 pm to dgnx6
quote:
What this will do is make it harder to grow hemp. The stuff you don’t smoke. People try and blame alcohol. Hemp isn’t the same as marijuana and I don’t know why it would affect alcohol. But it would the paper and cotton industries
You should sit this one out buddy
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:52 pm to GRTiger
quote:No, I'm asking you what did they do to influence this THC restriction? You seem to be familiar with their actions.
Are you really going to imply a British company can't influence American politics?
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:53 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:Drugs are bad, mmmkay.
As a medical doctor do you have any insight?
Page 10 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News