Started By
Message

re: Any OTers had surgery for an enlarged prostate?

Posted on 12/1/25 at 8:50 pm to
Posted by Passing Wind
Dutchtown
Member since Apr 2015
4736 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

mine was 100g
Posted by uscpuke
Member since Jan 2004
6187 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 8:56 pm to
Elephantiasis got me feeling low.
Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired - 31 years
Member since Feb 2019
6082 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 8:59 pm to
I can't take Flomax, what are some other meds for BPH? I read that .5mg of Cialis is commonly prescribed, anything else?
Posted by CSinLC
Member since May 2018
2059 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

His office staff talked me through removing it myself.


WHAT THE HELL!
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
22378 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Man the OT is aging.


Yeah and this is another thing you youngsters won't be able to dodge with the correct diet and five days in the gym.
Posted by Mr Happy
Member since May 2019
2348 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

I had laser prostate surgery a couple of years ago

Can you recommended a urologist?
Posted by Nole Man
Somewhere In Tennessee!
Member since May 2011
8631 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:33 pm to
I had two neighbors that had TURP. One had a serious infection and had to wear a catheter. The other had an infection that lead to a heart attack and he nearly died. Both are fine now.

No thank you.

Mine was large and eventually I had to do something. After a lot of research I opted for a PAE (Prostatic Artery Embolization), a minimally invasive procedure used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which is the non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate that often causes urinary problems in men as they age.

I’m 4 months out and things are greatly improving. AND..everything still works!! You need to find an interventional radiologist that can do it.

A summary from CoPilot.
---

Why PAE Is Good for Prostate Issues

Minimally Invasive

• Performed through a small catheter inserted into the arteries that supply the prostate.
• No surgical incision, so recovery is faster and less painful compared to traditional surgery (like TURP).


Effective Symptom Relief

• Shrinks the prostate by reducing blood flow, which eases pressure on the urethra.
• Improves urinary flow, reduces frequency (especially at night), and decreases urgency.


Lower Risk of Side Effects

• Less likely to cause sexual dysfunction (erectile issues or retrograde ejaculation) compared to surgical options.
• Lower risk of bleeding and infection.

Outpatient or Short Stay

• Often done as an outpatient procedure or with a short hospital stay.
• Recovery time is typically days rather than weeks.

Alternative for High-Risk Patients

• Suitable for men who cannot undergo surgery due to age, heart conditions, or other medical risks.

---

Things to Consider

• Not every patient is a candidate — depends on prostate size, anatomy, and overall health.
• Long-term data is still being collected; TURP and laser procedures have more decades of outcome data.
• Requires specialized interventional radiologists, so availability may be limited in some areas.

---

Quick Summary

PAE is good because it offers a minimally invasive, lower-risk alternative to surgery for prostate enlargement, with strong symptom relief and faster recovery.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 10:35 pm
Posted by ronniep1
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2016
638 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 11:39 pm to
In April or early May, I had a surgery known as TURP (Transurethral Resection of the Prostate). As I understood the procedure, excess tissue had grown into the channel or area in which urine passes, thus hindering my ability to pee. It sometimes took 3 - 5 minutes, and even then, my bladder did not feel completely empty.

My surgeon went in with a laser and zapped that excess tissue, and life's been good since then. The only real inconvenience was leaving the surgery center with a catheter, and having to use it for 3 or so days afterward.

Thank goodness for modern medicine, as something as routine and normal as trying to pee had become a miserable and frustrating experience.
Posted by Classy Doge
Member since Nov 2021
4519 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Can you recommended a urologist?
Choose the one with the smallest fingers. Trust me on that one.
Posted by ronniep1
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2016
638 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 11:44 pm to
Removing the catheter wasn't pleasant, but neither was it painful. Only slightly uncomfortable. A nurse did it, and took only a minute or two.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
50762 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

The circumstances of a ball point pen.
Under that circumstance, the catheter being the circumference of a Bic pen would worry me, too!
Posted by BK Lounge
Member since Nov 2021
5016 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

Choose the one with the smallest fingers. Trust me on that one.




Ak-shu-al-lee there is no finger up the arse required these days .


Had my prostate checked at a hospital in Asia last year.. the hospital looked & felt more like a Four Seasons hotel than a hospital.. nurses all spoke perfect English .. they did bloodwork, urinalysis , other tests and an ultrasound .. turns out my prostate is slightly enlarged (im mid 40s, so i gotta keep an eye on that).. my PSA #s are good.. I learned there is zero correlation between an enlarged prostate and prostate cancer.. and also they dont treat an enlarged prostate , they only treat the symptoms, if you have them… the Dr spoke broken English, and when i mentioned to him id heard that dietary changes can help shrink the prostate, he said “No ! Only way to stop prostate getting bigger is stop getting older ! You die !! .. Or you get Time Machine, you go back in time, prostate get smaller !!”… it was comical, but i got the point .

Even though i have travel insurance, i paid out of pocket, and the whole thing- consultation with Dr, ultrasound, bloodwork, etc- cost me $105 usd , all-in.. US healthcare is a scam by comparison .

Oh, and luckily there was no catheter insertion involved ………….
Posted by Rabby
Member since Mar 2021
1473 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:37 am to
quote:

WHAT THE HELL!
True. The doc was out doing emergency surgery so one of his people called to say there was no point in driving into the office. They could do it the next day or talk me through it then. Was not rocket science.
Posted by SideshowBob00
Member since Sep 2022
24 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Were you having any particular symptoms prior to surgery ?


Never had any symptoms. Was being monitored for several years due to PSA steadily climbing. After last jump from 15 to 22 in 6 months they did MRI and another biopsy and found cancerous tumor this time. No pain before, no urination issues, … kinda scary that this might have gone undetected if not for a random blood test a few years ago

Posted by JEC119
Alabama
Member since Apr 2024
2145 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

Under that circumstance, the catheter being the circumference of a Bic pen would worry me, too!


lol yea that too…damn I missed thst mistake bad.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
14898 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

an enlarged prostrate removed robotiacally.


So, Tobor the great cut it out?

Isn’t a physician guiding it? How is robotic surgery any better?
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
70507 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:55 pm to

Posted by swampgrizzly
Member since May 2014
132 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:19 pm to
Thanks for you service, Greenbean. I can't tolerate Flomax and some of it's similar meds. Since I had problems with Flomax and because of my history with kidney stones my urologist wanted to try reducing the size of my prostate to help stones pass more freely in the future, so he prescribed Finasteride which somehow very gradually shrinks the prostate. Though my PSA number.was never that high, my PSA numbers have gradually decreased 60% over the last 2 and a half years!

In addition to treating an enlarged prostate, Finasteride is commonly prescribed to help with male pattern baldness. My barber said I won't have to worry about going bald!

The negative side: You may experience a decreased libido and volume of ejaculate! At age 79, I was already experiencing that before taking Finasteride from natural aging issues, but my libido and volume issue still work enough to satisfy my needs!!! And I no long have had problems with kidney stones!!!!!
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 11:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram