- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: But seriously folks why isnt there pics of flight 77 slamming into Pentagon
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:05 am to GrammarKnotsi
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:05 am to GrammarKnotsi
quote:faster than i would have thought. I wonder if this is correct. Id like to see a study of this.
When the plane hit at 350 miles an hour, t
1
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:05 am to 777Tiger
quote:
especially since it was retracted into the fuselage at the point of impact
bro..you can clearly see them in that video..is it fake now to prove your point ?
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:07 am to 777Tiger
quote:I mass and inertia way more than you bro.
but it isnt something that is going to crumble thick concrete walls.
bro, do even mass and inertia?
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:08 am to TH03
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/12/18 at 9:09 am
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:09 am to 777Tiger
quote:an object in motion stays in motion.
especially since it was retracted into the fuselage at the point of impact
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:09 am to 777Tiger
He’s talking about the gif I posted.
That would be tough to deal with though. Your father/husband is dead and people think it’s just a fake.
That would be tough to deal with though. Your father/husband is dead and people think it’s just a fake.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:12 am to CarRamrod
quote:
faster than i would have thought. I wonder if this is correct. Id like to see a study of this.
You can google the flight data recorder.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:13 am to TH03
"OMG ITS FAKE SHOW ME VIDEO EVIDENCE!"
shows video evidence
"OMG THAT VIDEO EVIDENCE IS FAKE!"
shows video evidence
"OMG THAT VIDEO EVIDENCE IS FAKE!"
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:14 am to GetCocky11
quote:yep. so i still stand behind my stance. and reading about those recent constructions updates, i was right.
faster than i would have thought. I wonder if this is correct. Id like to see a study of this.
You can google the flight data recorder.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:14 am to CarRamrod
Bro, look at the gif I posted on the first page.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:16 am to maxxrajun70
Small video frame. Fast fricking jet. Time-lapse photo.
Stop the conspiracy madness. It happened.
Stop the conspiracy madness. It happened.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:17 am to TH03
thats what im referring to.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:20 am to maxxrajun70
Idiot.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:22 am to TH03
That's an altered version of the actual video
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:24 am to GrammarKnotsi
quote:
GrammarKnotsi
thank you for sharing. i was hoping someone knew the reason. very interesting
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:27 am to Winston Cup
quote:
i was hoping someone knew the reason. very interesting
I think seeing it laid out on that map makes a big difference..Like someone else said though, its odd that they kept the shape after moving the location
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:27 am to TH03
quote:
Fun fact, construction on the pentagon began on September 11, 1941.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:30 am to TH03
I really didn't know that "Trutherism" was still a thing.
I get being skeptical about people's motivations. I get being skeptical as to exactly who was doing what to/for whom behind the scenes - I completely get all that.
But to deny literal, observable, verified "facts" underlying this incident is mind boggling. Most of the WORLD watched United 175 strike the South Tower and then the subsequent fires and collapses of the buildings.
Now, could all of this been "staged"? Sure, but they staged it with fricking airplanes with people in them. Not missiles. Not unicorns. Not fairy dust.
Planes full of people.
I get being skeptical about people's motivations. I get being skeptical as to exactly who was doing what to/for whom behind the scenes - I completely get all that.
But to deny literal, observable, verified "facts" underlying this incident is mind boggling. Most of the WORLD watched United 175 strike the South Tower and then the subsequent fires and collapses of the buildings.
Now, could all of this been "staged"? Sure, but they staged it with fricking airplanes with people in them. Not missiles. Not unicorns. Not fairy dust.
Planes full of people.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:34 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Most of the WORLD watched United 175 strike the South Tower and then the subsequent fires and collapses of the buildings.
There was one "documentary" that claimed the planes were holograms and bombs actually blew up the buildings.
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:38 am to Dale Murphy
quote:
There was one "documentary" that claimed the planes were holograms and bombs actually blew up the buildings.
This is actually far less likely than Musk's assertion that we are all already living in a fully simulated reality.
Reality would be easier to fake than 9/11 with "holograms" and bombs. Like bad science fiction writers came up with that.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News