ronniep1

I've only seen Erika on TV a few times since Charlie's assassination. Mainly because I have a life, and things to do, besides monitoring Erika and her appearances/statements around the clock. With that said, I think this is reasonably satirical of what I've seen.

I sincerely hope that Erika is a good person, a woman of deep faith, and a fantastic mom to her children. Assuming she is those things, and more, though, doesn't mean she is the right person to pick up Charlie's mantle and lead Turning Point. Maybe it's the beauty pageant background and demeanor still coming through, but Erika's appearances that I've seen have appeared artificial, overly produced, and scripted or rehearsed. Turning Point, I believe, would be better served by having someone who appears more natural and relaxed speaking for the organization.

This is only one opinion, and from past experience, I know some will disagree and "let me have it" below. I look forward to those discussions, and the possibility of changing my mind.

At one point in time, it was me, and 4 menstruating girls/women in my house. I recall going to Wal-Mart almost on a weekly basis for a "giant economy pack" of Charmin.

Now it's just me and the wife, so TP usage is much more reasonable.

Count me as doubtful that Wade returns, but since so many will be ready to jump from tall buildings and bridges if he doesn't, I'm trying to temper what will be sky high expectations.

There are those, I know, who will say "Final Four or bust," but IMO, that is unreasonable. So what woukd be a REASONABLE expectation?

Didn't Bush 43 or Obama sign legislation allowing women 2 days, or 48 hours, after birth?

Tarzan The Ape Man from 1981. Not even a naked Bo Derek was enough to keep me in the theater for that train wreck of a film.

Based on the last few times I drove past Blue Bayou when it was open, I hope they installed an oil skinmer, or something else to filter out the hair products used by democratic clientele.

Don't stick your d_ck in either ugly or crazy.

This beotch meets BOTH criteria.

If you are a squatted truck owner, or know one, I, as an older guy, have 2 questions: (1) Is it hard to keep the vehicle in a lane of traffic since you're looking up, rather than down the road? and (2) How difficult is it to drive at night, since your lights are pointed skyward instead of shining horizontally to the road?

I've been a fan of lots of automotive fads or trends through the years, and I've been a licensed driver for 50 of my 65 years, but I don't see the purpose or appeal of squatting a truck. Maybe that means I've officially reached "old geezer" territory, but if it does, on this topic, I'm okay with it and willing to live with that designation.

This goes back 20 or so years, but I also bought a car from an individual in Atlanta (friend of my brother). I too had a notarized bill of sale and the car's Georgia title.

When I took those things to the state office of motor vehicles, I had to call my brother and have the seller send me a copy of his Georgia driver's license. The reason I was given is that Louisiana's OMV had to ensure that the seller had not moved to Louisiana, driven the car here, and sold it without him registering it here before selling it to me.

Or in other words, the OMV had to ensure the buyer and I had not defrauded the state out of $160 ($4,000 car price x 4% state sales tax at that time).

It took HOURS to do this, and by the time I finally left, I was beyond pissed off, and I let one beotch in particular know what I thought of her for wasting so much time over $160.

So cutting to TLDR, get a copy of your seller's driver's license, just in case some dumbass at OMV wants/needs it.

It seems as if they don't miss from 3 point range.