Started By
Message

re: Ascension Parish Planning Commission Denies New Subdivision

Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:57 pm to
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84665 posts
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

So what? Why is this news?


Maybe this isn’t the thread for you
Posted by KLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
11139 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 4:52 am to
Council members are spineless and corrupt just like our state and federal legislators are.

Here in Central if it makes it to planning committee you just as soon not even bother to show up to oppose. The contractor already has greased enough palms to get it approved.

I’m sure it’s the same as other communities around Baton Rouge.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
26438 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 5:51 am to
quote:

AP citizens tell Datin Bruce to kick rocks.



I'd be interested in having his financials audited. you know he's crooked as a Home Depot 2x4.
Posted by Piebald Panther
Member since Aug 2020
651 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 6:08 am to
quote:

People need to pay more attention to the zoning part if they really want to stop development.


This is what the average citizen doesn’t understand. Once a property gets the necessary zoning, it now has the right by use to be whatever the zoning allows.

If the developer follows all the necessary steps they can’t be denied and will win the lawsuit against the commission

Zachary’s new neighborhoods are a perfect example. No matter how bad they wanted to deny, they couldn’t because the proper steps were taken. All those large tracts that got rezoned for residential development years ago so they’re coming whether they want them or not.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 6:09 am
Posted by Cubera
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2017
228 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 6:46 am to
The problem with all these Planning Commissions is that No just means tweak something and come back again and again and again until you get a yes; yes means yes forever.
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
46799 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 6:54 am to
Down here the planning commission is all realtors. Every new development gets approved with the quickness. No thought is put into extra traffic, electricity, water, drainage, etc.
Posted by KLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
11139 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:16 am to
Also, IF this article is true, where are all the buyers for these new homes?

Government assistance?

Population loss in Louisiana
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11158 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:29 am to
quote:

I once lived on Bertville Road


Bertville residents were about to be pummeled in a few ways

-increased traffic at 44
-Bertville was going to see increased cut through traffic
-this development is going to build up dirt in the drainage canal flood zone creating a narrower, higher channel. This means the natural drainage from Bertville area will take longer to drain off and create back flooding.
Posted by yakster
Member since Mar 2021
4103 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 7:49 am to
How about Dantin Bruce? Where does he live? Many subdivision developers don’t even live in Louisiana much less in AP.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61832 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Many commissioners cited the traffic and flooding concerns as their reasons for denial.


If they would have only been this concerned a few decades ago, then perhaps it would make more sense. Instead, they built all of these subdivisions to bleed off of old country roads and the infrastructure is not able to keep up.

It’s the same old story for the greater BR area, overbuild without the infrastructure to support it and it becomes a logistical nightmare. All this place runs on is dollar signs. There is no plan but to collect.
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
46799 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

How about Dantin Bruce? Where does he live?


That is the name of the company. The two owners are neighbors, residing in Bocage.
Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
15738 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:31 am to
Level Homes continues to struggle selling homes lately

Who's going to buy?
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76193 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:34 am to
Finally!
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48830 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

If the developer follows all the necessary steps they can’t be denied and will win the lawsuit against the commission
this can be the end of the story if that same municipality doesn’t have or adhere to building permit review and regulations. If I get a property re zoned for multi family for a example I still need a building permit wherein all of the traffic, sewer, drainage, parking etc ordinances will have to be met before I can build.

This goes for subdivisions too. There is another layer of approvals that must be met. Now, AP’s permitting process has been a moving target for some time now, particularly in reference to drainage and sewer/traffic impact. The biggest issue is that they’ve chosen to manage via impact fees and not infrastructure improvements
Posted by lsualum01
Member since Sep 2008
1799 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 5:39 pm to
Well, let’s see if I can set the stage. Land seller is good friends with parish president and has donated about $3800 to his campaigns, including help campaigning and building signs. Nephew is on P&Z. The broker for the deal is on parish Board of Adjustments and politically connected. Land seller also donated $1000 to recently elected council woman in same district. Chairman for P&Z, who negotiates with developer ex parte.

11/2024- 1st post moratorium subdivision plat Gateway farms passed but never built because 36’ cap on fill requires many homes to be built on pier and beam, killing feasibility.
5/2025- Dantin Bruce puts property under contingent contract despite several homes that would require pier and beam construction because low elevation
12/25- new fill ordinance passed by council that provides loophole that circumvents 36’ cap on fill for subdivisions.
1/14/26- Harvest Fields plat postponed because of “technical error” when media shows up. Chairman knows they didn’t have the votes needed to pass. Same day, broker who is also on board of adjustments goes in front of the board of adjustments and gets a ridiculous variance approved to allow 5 dwellings on some non conforming lots in a conservation zone (1 dwelling per acre allowed), all lots below minimum frontage and lot size.

Now- subdivision denied because traffic study abysmal and density is way above what should be allowed since 70% of the property is residential medium intensity but being developed at mix use clip because of some creative calculations not supported by code.

I guess maybe this will help some figure it out for themselves. Why does Dantin Bruce put land under contract that would not be feasible to develop under the exiting fill ordinance, and spend hundreds of thousands on studies and plans unless they know that is about to change just before they present it to P&Z for approval. ??

This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 7:18 pm
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11158 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

and density is way above what should be allowed since 70% of the property is residential medium intensity but being developed at mix use clip because of some creative calculations not supported by code.


I was told that they basically took the total acreage and divided by the number of homes to get some janky numbers. This included using the pipelines and their servitudes, the ponds, the flood zone, everything. But was ruled out because those areas aren't "buildable land" I need to watch the meeting on AP 21 youtube channel.
Posted by lsualum01
Member since Sep 2008
1799 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 6:23 pm to
You would be correct. You should watch the part where one of the P&Z commissioners takes the Planning director to school. She questions his calculations and he responds “that’s the way I’ve always done it.” The audiences bullshite meter pegs out and laughter erupts.
Posted by duckblind56
South of Ellick
Member since Sep 2023
5302 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:56 pm to
When I first built on BV it was a dead end street and like the rest of Ascension Parish, greed took over and they made it a thru street....same as the rest of the parish on the Gonzales side....faux zoning regs, etc. and the flood of housing development/growth without proper infrastructure in place totally screwed the pooch.
Posted by windmill
Prairieville, La
Member since Dec 2005
7803 posts
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:57 am to
Also, I'm surprised to see the family sold that land."

Money- plain and simple. Too much of it to pass up. It's similar to much of what has happened in AP. The owners of land that has been in family for multiple generations simply realize they cannot raise enough cattle on the property in ten generations to compete with the money from simply selling the land now and taking the money.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35867 posts
Posted on 2/14/26 at 7:59 am to
quote:

The owners of land that has been in family for multiple generations simply realize they cannot raise enough cattle on the property in ten generations to compete with the money from simply selling the land now and taking the money.


In their defense, that land was worth something when they sold it. They did the smart thing and secured their future while they had leverage.


Now that land is worthless.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram