- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Authority exploring new Mississippi River bridge to meet for first time in January
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:02 pm
quote:
The five-parish Capital Area Road and Bridge Authority is eyeing January for its first official meeting to begin exploring how to fund a new span across the Mississippi River.
The authority was created by the Legislature in May but has held off on meeting while officials waited to see if the MovEBR roads tax proposal would be approved by East Baton Rouge Parish voters, says state Sen. Rick Ward, R-Port Allen, who sponsored the legislation creating the authority.
The approval of the MovEBR tax proves public momentum for traffic solutions is building, Ward says, as people are increasingly frustrated with the region’s chronic gridlock and are ready to do something about it.
Momentum is also growing in the private sector for a new bridge. Baton Rouge businessman Jim Bernhard has repeatedly said in recent weeks that his private equity firm, Bernhard Capital Partners, and others would be willing to back the loan to build a new bridge and collect tolls, indicating a public-private partnership is an increasing possibility.
“In the past, what has held these projects back, people would meet with private investors who just weren’t interested,” Ward says. “To have Jim Bernhard out there saying this can be done—and he intends to help get it done—that’s a huge step forward.”
But Bernhard notes public funding will also be needed to cover the costs of feeder roads and infrastructure to supplement a new bridge.
Baton Rouge Business Report
quote:
That’s where the five-parish authority comes in. The authority comprises the presidents of the five parishes of the Capital Region—East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, Ascension, Iberville and Livingston—as well as the secretary of the Department of Transportation and Development, and governor appointee Mike Wampold.
WBR is going to push for the crossing at Brusly, which may not be possible on the EBR side.
Iberville will push for it way the hell down at Bayou Goula. Better than nothing, but way too far south to help the traffic congestion in Baton Rouge.
Livingston, EBR, and Ascension all have their own agenda but will ultimately push hard for the bridge as close to Baton Rouge as possible.
I think Plaquemine Point (between Plaquemine and DOW) is the best option for the crossing. Feeder roads would have to connect it to I-10 and US 190 in WBR and to I-10 in Ascension around Tanger.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:05 pm to goofball
I am not familiar with the area but why wouldn't it be where the ferry is now?
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:06 pm to goofball
Louisiana is losing residents but I guess more people are using I-10 to pass through.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:07 pm to goofball
Yayyyy
Moar committees!
Moar studies!
Moar money to consulting cronies of politicians!
Moar committees!
Moar studies!
Moar money to consulting cronies of politicians!
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:09 pm to goofball
quote:
I think Plaquemine Point (between Plaquemine and DOW) is the best option for the crossing. Feeder roads would have to connect it to I-10 and US 190 in WBR and to I-10 in Ascension around Tanger.
Of course it is, which means it will likely be crossed off the list first
A crossing at LA 74 south of Plaq wouldn't be terrible.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:10 pm to goofball
I'll bet they'll have a pretty nice lunch spread at that meeting.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:11 pm to Cosmo
This is how I'd do it:
Would still require the unavoidable investment into beefing up Airline Highway and I-10 in Baton Rouge. I think this crossing could be even better if it were possible to connect to I-10 in the Spanish Lake area.
Would still require the unavoidable investment into beefing up Airline Highway and I-10 in Baton Rouge. I think this crossing could be even better if it were possible to connect to I-10 in the Spanish Lake area.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:13 pm to goofball
That goes too far south
Need to bulldoze some shite north of prairieville and put it there
Need to bulldoze some shite north of prairieville and put it there
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:14 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Moar committees!
Moar studies!
Moar money to consulting cronies of politicians
That what the MoveBR tax is paying for.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:14 pm to Cosmo
By the time this is actually built in 30 years we will have personal drones to take us everywhere within a 10 mile radius or so.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:19 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
I'll bet they'll have a pretty nice lunch spread at that meeting.
Maybe they'll get around to spending 5-10 minutes talking about solutions too.
Ah who am I kidding?
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:21 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Need to bulldoze some shite north of prairieville and put it there
I think the CCLA people successfully fought the Spanish Lake route 20 years ago. That one probably isn't politically impossible.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:23 pm to kingbob
quote:
A crossing at LA 74 south of Plaq wouldn't be terrible.
probably the most feasible and best route
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:26 pm to kingbob
quote:
A crossing at LA 74 south of Plaq wouldn't be terrible.
Why would we need a crossing so close to the Sunshine bridge?
Wouldn't that make the east side highway route go through the booming metropolis of Carville? Maybe I don't understand the proposed route.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:27 pm to goofball
I like your route goofball. I-10 split would be well before the current New Bridge backup. Plaquemine point is a narrow point of the river, so smaller bridge. Then that road between the bridge and south I-10 would be good for reducing that plant baw traffic from Geismar. And all of that with minimal disruption of residential areas and current high volume roads
The worst possible thing they could do with this bridge is route it so the connection back to south I-10 uses an existing road like Bluebonnet
The worst possible thing they could do with this bridge is route it so the connection back to south I-10 uses an existing road like Bluebonnet
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:30 pm to goofball
quote:
Why would we need a crossing so close to the Sunshine bridge? Wouldn't that make the east side highway route go through the booming metropolis of Carville?
It was ease up all the plant traffic that either goes over the Sunshine Bridge or the Baton Rouge bridge. Would give an alternate route for people in the plants in the Geismar, Carville area. I think a bridge that crosses around Carville or St. Gabriel would be perfect. Right in between the Sunshine Bridge and the BR bridge
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:30 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
The worst possible thing they could do with this bridge is route it so the connection back to south I-10 uses an existing road like Bluebonnet
Agreed.
EBR is taxing itself to widen LA30, but a freeway connection to I-10 is still needed somewhere.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:34 pm to goofball
The most logical place to put is is between Addis and Plaquamine. What would happen is have the 415 extension and run that parallel to LA1 until it hits the new bridge and then connect the EBR side with St. Gabriel (think hwy 74) all the way to I10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News