- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Average waist size of women 20 and older is 38"
Posted on 6/26/18 at 8:57 am to rowbear1922
Posted on 6/26/18 at 8:57 am to rowbear1922
quote:
If I ever got to a 38" waist, I'd want to kill myself as a male.
When I hit 36" it's time to start working out. It's happening more often these days
1
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:00 am to Mike da Tigah
Sure diet plays a huge role, but for the most part, Americans are more sedentary compared with our European/Asian counterparts. Travel abroad for some time and you’ll see how so many cultures walk way more than we do. Some people in Europe walk 8-12 miles a day. We use a car for everything here in the US.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:00 am to TigerNlc
quote:
I got up to 207 at one point and lost all self respect for myself
Choose one:
A) I lost all self-respect
B) I lost all respect for
myself
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:01 am to Paul Allen
Urban city centers have tons of walkers.
It’s the sprawl that kills walking.
It’s the sprawl that kills walking.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:10 am to DavidTheGnome
looks like Pecker needs to start making threads for tLLOTOT as well
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:14 am to DavidTheGnome
The best thing I ever did for my health was marry a skinny man. I only have about a 6 pound window before it starts looking like he has a fatty fetish. Keeps me on my toes at all times.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:16 am to Paul Allen
I constantly tell my husband, with all the road work they are doing around Ascension, if they don't put in sidewalks they are stupid. I would walk a lot more if they would.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:23 am to jimbeam
No but in this case the median was only .7" less.
Those bitches are yuge
Those bitches are yuge
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:26 am to DavidTheGnome
damn I’m a solid 32 and can’t even imagine hitting 34. I’m 180 now so that would put me in the 200s minimum.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:26 am to rowbear1922
Size 38 jeans aren't actually 38" circumference. Jeans people usually make the sizes smaller than your waist size IIRC
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:44 am to DavidTheGnome
Is that stat real?!?
Damn, I'm a 56 year old man, and consider myself a fatass, but my waist is only a 34. I am glad to report Mrs. Mtntiger is rocking a size 6.
Damn, I'm a 56 year old man, and consider myself a fatass, but my waist is only a 34. I am glad to report Mrs. Mtntiger is rocking a size 6.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:45 am to Sun God
quote:
When I hit 36" it's time to start working out. It's happening more often these days
This is me. When the 34s start to get super tight, it's time to do something. Usually I just eat a little better at first.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:46 am to DavidTheGnome
Had a client in the office the other day who was 5-1 and 190 lbs. I know this because due to a scheduling conflict, she had her home health appointment in my waiting room and I overheard the conversation between her and the nurse. She was also on oxygen, had grotesquely swollen ankles, and sky high blood pressure
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:47 am to rowbear1922
I have a question:
Are they saying average waist size pants needed is 38", or average waist measurment?
Because alot of pants are actually worn more on the hips, which will be wider than a womans waist
So a Woman with a 28.5" waist or so, would actually need like a 34-36" pants if she wore them on her hips
Are they saying average waist size pants needed is 38", or average waist measurment?
Because alot of pants are actually worn more on the hips, which will be wider than a womans waist
So a Woman with a 28.5" waist or so, would actually need like a 34-36" pants if she wore them on her hips
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:50 am to lsupride87
quote:
I have a question:
Are they saying average waist size pants needed is 38", or average waist measurment?
Because alot of pants are actually worn more on the hips, which will be wider than a womans waist
So a Woman with a 28.5" waist or so, would actually need like a 34-36" pants if she wore them on her hips
According to that article, the avg. American male is near a 40 but the most popular sized pants/shorts are a 34" waist. They said this is due to "vanity sizes" and men buying what they have always bought. If vanity sizes are a thing and most common size is a 34" waist, a lot of people have around a 36"-37" waist.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:52 am to rowbear1922
I am just saying a woman’s hips are far on average about 5-6” wider than her waist, and most women are wearing shorts and such more on their hips than actual waste
I could see this skewing the results upwards
I think we have gotten fatter, but I don’t think the median woman’s actual waste is 37.3”
I could see this skewing the results upwards
I think we have gotten fatter, but I don’t think the median woman’s actual waste is 37.3”
This post was edited on 6/26/18 at 9:53 am
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:59 am to DavidTheGnome
BS
Where was this? Tennessee?
Where was this? Tennessee?
Posted on 6/26/18 at 9:59 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
The fatty lovers on the OT will love this. “Something, something, I don’t like women with the body of a 12 year old boy.”
Not a fatty lover, but I don't like woman with the body of a 12 year old boy either.
A woman can have curves without being obese. Everything is not absolute.
Posted on 6/26/18 at 10:01 am to rowbear1922
quote:
I ever got to a 38" waist, I'd want to kill myself as a male.
That's not a huge waist as a male. I wore a 36 waist in high school as a 6'6 245 lb defensive end and I had 6 pack abs
Posted on 6/26/18 at 10:03 am to lsupride87
quote:
I am just saying a woman’s hips are far on average about 5-6” wider than her waist, and most women are wearing shorts and such more on their hips than actual waste
I could see this skewing the results upwards
I think we have gotten fatter, but I don’t think the median woman’s actual waste is 37.3”
The article measured the waist. If you were saying the avg. woman's waist was 32.3" but they wore 37.3" jeans, I could maybe follow your line of thinking. The article states otherwise though. By your thinking, the avg. woman according to the article would need a 42.3" waisted jean.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News