- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Coming soon to patrol cars: Pot breathalyzers
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:11 am
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:11 am
LINK
UC Berkeley Chemist Matt Francis has spent the last year and a half looking for pot, looking for it someplace no one has ever found it before-- in someone's user's breath.
Hound Labs has developed a breath test that can detect both alcohol, and pot when the person taking it exhales. That's important because while there are already plenty of ways to tell if someone uses marijuana, there isn't a way to know if they smoked pot recently.
"THC resides, its metabolites reside in those media for a long time -- sometimes days, sometimes even a month," explains Francis. "So you cannot use those methods very well to determine if someone has recently ingested marijuana or smoked marijuana. You can't tell how long it's been."
KTXL reports that while Dr. Francis has worked on the problem for a year and a half, Dr. Mike Lynn, the CEO of Hound Labs has been working on this for much longer.
"We have tremendous interest from not only law enforcement, employers, who are struggling with this problem, but also the cannabis industry who knows you can't be driving stoned. Everybody really accepts that," says Lynn.
Lynn argues the breathalyzer will be the best defense for legal pot users who aren't stoned at the time they are driving, but get pulled over anyway.
UC Berkeley Chemist Matt Francis has spent the last year and a half looking for pot, looking for it someplace no one has ever found it before-- in someone's user's breath.
Hound Labs has developed a breath test that can detect both alcohol, and pot when the person taking it exhales. That's important because while there are already plenty of ways to tell if someone uses marijuana, there isn't a way to know if they smoked pot recently.
"THC resides, its metabolites reside in those media for a long time -- sometimes days, sometimes even a month," explains Francis. "So you cannot use those methods very well to determine if someone has recently ingested marijuana or smoked marijuana. You can't tell how long it's been."
KTXL reports that while Dr. Francis has worked on the problem for a year and a half, Dr. Mike Lynn, the CEO of Hound Labs has been working on this for much longer.
"We have tremendous interest from not only law enforcement, employers, who are struggling with this problem, but also the cannabis industry who knows you can't be driving stoned. Everybody really accepts that," says Lynn.
Lynn argues the breathalyzer will be the best defense for legal pot users who aren't stoned at the time they are driving, but get pulled over anyway.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:12 am to HornsLife
Here it is.
Only a matter of time.
Only a matter of time.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:13 am to HornsLife
And it will be as faulty as the alcohol breathalyzer
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:16 am to HornsLife
Well this is a huge domino
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:16 am to HornsLife
I don't see how this is a bad thing.
Obviously it will be easily challengable in court, but as MJ gets wider legalization, we have to be able to test for this sort of thing as well.
I'm for MJ legalization in every state, but you shouldn't be able to drive under the influence.
Obviously it will be easily challengable in court, but as MJ gets wider legalization, we have to be able to test for this sort of thing as well.
I'm for MJ legalization in every state, but you shouldn't be able to drive under the influence.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:16 am to HornsLife
I hope they start using this as a drug test at work.
Fingers crossed.
Fingers crossed.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:17 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
but you shouldn't be able to drive under the influence.
For real. Keep the slow arse drivers who keep getting lost off the road.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:18 am to HornsLife
Just another way to get you out of your car due to bogus probable cause.
Pro Tip: grab your ID and insurance before you get out and shut the door behind you. Don't leave a reason for them to enter without your consent.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:19 am to SabiDojo
Yeah and it's all about money, not safety.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:20 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I'm for MJ legalization in every state, but you shouldn't be able to drive under the influence.
One of the biggest arguments against legalization is that you can't determine is someone is currently high from a test. If this actually works as advertised, that argument is destroyed, and there are only antiquated opinions holding it back.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to TigerNlc
quote:
I hope they start using this as a drug test at work.
Fingers crossed.
NARC LOSER
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to HornsLife
There is absolutely nothing in there that speaks on how the product actually works.
I just don't buy it until he proves it.
I just don't buy it until he proves it.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to djangochained
quote:
NARC LOSER
Quite the opposite. I want to be able to smoke weed and not fail a drug test weeks later.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
One of the biggest arguments against legalization is that you can't determine is someone is currently high from a test. If this actually works as advertised, that argument is destroyed, and there are only antiquated opinions holding it back.
It's a silly argument to begin with.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to MSMHater
"In development"
"Could be ready by next year"
He doesn't have shite except interest.
"Could be ready by next year"
He doesn't have shite except interest.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
One of the biggest arguments against legalization is that you can't determine is someone is currently high from a test. If this actually works as advertised, that argument is destroyed
This is why I am all for it.
The big question is how do you determine the legal limit? It can't be 0. Alcohol isn't 0.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:30 am to SabiDojo
quote:
It's a silly argument to begin with.
What I find hilarious is that I can wake up, pop an Adderall and a zanex, drink a litre of coffee, put in a big dip and drive around without repercussions
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:37 am to HornsLife
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 9:26 pm
Popular
Back to top

15








