- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:49 am to stout
I don't share
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:54 am to stout
quote:
Exceptions are included for police investigations and people who intentionally expose themselves in public.
huh?
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:59 am to AUCE05
quote:
I think the target is the people who sell pics/vids to porn sites without the knowledge of that person. That's what this covers in states with the same law.
Ah, ok. They still need to address the issue in a general sense imo.
quote:
Seems you would lose your right to privacy if you knowingly send a nude pic.
Imo, if you send it to a person's specific device you should expect it not to go past that device. If you broadcast it in a public arena then that is another issue.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:59 am to tigerbutt
Im assuming like sporting event streakers.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:01 am to tigerbutt
Cops can send images as part of their investigation without facing criminal penalties. Likewise, you can take a picture of someone exposing themselves in public to aid in that person's criminal prosecution. If you punished people for taking the picture of the flasher/nudist then you would deter people from gathering evidence against the flasher.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:11 am to BTiger0306
quote:
Likewise, you can take a picture of someone exposing themselves in public to aid in that person's criminal prosecution.
And/or a tv camera that happened to catch a streaker could wind up turning into a criminal issue.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:20 am to CorporateTiger
We send confidential emails at work. We can sue if that info is shared outside of the intended group. Just because something is sent through an electronic process doesn't mean it is public information.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:29 am to jmarto1
quote:
Imo, if you send it to a person's specific device you should expect it not to go past that device.
when you send a pic to a person it becomes their property to do with it as they please
these laws are ridiculous nanny state bullshite that are terrible and really frick up property laws
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:32 am to AUCE05
quote:
We send confidential emails at work. We can sue if that info is shared outside of the intended group.
that is likely covered either by contract with the employee (who sent out the information) or property law covering trade secrets
it's nothing like this
remove the sensationalism and think about the general law here. use a non-nude example. what if somebody sends you a picture of their kids and you send that to somebody else. is that wrong? what if somebody sends you a picture of their house? new tv? clothing?
there is no difference in the these examples and "revenge porn" except content of the message. think about what kind of chilling effect this law has now. we're selecting groups of information that are now a FELONY to distribute. it's a terrible precedent and an afront to property laws
and no, i don't support people who spread nudes around, but when you send out a nude, it's not your picture anymore. it's his/her's
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:34 am to AUCE05
quote:
We send confidential emails at work. We can sue if that info is shared outside of the intended group. Just because something is sent through an electronic process doesn't mean it is public information.
They're treating nudes like privileged communications
This post was edited on 8/2/15 at 9:35 am
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:35 am to stout
This wasn't already illegal?
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
when you send out a nude, it's not your picture anymore
I agree. If you send it out, you have to accept any negative consequence.
It would be a problem if someone took a photo of you (in private) without your knowledge and consent and sent it out. But if you send it yourself I don't feel bad for you.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:42 am to tigerinthebueche
quote:
Define patial nudity
Louisiana strip clubs
This post was edited on 8/2/15 at 9:43 am
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:48 am to HoustonChick86
quote:
I agree. If you send it out, you have to accept any negative consequence.
If we were only a nation that made people accept the consequences of there actions.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i don't support people who spread nudes around, but when you send out a nude, it's not your picture anymore. it's his/her's
I think this law has more to do with people spreading a picture around and intending to inflicted shame or doing so to be malicious.
I may give or buy my husband a handgun but if he uses it to shoot me doesn't make what he did legal because I bought and gave him the handgun.
Farfetched I know, but kinda the same reasoning.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 11:05 am to AUCE05
quote:
We send confidential emails at work. We can sue if that info is shared outside of the intended group. Just because something is sent through an electronic process doesn't mean it is public information.
But no one goes to prison.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 11:29 am to djangochained
quote:
Let's be honest, when's the last time a woman sent your ugly arse a nude pic?
I lol'd
Posted on 8/2/15 at 11:31 am to SpicyStacy
quote:
I hope u never get mad at me n post the noodz
I'm mad you don't send more
Posted on 8/2/15 at 11:33 am to PinkTiger
quote:
I may give or buy my husband a handgun but if he uses it to shoot me doesn't make what he did legal because I bought and gave him the handgun. Farfetched I know, but kinda the same reasoning.
Good god. That's the best comparison you can make?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News