- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: But seriously folks why isnt there pics of flight 77 slamming into Pentagon
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:41 am to Tigeralum2008
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:41 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
That's an altered version of the actual video
Damn. Nothing gets past you.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:42 am to GrammarKnotsi
quote:
quote:
The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide—not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.
Did ya miss the big arse hole on the outer ring?
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:52 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
I've been thinking the same thing as I've read this entire thread. Ring C...is two whole buildings in. I mean the Pentagon is really a series of connected buildings with courtyards in between. It is POSSIBLE that on impact and explosion the landing gear may have been detached and "shot" forward.
But we're discussing ring C here, not the initial impact zone, thus sort of throwing or trying to throw some confusion into the argument.
**ANCHORED** It's like every decent post I make is to an anchored thread.
I ran across the hologram assertion just yesterday in the comment section of a YouTube video. There are more than a few "truthers" out there, but then YouTube is a fairly vile place with vile posters. It makes us on the OT look like Cub Scouts and Brownies.

But we're discussing ring C here, not the initial impact zone, thus sort of throwing or trying to throw some confusion into the argument.
**ANCHORED** It's like every decent post I make is to an anchored thread.
I ran across the hologram assertion just yesterday in the comment section of a YouTube video. There are more than a few "truthers" out there, but then YouTube is a fairly vile place with vile posters. It makes us on the OT look like Cub Scouts and Brownies.
This post was edited on 9/12/18 at 9:54 am
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:58 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
That's an altered version of the actual video
It not altered, it's security cam footage ...
Basically a time lapse VHS recording back in 2001, which was "state of the art" back then...
There was no digital recording back then like today...
This post was edited on 9/12/18 at 10:02 am
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:00 am to maxxrajun70
Don't be late for the flat earth meeting. Tin foil hats required
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:00 am to PCRammer
quote:
They kinda painted themselves into a corner by having the naming meeting before the design meeting. Lessons learned, I guess.
Severely underrated post.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:00 am to vl100butch
quote:
There is a video.....but it's kinda hard to deny as a pair of jet engines with serial numbers tracked back to the appropriate aircraft were found in the ruins...
Unless they were put there by Bush and his cronies at Haliburton in order to get us into an illegal war!1111111
:tinfoilhat.jpg:
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:09 am to Winston Cup
quote:
The pentagon seems like a poorly designed building. I don’t understand the need to shape it that way
quote:
Winston Cup
not surprising
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:09 am to Pilot Tiger
100 story ? Sure not hard
4-5 story? Meh
4-5 story? Meh
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:16 am to PorcelainPunisher
quote:
The same reason there is almost no live footage of the first plane hitting the WTC.
well there is footage of that, at least from one guy working for the fire dept
Yep there definitely is. Watch 9/11 15 Years Later. A couple of filmakers were making a documentary on kids becoming firemen at a firehouse 7 blocks from the WTC. They caught it on video.
This post was edited on 9/12/18 at 10:19 am
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:18 am to CarRamrod
LMAO......The sacred creed of trumpanzees.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:30 am to TheFlyingTiger
It’s not that hard is the answer. Sulley could have parked that motherfricker on the Pentagon like a harrier, and everyone could have slid out with no scratches.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:40 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
The same reason there is almost no live footage of the first plane hitting the WTC. You would think with the millions in NYC, especially tourists, more people would have caught it. But it was juts a normal day until it wasn't.
There is. It’s not live but a man and his brother were filming a documentary on firefighters and they caught it on tape. 2 French filmmakers with the last name of Naudet. It was released in 2002 I believe
Posted on 9/12/18 at 11:03 am to Winston Cup
quote:Should they have used a swastika shape?
The pentagon seems like a poorly designed building. I don’t understand the need to shape it that way
Posted on 9/12/18 at 4:02 pm to PeterPeterP
Unless I over looked it in the serval pages of this glorious thread.... the government went almost immediately to any and all businesses around the Pentagon and took the stores security tapes. So odds are if a camera had shown something it's in the governments posession.
Popular
Back to top


0









