Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:Sports
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1798
Registered on:9/17/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
You still haven’t answered the question. If you have a vast majority of 50’ and 60’ lots, without offsetting them with larger lots, and exceed 3:1, how is that compliant? I’m not trying to be a dick. If there is a reasonable explanation then give it to us.
Thank you. And of the ones that are 70’ min frontage, several are <10,500 ft2. minimum lot size. That is 76 lots on about 21.75 acres gross including ponds, roads, servitudes, etc. I’m not an engineer, but even being generous with the net developable land 76/21.75 is certainly > 3:1.
I must have hit a nerve. What is false? That 70’ is minimum frontage for curb and gutter in RM in AP UDLC? That the majority of the plat is 50’ and 60’ frontage? That RM must be developed at 3 dwellings per acre? That the code says land must be developed at its underlying zoning density? What part are you disputing?

You have misunderstood just about everything I have said and your only response is “it complies with RM.” In the history of the AP P&Z I can not find another single instance of a subdivision plat failing unanimously. That’s how bad this plat was. But obviously you’re an engineer and you are smarter than everyone else and it failed because they listened to the lies of the audience ??.
I’m not talking about the adjacent lots. I am talking about the plat. The majority of the lots in the RM area are less than required minimum frontage of 70’ required of RM and that’s why the density is so much higher than allowed because there are so few that are at 70’ or 80’ to offset it.

Either way, I hope the people there keep fighting it. It will set a bad precedent if approved and eventually we will be fighting it near me when they revisit gateway farms or whatever the next iteration will be called. Stop building shitty zero lot homes in flood prone areas.
For a moment, forget about the net developable land.

What is the minimum frontage for RM with curb and gutter? Compare that to the homes from the plat in the underlying area zoned RM. Or you can compare minimum lot ft2.
Bruh. I am giving you the scenario. 76 houses are being put on 20 acres of RM land….I didn’t subtract developable acreage for anything…pipeline servitude that dissects the property, roadways, or drainage pond. How do you end up with 76 lots on 20 acres when it is zoned for 3 dwellings per acre?
Focusing on the part that runs behind the other subdivision….There are 76 houses in 20 acres of RM land. Point me to the code where it says that is allowable? Then there is the whole minimum lot and frontage issue. But enlighten us.
I am assuming you haven’t reviewed the plat or watched the meeting. The developer is way off on the calculations of net developable area, along with code that specifies that land must be developed at its underlying zoning density. The staff’s misinterpretations of this was called out and they were made to look silly. Maybe it was because they were told to stand down, as one of the landowners is buddies with the parish president. You can have 3 dwellings per acre. You can’t take pipeline and drainage servitudes and call them recreation spaces and then come up with your own magical calculations to include them and make the density appear to be less.
You would be correct. You should watch the part where one of the P&Z commissioners takes the Planning director to school. She questions his calculations and he responds “that’s the way I’ve always done it.” The audiences bullshite meter pegs out and laughter erupts.
Well, let’s see if I can set the stage. Land seller is good friends with parish president and has donated about $3800 to his campaigns, including help campaigning and building signs. Nephew is on P&Z. The broker for the deal is on parish Board of Adjustments and politically connected. Land seller also donated $1000 to recently elected council woman in same district. Chairman for P&Z, who negotiates with developer ex parte.

11/2024- 1st post moratorium subdivision plat Gateway farms passed but never built because 36’ cap on fill requires many homes to be built on pier and beam, killing feasibility.
5/2025- Dantin Bruce puts property under contingent contract despite several homes that would require pier and beam construction because low elevation
12/25- new fill ordinance passed by council that provides loophole that circumvents 36’ cap on fill for subdivisions.
1/14/26- Harvest Fields plat postponed because of “technical error” when media shows up. Chairman knows they didn’t have the votes needed to pass. Same day, broker who is also on board of adjustments goes in front of the board of adjustments and gets a ridiculous variance approved to allow 5 dwellings on some non conforming lots in a conservation zone (1 dwelling per acre allowed), all lots below minimum frontage and lot size.

Now- subdivision denied because traffic study abysmal and density is way above what should be allowed since 70% of the property is residential medium intensity but being developed at mix use clip because of some creative calculations not supported by code.

I guess maybe this will help some figure it out for themselves. Why does Dantin Bruce put land under contract that would not be feasible to develop under the exiting fill ordinance, and spend hundreds of thousands on studies and plans unless they know that is about to change just before they present it to P&Z for approval. ??

re: Hire Sheppard .. DC

Posted by lsualum01 on 12/5/25 at 7:04 am to
quote:

It’s asinine to me that a college coach makes more than an NFL coach


It’s asinine that there are high school recruits making more than NFL players, yet here we are.

re: I'm so scared and upset now...

Posted by lsualum01 on 12/1/25 at 7:45 am to
Opposing fans- “Don’t leave Lane, LSU is gonna hurt you. They will fire you in 3 years.”

Also opposing fans- “Don’t trust him LSU fans. He will hurt you and leave you high and dry in 3 years”

Long story short- they don’t care about LSU or LK. They just scared of what’s gonna happen next.
quote:

Ole Miss has been better than LSU in the NIL era.


No shite! That’s why we needed a new coach. Thanks.
Knox Kiffin posting #chargerforlife on an X post recapping the season getting a lot of hate from OM fans at the moment. Sounds like a farewell.

re: Stephen A. from the top rope.

Posted by lsualum01 on 11/26/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I think many blacks, nationally, still view Ole Miss as a racist institution


The one and only time I went to Ole Miss campus for a game there was a KKK rally on campus. This was the infamous game where Jordan Jefferson spikes the ball to end the game.
You think Joey Freshwater trusts someone else with his X account credentials when he’s sliding into girls like Sydney Sweeney’s DM’s?
I think Saban recommended Nutt at the time because he wanted a placeholder if the job with the Dolphins didn’t work out. I don’t know if he has a genuine interest in helping LSU in this search but I don’t believe he has any conflicting reason not to. He is a mentor to Kiffin even if their personalities seem to clash. If anything, I think there is a part of him that doesn’t mind seeing Alabama falter if his ego and legacy are boosted. Even better if at the hands of someone from his coaching tree. Just my uninformed 2 cents.
I would hate the hire. I think what we are seeing now is that with the changes in NIL, you need to hire a coach that can relate to the players and motivate. I don’t think Dabo is a bad coach, but his style is outdated. Not only that, but he is neither an offensive or defensive expert. It’s too hard year after year to keep an excellent offensive and defensive coordinator. Get a coach that can lock down one side and spend to get the best coordinator you can afford on the other side of the ball.
Imagine 30 years later you’re getting close to retirement and your crazy ex wife decides to have the baby and hit you with child support. I realize that won’t be the case here but still kinda wild to think about.