- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Body Cam footage of Atlanta police shooting released.
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:08 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:08 pm to upgrayedd
The DA saying it's deadly and an actual law that says it's deadly are two different things. Even if it was, the suspect was running away from the officers which means it doesn't qualify as an imminent threat. You are correct that it's about as open and shut as cases get, though. It's just not the way you think.
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:09 pm to MLU
quote:
The DA saying it's deadly and an actual law that says it's deadly are two different things. Even if it was, the suspect was running away from the officers which means it doesn't qualify as an imminent threat. You are correct that it's about as open and shut as cases get, though. It's just not the way you think.
Oh, look.....another one.
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:10 pm to MLU
quote:
he suspect was running away
While turned around firing a taser at the officer
Lets not let the facts get in the way
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:10 pm to Antonio Moss
He wasn't firing a taser. He was running away from the officers with one in his hand, meaning he had no intention of harm.
When you mean harm to someone, do you normally run away from them?
When you mean harm to someone, do you normally run away from them?
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:11 pm to MLU
quote:
He wasn't firing a taser. He was running away from the officers with one in his hand, meaning he had no intention of harm.
You haven't watched any of the video, have you?
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:11 pm to MLU
quote:
He wasn't firing a taser. He was running away from the officers with one in his hand, meaning he had no intention of harm.
He shot the taser at the officer you fricking idiot, go back and watch the video.
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:12 pm to MLU
He shot the taser and hit the other officer.
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:13 pm to MLU
quote:
The DA saying it's deadly and an actual law that says it's deadly are two different things. Even if it was, the suspect was running away from the officers which means it doesn't qualify as an imminent threat. You are correct that it's about as open and shut as cases get, though. It's just not the way you think.
You do realize that same DA actually charged other officers with Assault with a deadly weapon. That weapon they were using on a person not complying? A taser.
This post was edited on 6/21/20 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:13 pm to MLU
I’m pretty fricking stupid but Jesus Christ you’re on whole different level. The officers will get off and you can do some more “peaceful protesting” In a different city. What a scumbag you really are.
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:15 pm to Walt OReilly
quote:
I’m pretty fricking stupid but Jesus Christ you’re on whole different level. The officers will get off and you can do some more “peaceful protesting” In a different city. What a scumbag you really are.
One uninformed idiot after another has rolled through this thread spouting the same shite. None of them have read the thread, much less read other accounts or watched any of the videos. They are simply parroting what they are told happened.
This post was edited on 6/21/20 at 11:16 pm
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:16 pm to MLU
RB disarmed an officer of taser. RB points and fires taser at officer while fleeing. Officer cannot be expected to know the taser, after RB fires it at pursuing officer, has now fired twice and is now inoperable. Officer cannot allow himself to be tased or he risks RB taking his pistol. Unfortunate result, but not excessive use of force.
This post was edited on 6/21/20 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:17 pm to Gangsacked
quote:
Officer cannot be expected to know taser has fired twice and is now inoperable
It looked pretty operable when he fired it and it glanced off the officer's arm.
Posted on 6/21/20 at 11:23 pm to MLU
This post was edited on 6/25/20 at 8:54 am
Posted on 6/27/20 at 7:53 pm to LegendInMyMind
I have. The taser was fired twice. The officer knew this. That just so happens to be the max number of times that tazer can be fired, so like I said he was not firing the tazer.
Posted on 6/27/20 at 7:55 pm to thermal9221
Yes, while they were on the ground he fired off the non-lethal weapon further demonstrating that the officers were in no danger of losing their life.
Posted on 6/27/20 at 7:57 pm to MLU
I wish it was you there instead of Brooks, the OT would be better off
Posted on 6/27/20 at 7:58 pm to MLU
quote:
I have. The taser was fired twice. The officer knew this. That just so happens to be the max number of times that tazer can be fired, so like I said he was not firing the tazer.
Alright. Okay. Alright.
So, what was it that came out of the end of that taser when he pointed it at the cop and pulled the trigger? Fairy dust?
Posted on 6/27/20 at 8:00 pm to MLU
quote:
the officers were in no danger of losing their life.
The officer were physically assaulted
Further there were innocent bystanders who could have become victims
Rayshard brought this on himself
Posted on 6/27/20 at 8:00 pm to MLU
quote:
Yes, while they were on the ground he fired off the non-lethal weapon further demonstrating that the officers were in no danger of losing their life.
You are aware that there is a stun mode on those tasers that does not use the cartridge to fire the probes? It is used when in close contact where the taser can't be fired traditionally. It operates just like a stun gun.
You know that, right?
This post was edited on 6/27/20 at 8:01 pm
Popular
Back to top


4





