Started By
Message

re: Bill Nye Debates Ken Ham

Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4480 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:24 pm to
I agree but it still does not change the the basic premise of the statement, and that both creationist and those who claim to be scientists can be boxed into what others veiw to be a foolish assumption
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475759 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Did Ham even dispute anything he just said?

dating methods
Posted by Patron Saint
Member since Jul 2013
4214 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:24 pm to
Tough crowd tonight for Bill Nye
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475759 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

neither are going to address the other here. this is basically an extra 5 minutes for each

pretty much

nye's presentation and organization was absolutely horrible. both relied upon trying to attack random minutia of the other theory instead of supporting their own theory.
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:25 pm to
It's Kentucky. If it's not jokes about sister ficking or basketball. They don't understand
Posted by SW2SCLA
We all float down here
Member since Feb 2009
23058 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:25 pm to
I'm thinking Ham has a bit of a home field advantage
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475759 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Tough crowd tonight for Bill Nye

he did a terrible job
Posted by Patron Saint
Member since Jul 2013
4214 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:26 pm to
I was talking about his joke, not his argument.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:27 pm to
At least Nye is directly addressing some of the things he's said tonight.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:27 pm to
both arguments were terrible. not the content but the delivery and picking of what to use.

i dont follow either of these two but they both seemed poorly prepared for their "competition"
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12482 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

both arguments were terrible. not the content but the delivery and picking of what to use.

i dont follow either of these two but they both seemed poorly prepared for their "competition"


Nye went way too far into specific examples for a crowd that doesn't understand shite about science.
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:30 pm to
Nye is about to smoke this butch
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20607 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:32 pm to
Did he just say that the ark was real and they have built 1/3rd of the ark to scale?
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19185 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:32 pm to
So.....by a show of hands who votes for the 6,000 year Earth?
Posted by Patron Saint
Member since Jul 2013
4214 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:34 pm to
Nye trying to argue that the ark couldn't be built seems kind of irrelevant.
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12482 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Nye trying to argue that the ark couldn't be built seems kind of irrelevant.


Ham keeps bringing it up, which makes it relevant to the debate.
Posted by SW2SCLA
We all float down here
Member since Feb 2009
23058 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Nye trying to argue that the ark couldn't be built seems kind of irrelevant.



Agreed. Could have chosen a better point of argument
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4480 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:36 pm to
Ridiculous argument, still doesn't change the fact that the Universe was created by a higher being, the alternative is really not even scientifically defensible.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20607 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

Ridiculous argument, still doesn't change the fact that the Universe was created by a higher being, the alternative is really not even scientifically defensible.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19185 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Ridiculous argument, still doesn't change the fact that the Universe was created by a higher being, the alternative is really not even scientifically defensible.


I didn't make the argument against a higher being.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram