- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California passes "Right to Die"/Assisted Suicide Bill - Do you support?
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:27 am to GeauxTigerTM
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:27 am to GeauxTigerTM
"after the above"
above what? i use reason and leave emotion out of my arguments. you on the other hand base your position on emotion rather than reason.
above what? i use reason and leave emotion out of my arguments. you on the other hand base your position on emotion rather than reason.
1
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:27 am to GetCocky11
Only as an absolutely last option to stop pain and suffering. I could never do it, but I've also never been in that much pain.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:31 am to Pectus
quote:
I support getting dat will money!
How does this new law work with life insurance? Void it still?
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:31 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
As I do not subscribe to your belief system, I ought to be able to do what I like.
Just because you don't subscribe to his belief system doesn't mean you can do whatever you want. His religion says suicide is a sin and we have religious freedom in this country which means you can't piss all over someone's beliefs by committing suicide. It's the first amendment.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:31 am to runningTiger
quote:
above what?
You suggested I defrauded LSU in an attempt to somehow discredit my argument here. Not only was it a shitty thing to suggest, at it was entirely untrue and if our old pal Coolidge was still alive he'd be happy to attest to that as he helped me work with LSU a bit in that regard, but you all but posted my real name here because you did not like my point of view. You ought to be banned...what from the looks of it would not be the first time.
In short...you have absolutely no credibility to ask for any argument from me. You're a dishonest asshat.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:33 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
Don't waste your time. It's TulaneLSU.
He seems dumber than TulaneLSU. Not as articulate but yea he sucks.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:34 am to LucasP
quote:
Just because you don't subscribe to his belief system doesn't mean you can do whatever you want. His religion says suicide is a sin and we have religious freedom in this country which means you can't piss all over someone's beliefs by committing suicide. It's the first amendment.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:38 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
No...that is inaccurate. The issue I ran into with LSU was pretty simple. I was producing t-shirt designs with GEAUX TIGERS on them for Cafe Press. I was also using my Tiger Roar handle of Geaux Tiger as the "brand" so to speak so that members would associate the designs with the stuff I was doing on the board. As LSU did not have that trademarked at the time (I researched) I felt confident that it would not be an issue.
And now that I'm thinking about this again for the first time in a decade, I need to clarify this further.
The issue wasn't even that I was using Geaux Tigers on the designs, it's that I was using GeauxTiger in advertising the designs. And when I say "advertising" I mean using it on fliers and leaflets, etc. I'd have to see if I could find one somewhere, but I think I held the domain geauxtigergraphics.com or something.
That's it...period.
For those that have no fricking clue what this clown is talking about, forgive me for having to address any of this here.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:42 am to GetCocky11
Yes
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:48 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
How does this new law work with life insurance? Void it still?
I'm not 100% sure, but most policies offer a terminal illness rider, so if the law is restricted to terminal illness patients, it shouldn't matter. In most cases, a terminal illness rider pays out the death benefit to the beneficiary in the event that the covered life is diagnosed with a terminal illness and has less than 12-months to live.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:48 am to GetCocky11
Yes, absolutely.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:56 am to Patrick_Bateman
I think with heavy restrictions such as approval of immediate family, death does cause financial hardship on family, and most of all that not a cent of taxpayer money nor insurance goes into it. Personal choice should come from personal funds and adding it to a list of things covered by insurance would just add to the premium pool.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 8:56 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
So you think your religion should dictate the law?
So you think that not believing should give you a pass to break the law? A sort of atheist get-out-of-jail-free card? That's not how religious freedom works.
quote:
theocracy
Fancy word there.
quote:
You don't have to participate in this due to you religion, that's perfectly fine. You should not be able to make this decision for others.
And others can make all the decisions they want as long as it doesn't inhibit my religious freedom. Part of that freedom is that suicide is a sin, so it won't fly in a nation with religious freedom.
Read the constitution before posting stuff like this so you don't sound foolish in the future.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:03 am to runningTiger
quote:Why not?
people should never have the legal right to end the life of a human being
their own or another
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:04 am to GetCocky11
What if this is the reason the ZA starts?
When we make a law disregarding life, the dead begin coming back.
FTWD is a disguised message being sent out by the conscience of the world to the masses.
When we make a law disregarding life, the dead begin coming back.
FTWD is a disguised message being sent out by the conscience of the world to the masses.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:07 am to TrueTiger
quote:
find me one person that has ever been convicted of committing suicide.
Well that would be hard since they're all dead
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:07 am to Barf
quote:It is insanely arrogant for someone to think it's ok to tell someone else what to do with their body and their life.
To deny someone the ability to choose makes you an a-hole.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:10 am to GetCocky11
Religion aside, I think it's scary to be putting healthcare in the government's hands while passing these kinds of laws. At some point, can the government decide that your life is not worth keeping?
"Sorry, sir. Under you government health plan, we have to kill you now."
"Sorry, sir. Under you government health plan, we have to kill you now."
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:12 am to LucasP
quote:
And others can make all the decisions they want as long as it doesn't inhibit my religious freedom. Part of that freedom is that suicide is a sin, so it won't fly in a nation with religious freedom.
Read the constitution before posting stuff like this so you don't sound foolish in the future.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:15 am to SwaggerCopter
quote:
At some point, can the government decide that your life is not worth keeping?
No, no they can't. This law doesn't even come close to suggesting that something like what you are saying would happen.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News