- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Boosters are over.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:51 am
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:51 am
quote:
Now the World Health Organization has waved the white flag on Covid vaccine boosters too.
WHO released a statement about Covid vaccines yesterday. It’s filled with the usual public health jargon and arse-covering, but one line stands out:
a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.
It’s over, people.
LINK
ETA, WHO link: LINK
This post was edited on 1/12/22 at 10:25 am
51
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:52 am to GumboPot
I and millions of others have been had!
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:53 am to GumboPot
quote:
It’s over, people
wanna bet?
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:53 am to GumboPot
GET BOOSTED OR YOU'LL DIE!!!!!
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:53 am to GumboPot
Is there a direct Link to the WHO saying this?
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:53 am to GumboPot
A few corrupt Pfizer dollars is gonna help the WHO come back to their senses.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:54 am to GumboPot
quote:
a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.
A reformulated/updated vaccine is still on the table though.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:55 am to GumboPot
does this
equal this
quote:
a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.
equal this
quote:
Boosters are over
This post was edited on 1/12/22 at 9:55 am
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:56 am to GumboPot
Not until the science gnome gets stuffed into a woodchipper.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:56 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
and millions of others have been had!
Not this pureblood
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:56 am to GumboPot
Who is Alex Berenson?
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:57 am to c on z
quote:
Who is Alex Berenson?
Your father. Sorry you had to find out this way.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:58 am to GumboPot
You are assuming politicians will have integrity and common sense.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:58 am to VermilionTiger
quote:
Is there a direct Link to the WHO saying this?
Just a quick google search on the bolded part and you get an entire page of Legacy Media articles on the same subject.
I just rather link Alex Berenson when he is reporting on it because has been a straight shooting independent reporter on this entire COVID debacle and had to leave the New York Times to maintain that independence.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:58 am to GumboPot
quote:
It’s over, people.
LINK
quote:
“Until such vaccines are available, and as the SARS-CoV-2 virus evolves, the composition of current COVID-19 vaccines may need to be updated, to ensure that COVID-19 vaccines continue to provide WHO-recommended levels of protection against infection and disease by VOCs, including Omicron and future variants,” the WHO said.
The panel has said that new COVID-19 vaccines need to be based on strains that are genetically and antigenically close to the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant(s) and elicit immune responses that are broad, strong, and long-lasting in order to reduce the need for successive booster doses.
The panel has recommended vaccine manufacturers to consider a monovalent vaccine that elicits an immune response against the predominant circulating variant(s), although this option faces the challenge of the rapid emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and the time needed to develop a modified or new vaccine. The panel has also recommended a multivalent vaccine containing antigens from different SARS-CoV-2 VOCs; or a pan SARS-CoV-2 vaccine – a more sustainable long-term option that would effectively be variant-proof.
Sounds like they are moving to a yearly flu style vaccine.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:58 am to GumboPot
Suckers
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:59 am to GumboPot
quote:
a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable
The booster isn't harmful, rather have peace of mind that I am protected.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:59 am to GumboPot
They lost the mandate with Omicron. Spain is announcing that they will treat this like seasonal influenza. These threats of mandates and ridiculous measures are just to squeeze as much profit out of this as they can.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:59 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
does this
quote: a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.
equal this
quote: Boosters are over
It does not. But it does mean pharma is going to have to develop new boosters to deal with new strains instead of just “keep taking boosters for the original virus that is pretty much gone.”
Not against vaccines by any stretch but when the only answer is “keep taking the same shot” you know it’s not an effective mitigation any more.
Posted on 1/12/22 at 10:00 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
The booster isn't harmful, rather have peace of mind that I am protected.
But you’re not.
Page 1 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News