- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Binary and neutrons are the key to understanding matter and civilization
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:24 pm
1s are just yes’es and 0s are just no’s. Independent they are the extremists. Together we they become code/existence.
Protons are just protons, electrons are just energy. Together they become neutrons and matter.
WE GOTTA BECOME A COMMUNITY AGIAIN TO EXIST AS WE SHOULD!
Protons are just protons, electrons are just energy. Together they become neutrons and matter.
WE GOTTA BECOME A COMMUNITY AGIAIN TO EXIST AS WE SHOULD!
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:27 pm to theunknownknight
Put the meth down bruh.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:29 pm to theunknownknight
You are discounting that sometime a yes identifies as a proton. You see, you only want unity if it fits your world view.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:30 pm to theunknownknight
Have you ever looked at your hands? I mean really looked at them.
That should keep him occupied for a while.
That should keep him occupied for a while.
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:32 pm to theunknownknight
You can't have something without nothing, and you can't have nothing without something.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:33 pm to theunknownknight
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:33 pm to theunknownknight
The yin yang symbol teaches that even though we perceive difference, there is always the One.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 2:18 pm to theunknownknight
In line with CelticDog's post, there is a definite parallel in the ideas of binary numbers and yin/yang.
I'll quote an anecdote from the history of the I Ching in a book I have... My I Ching book is written by Kerson Huang (a physicist), and his take-- undoubtedly influenced by his being a scientist-- is to strip away the layers of excessive moralizing applied to the system to some extent by the Taoists, but moreso by the Confucians. Huang still regards it an Oracle of sorts, but refrains from stepping too far out onto any metaphysical branch.
Anyway, here's the anecdote:
This anecdote instantly came to mind as I read your OP. So, there is a definite history of others sharing your opinion of the binary underpinnings of creation.
Interestingly, Carl Jung found the I Ching a useful tool in treating patients as well, constantly providing uncannily appropriate responses to queries, which helped move things forward.
I'll quote an anecdote from the history of the I Ching in a book I have... My I Ching book is written by Kerson Huang (a physicist), and his take-- undoubtedly influenced by his being a scientist-- is to strip away the layers of excessive moralizing applied to the system to some extent by the Taoists, but moreso by the Confucians. Huang still regards it an Oracle of sorts, but refrains from stepping too far out onto any metaphysical branch.
Anyway, here's the anecdote:
quote:
Leibniz, the mathematician who shares with Newton the credit for the creation of calculus, was thinking about binary integers when he came across the I Ching in 1689. The Jesuit priest Bouvet had sent him a copy from China, with a list of the hexagrams in the Fuxi order and a segregation diagram. Leibniz instantly recognized the hexagram symbols as none other than binary representations of the sixty-four integers from 0 to 63, with Earth being 0 and Heaven 63. He was astounded to find in so ancient a source the very idea he was working on, namely that out of the elementary dyad 0 and 1, one can in principle build everything-- the motivation for his study of binary mathematics. In his first full discourse on binary integers, published in 1703, he acknowledged their origin in "the ancient Chinese diagrams of Fohy (Fuxi)." It was his belief that God had revealed the truth to Fuxi three thousand years before his time.
This anecdote instantly came to mind as I read your OP. So, there is a definite history of others sharing your opinion of the binary underpinnings of creation.
Interestingly, Carl Jung found the I Ching a useful tool in treating patients as well, constantly providing uncannily appropriate responses to queries, which helped move things forward.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 8:46 pm to epbart
When opposing forcing come together like interlocking puzzle pieces, true existence is born.
Balance is achieved.
Balance is achieved.
Popular
Back to top

11












