- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone train using heart rate zones
Posted on 1/11/16 at 3:52 pm to KG6
Posted on 1/11/16 at 3:52 pm to KG6
quote:
I've started utilizing the pace clock to really push my 100 and 200 yd intervals instead of just swimming forever.
That same sort of approach can be used on all three disciplines.
Rather than just swimming 1000 yards at a 1:40 pace, you will benefit more from swimming 10 x 100s on a 1:35 pace with 10-15 seconds rest.
So, rather than just running hard (say 5k pace), hit the track and do 400, 800, 1200m intervals at 2 mi effort with a walking or easy jog recovery between each.
Then, maybe a short run at 5k pace and a longer run somewhere on the weekend significantly slower than 5k pace.
Based on the McMillan running calculator ( LINK) here are some target efforts for your different training runs.
So while earlier you said zone 4 feels easy, easy is more like a 9:45 pace. I know, it seems weird but it's one of the biggest mental hurdles people need to get over to see big improvements.
This post was edited on 1/11/16 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 1/11/16 at 3:55 pm to Junky
quote:
Dr. Maffetone suggest you subtract your age from 180 and just train at that HR. It is incredibly hard to do, but you won't get injured with a proper diet as well.
He's coached Mark Allen to victory.
That science is decades old. Just about every top coach in the world believes in protocol testing to develop training and racing thresholds now.
It doesn't mean that people who have used that method and still use that method can't be or get fast, just that most of the science now believes in a more structured test. What you don't hear when you read about someones success stories are their failure stories as well.
Take Brett Sutton for example. He has coached multiple world champions, but his approach is so brutal that the numbers of athletes he spits up and chews out is astonishing. Assuming he accpepts you in the first place, then if you survive the amount of volume he puts on you and can handle his abuse you may end up being one of the best in the world, and he has had a few (Chrissie Wellington) but his athletes have been known to get worn out very fast.
This post was edited on 1/11/16 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 1/11/16 at 4:05 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
That science is decades old. Just about every top coach in the world believes in protocol testing to develop training and racing thresholds now.
Maybe, but it worked didn't it? I absolutely HATE the ole "it's old so it's useless" mantra. HIIT is all the rage these days; I’m not saying it doesn’t work.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 4:08 pm to Junky
quote:
it worked didn't it?
Dave Scott had exactly the opposite approach, are you saying his didn't work?
The point is some people succeed in spite of their training and others because of it. Just because it worked for one person doesn't mean it is "right".
Allen was ahead of his time in regards to training in alot of ways, but there is too much science out there to ignore it and put all your eggs in one basket because it worked for Mark Allen 30 years ago. If that was the case, there would be no evolution in the sport and how ti is approached.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 4:26 pm to LSUfan4444
Some of the HR monitors have been shown to be wildly inaccurate. A recent story showed Fitbit strapped to an orange and registering a HR of like 60bpm
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:11 pm to yellowfin
quote:
That's a hell of a resting heart rate
Yea I'm calling bullshite on that. That's Olympic athlete level resting heart rate.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:13 pm to Pax Regis
Mine is 40-43 usually. Especially around April/May.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:15 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
Yea I'm calling bullshite on that. That's Olympic athlete level resting heart rate.
no, no its not.
when i was seriously racing my resting HR was easily in the 40s.
all that means is you train so much that when you kick back your heart goes into resting mode.
it takes work and time to achieve that, but to say only an olympic athlete can achieve that is just nonsense.
i knew a couple guys who were in the high 30s.
eta not sure if its something about racing bikes and the amount of time you're training and doing efforts, but i suspect lower resting HRs are more prevalent in that sport.
This post was edited on 1/11/16 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:26 pm to CAD703X
I just sat down for one minute and checked my pulse. 50bom. Lying down rested, I would easily be low 40's.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:30 pm to LSUfan4444
My max is 204 ... or was it 206? Did a max hr test (do it every 6 months or so). My zone 2 is zone 5 for some people but the formula is WAY off for me for sure.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:32 pm to Junky
.
Tried it. I basically never ran.
quote:
Maffetone suggest you subtract your age from 180 and just train at that HR. It is incredibly hard to do, but you won't get injured with a proper diet as well.
Tried it. I basically never ran.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:34 pm to tiger91
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:44 pm to Pax Regis
That 45 rate was taken at the doctors office. I rarely take my true resting rate but if I throw my monitor on, I can get into the low 50s high 40s sitting on the couch easily. That's not a true indicator of performance. Your lactic threshold along with you hearts efficiency to keep up with it is an indicator of performance. I have no threshold at this point. I realize that.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:50 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
ea I'm calling bullshite on that. That's Olympic athlete level resting heart rate.
What makes an olympic athlete isn't how low their resting HR is, it's how high, how long and how close to their max HR they can compete.
I haven't been able to donate blood for about 10 years due to such a low resting HR...low 40s regularly but i've seen under 40 before.
This post was edited on 1/11/16 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:52 pm to KG6
Sounds like you're on the arse-end of a heart attack.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:53 pm to KG6
My dad does when he rides his bike. He's getting old.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:53 pm to KG6
Can I say something?
Weight lifting is anaerobic. And is meant for gaining muscle.
Jogging is aerobic (one example). And is meant for physical upkeep.
When someone says "work out" I never consider that to be running. I always think of muscle gaining.
Running to me is just a necessity to keep my body in condition. Working out is to add onto the physical look of the body.
Just my opinion of how I see it. I'm a literal person, so I see things as 1s and 0s sometimes. Take it for what it's worth.
Weight lifting is anaerobic. And is meant for gaining muscle.
Jogging is aerobic (one example). And is meant for physical upkeep.
When someone says "work out" I never consider that to be running. I always think of muscle gaining.
Running to me is just a necessity to keep my body in condition. Working out is to add onto the physical look of the body.
Just my opinion of how I see it. I'm a literal person, so I see things as 1s and 0s sometimes. Take it for what it's worth.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 5:55 pm to Pectus
Lifting weights "can" be much better for weight lose than running. When you run, your burning calories while running. When you lift, your burning calories the entire time your muscle is rebuilding itself. So in a sense, weight lifting can be an upkeep.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:02 pm to LSUfan4444
The point of Maffetone's way is to run at an aerobic pace and never get into the anaerobic zone. Once you hit that anaerobic zone, your starting to use glucose as the main fuel source and not fats (hence the 180 minus age). You never hit a bonk, and never need any gels or foods to bring along if you stay aerobic.
I've done it and was fun & very hard at first. I have since moved away from running and into weights. I figured the OP has never heard of him and it is quite a story.
I've done it and was fun & very hard at first. I have since moved away from running and into weights. I figured the OP has never heard of him and it is quite a story.
Posted on 1/11/16 at 6:04 pm to Pectus
I dont say I'm going workout, but I consider what I did "a workout".
Like just now I swam 300yd warm up, 10x 100yd free, 5x 200yd free, and 2x 400yd pull. That's a bit more that just "going for a swim". I call that a workout.
Like just now I swam 300yd warm up, 10x 100yd free, 5x 200yd free, and 2x 400yd pull. That's a bit more that just "going for a swim". I call that a workout.
This post was edited on 1/11/16 at 6:10 pm
Popular
Back to top



0




