Started By
Message

re: Chloroquine cured this flu in France at 100% success rate

Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:17 am to
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
39109 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 4:17 am to
Thanks for your time. I had this discussion with my wife yesterday. She said her hematologist would probably be aware, but that if she became ill with Carona, do not let them give her the new "miracle" cure.

Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 5:31 am to
What about if they used these drugs with a person that is in heart failure? Hey, thanks Doc.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
18755 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 5:47 am to
I can't find toilet paper, and now I'm supposed to go buy Chloroquine?

Maybe I'll try a swimming pool supply place.
Posted by bayoumuscle21
St. George
Member since Jan 2012
4634 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 5:52 am to
quote:

Which the FDA came out after the presser to let everyone know that it is NOT FDA approved.


Geez the ignorance.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 5:54 am to
FDA guys response:. There are a lot of things in the pipeline, muh keeping you safe, muh lots of studies, vaccine in 42 months
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 6:02 am to
quote:

muh lots of studies, vaccine in 42 months


That long? I would have about a 0 chance to Not catch this crap. I'm in that 16% chance to NOT make it. I am 10+ years living with HF which is very high.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 6:12 am to
I'm being facetious because I didn't like the FDA guys vibe yesterday.

I read what hopeful doc posted above, but I don't care about normal protocol for this thing.

If we believe this drug lessens the symptoms or cures this, the Federal government needs to start recommending its use and guarantee doctors that they won't be blamed if something goes wrong.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 6:14 am to
So I found it odd that this Gregory Rigano guy has been way overstating the results and the implications of this study (albeit promising nonetheless) And despite having nothing to do with the study though, but he’s been interviewed as if an expert Fox News, Glenn Beck, etc. because he says he’s an “an advisor to the Stanford School of Medicine.”

It turns out, that’s this is a complete lie:

Chloroquine May Fight Covid-19—and Silicon Valley’s Into It
quote:

a spokesperson for Stanford Medical School emails: “Stanford Medicine, including SPARK, wasn’t involved in the creation of the Google document, and we’ve requested that the author remove all references to us. In addition, Gregory Rigano is not an advisor with Stanford School of Medicine and no one at Stanford was involved in the study.
And this should had been obvious if the media had just looked at his LinkedIn profile because no expert would ever include something like this in his/her education profile:
quote:

Earned an A in Organic Chemistry.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3977 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 6:20 am to
quote:

buckeye_vol


That’s so crazy. I remember thinking it was odd his credentials were listed as med school advisor when he went on Tucker. What a fricking psychopath
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101387 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 6:21 am to
When I saw the guy on Tucker Carlson, it was clear that he was sketchy as frick. I also couldn’t stop wondering what the hell an “Advisor to Stanford Medical School” was or does. The guy wasn’t presented as an MD (yet, here he was trotting our supposed groundbreaking medical info). So, what is he supposed to be “advising” them on and why wouldn’t a preeminent med school trot out one of their many MDs to provide this info, rather than this sketchy dude?
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29180 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 6:32 am to
Other countries can get this out to their citizens because they don’t have the fricked up legal system the US does that leads to forever lead times for drug approvals and reluctant doctors. I’m surprised Spencer, Gordon and Morris haven’t started chloroquine lawsuit commercials already. I’m sure they think this will be the next asbestos/Roundup level payday.
Posted by phunkatron
Member since Jun 2019
1444 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:21 am to
So you are out of your depth, got it
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:28 am to
Hopeful Doc provided some great insight... just wanted to add (as a non medical professional) that Tiguar is a doc using it and JennBN indicated they were using it a patient.

Neither is using the azithromyacin in concert at this point, but I would expect that changes.

Remember that Hydroxychloroquine only reduced the viral load by 50% by itself but completely knocked the virus out when used in concert.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14960 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:30 am to
quote:

What about if they used these drugs with a person that is in heart failure?



There's not an absolute contraindication that I'm aware of for that, but most CHF patients are going to be on 4+ meds, and your doc will need to look at how it interacts with them.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14960 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:32 am to
quote:

the Federal government needs to start recommending its use



FWIW, I don't give a frick what the federal government thinks when it comes to how I treat patients.



ETA- it's professional societies recommendation that holds weight. They're on top of things, generally speaking. You've got it a bit backwards though- the hesitancy to wholeheartedly recommend it from the top down is not them being unaware of it. It's because there isn't so much data that it needs to be used everywhere right now.
This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 7:35 am
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:44 am to
Taking 8 different drugs. Some twice a day.

Will ask my Cordo Doctor next week.
This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 7:46 am
Posted by BengalBlood81
Member since Oct 2014
1293 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:45 am to
Thanks for your posts doc. Are you using the addition of Azithromycin with Chloroquine on any patients you see as appropriate?

And do you think that for patients without underlying health conditions that using this treatment can get the viral load to a self manageable state and out of high risk?
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14960 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 7:56 am to
Well, I literally used all the tests I had and, thus far, all were negative.


But I can't get anymore right now.

So right now, every febrile respiratory illness that isn't there flu is this, as far as I'm concerned. Isolation is probably the most important thing. If they're not particularly ill, I'll probably just isolate them. If they're moderately ill,I would consider these on a case by case basis.



ETA- there is a high risk of confirmation bias when you give people a drug to treat something that most often gets better on its own to begin with.
This post was edited on 3/20/20 at 7:57 am
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39223 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:05 am to
quote:

I'm sure that was a gigantic sample size. I wonder what type of long term side effects this could have? But yea, let's just give it to everyone.

The South Koreans successfully used it, and it is already an FDA approved drug. Getting enough of it, and getting it distributed, might be a problem, but there is no doubt about using it.
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:19 am to
quote:

FWIW, I don't give a frick what the federal government thinks when it comes to how I treat patients.


When I was going to Ochsner heart transplant center which had treated me for 8 years till I said enough was enough, they treated me with some drugs that were not for heart failure. I been a case what they call, is outside the box. My EF was down below 12%. My heart has got a little better over time. Last test I was just under 20%. So, I feel using any drug that will buy some time should be used under close care. Been there, done that.

And thanks hopeful doc.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram