Started By
Message
locked post

Coming soon to patrol cars: Pot breathalyzers

Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:11 am
Posted by HornsLife
Dallas, TX
Member since Feb 2014
786 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:11 am
LINK

UC Berkeley Chemist Matt Francis has spent the last year and a half looking for pot, looking for it someplace no one has ever found it before-- in someone's user's breath.

Hound Labs has developed a breath test that can detect both alcohol, and pot when the person taking it exhales. That's important because while there are already plenty of ways to tell if someone uses marijuana, there isn't a way to know if they smoked pot recently.


"THC resides, its metabolites reside in those media for a long time -- sometimes days, sometimes even a month," explains Francis. "So you cannot use those methods very well to determine if someone has recently ingested marijuana or smoked marijuana. You can't tell how long it's been."

KTXL reports that while Dr. Francis has worked on the problem for a year and a half, Dr. Mike Lynn, the CEO of Hound Labs has been working on this for much longer.


"We have tremendous interest from not only law enforcement, employers, who are struggling with this problem, but also the cannabis industry who knows you can't be driving stoned. Everybody really accepts that," says Lynn.

Lynn argues the breathalyzer will be the best defense for legal pot users who aren't stoned at the time they are driving, but get pulled over anyway.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
59374 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:12 am to
Here it is.

Only a matter of time.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84834 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:13 am to
And it will be as faulty as the alcohol breathalyzer
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16413 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:16 am to
Well this is a huge domino
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131654 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:16 am to
I don't see how this is a bad thing.

Obviously it will be easily challengable in court, but as MJ gets wider legalization, we have to be able to test for this sort of thing as well.

I'm for MJ legalization in every state, but you shouldn't be able to drive under the influence.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
33219 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:16 am to
I hope they start using this as a drug test at work.
Fingers crossed.
Posted by whoisnickdoobs
Lafayette
Member since Apr 2012
9352 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:17 am to
quote:

but you shouldn't be able to drive under the influence.


For real. Keep the slow arse drivers who keep getting lost off the road.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:18 am to

Just another way to get you out of your car due to bogus probable cause.

Pro Tip: grab your ID and insurance before you get out and shut the door behind you. Don't leave a reason for them to enter without your consent.
Posted by cattus
Member since Jan 2009
16044 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:19 am to
Yeah and it's all about money, not safety.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37463 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:20 am to
quote:

I'm for MJ legalization in every state, but you shouldn't be able to drive under the influence.


One of the biggest arguments against legalization is that you can't determine is someone is currently high from a test. If this actually works as advertised, that argument is destroyed, and there are only antiquated opinions holding it back.
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
19496 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:22 am to
This is a buzz kill
Posted by djangochained
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
19183 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

I hope they start using this as a drug test at work.
Fingers crossed.


NARC LOSER
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23349 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:24 am to
There is absolutely nothing in there that speaks on how the product actually works.

I just don't buy it until he proves it.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
33219 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

NARC LOSER

Quite the opposite. I want to be able to smoke weed and not fail a drug test weeks later.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84834 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

One of the biggest arguments against legalization is that you can't determine is someone is currently high from a test. If this actually works as advertised, that argument is destroyed, and there are only antiquated opinions holding it back.


It's a silly argument to begin with.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23349 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:27 am to
"In development"

"Could be ready by next year"

He doesn't have shite except interest.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:29 am to
quote:

One of the biggest arguments against legalization is that you can't determine is someone is currently high from a test. If this actually works as advertised, that argument is destroyed


This is why I am all for it.

The big question is how do you determine the legal limit? It can't be 0. Alcohol isn't 0.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:30 am to
quote:

It's a silly argument to begin with.



What I find hilarious is that I can wake up, pop an Adderall and a zanex, drink a litre of coffee, put in a big dip and drive around without repercussions
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13527 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:35 am to
Suppositories FTW
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20732 posts
Posted on 11/18/16 at 10:37 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 9:26 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram