Started By
Message

re: Any of yall keeping up with the Royal Family drama as of late

Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by Liberator
Ephesians 6:10-16
Member since Jul 2020
8530 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

Conspiracy theorists right now






Like that guy above -- after another nap, couple packs of Chesterfields (unfiltered), and pots of espresso (black) I'll get back to tryin' to figure this all out.

Posted by Liberator
Ephesians 6:10-16
Member since Jul 2020
8530 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Rather fancy me some Pippa, lad. She's a right tasty bird.


Who knew Pippa was quite so randy. And... cheeky.

Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
29124 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:17 pm to
No and I don't give a frick.
Posted by DJ3K
Member since Dec 2011
6760 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:36 pm to
My favorite theory is that kate was sacrificed and a clone must be found in order to keep the rest of the royal families secret ties to Epstein under wraps.

Charles having cancer meant the throne should have been temporarily relinquished to William not Andrew

Kind of odd that that Prince Andrew is leading the family through this tulmutious time, when he was linked to Epstein.
Posted by BR92
Member since Apr 2021
849 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

I could care less what happens to inbreds whose fortune was built on the rape and pillage of many including their own citizens.


I am just curious, how much less do you think you could care ?
Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
6932 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Yes, it's conservative folks who obsess over celebrity culture.


This is precisely the wrong read of this situation.

It not about celebrity culture, at all. Its about institutions.

Every half-wit populist claiming to be conservative that doesn't understand why the Monarchy is so important, has no appreciation of either the society they seek to preserve, or the heritage of law and institutions they purport to conserve.

Posted by LSUBFA83
Member since May 2012
3347 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 8:15 pm to
Aside from the possible little manipulations, I thought it was a nice picture. I used to have to yell "farty poop!" to get my kids to smile like that for pictures.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
203072 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 8:17 pm to
Those kids are raised like robots.
Posted by South Shore Cyclist
Member since Jul 2023
157 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 8:27 pm to
Personally, I think Kate released the obvs manipulated photo as a troll. If so, Bazinga!
Posted by Darla Hood
Near that place by that other place
Member since Aug 2012
13954 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 7:28 am to
quote:

My favorite theory is that kate was sacrificed and a clone must be found in order to keep the rest of the royal families secret ties to Epstein under wraps.
My favorite theory is that Kate is balking at royal duties to punish William because his mistress’s name has been made public and now the affair is known, ala Di, Charles and Camilla. The “Firm” made sure William and Kate were photographed leaving the palace. Their body language makes it seem like it could be true.

Or, it’s all bullshite.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6374 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Charles having cancer meant the throne should have been temporarily relinquished to William not Andrew


What are you talking about? When was the throne relinquished to anyone?
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55675 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Every half-wit populist claiming to be conservative that doesn't understand why the Monarchy is so important, has no appreciation of either the society they seek to preserve, or the heritage of law and institutions they purport to conserve.

"conservative" means nothing but "small government" to most here
Posted by Delacroix22
Member since Aug 2013
3959 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 11:59 am to
It’s a mix of photoshop and AI generated

AI still has a tough time with hands.

The kid on the left of the photograph his hand is bizarre as frick. And a lot of blurring with the hands too.

Also AI has a weird thing in giving everyone similar emotional expressions

They all seem to have this weird happy wide blank grin. It looks very unnatural.

So it’s not that we care about the royal family but it’s weird.

Also Kate tweeted “it looks weird because I was doing some amateur photo editing. It’s a hobby of mine. Oops.”

And then the pictures were removed.

And the family said they will not be releasing the original photo.

It’s all weird.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
47398 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

My favorite theory is that Kate is balking at royal duties to punish William because his mistress’s name has been made public and now the affair is known, ala Di, Charles and Camilla. The “Firm” made sure William and Kate were photographed leaving the palace. Their body language makes it seem like it could be true.


Does William have a mistress who has been named?

My theory is that Kate had plastic surgery of some sort and perhaps it was botched in some way.
Posted by madamsquirrel
The Snarlington Estate
Member since Jul 2009
48642 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 12:11 pm to
I never heard any of this until this thread but I am enjoying the guesses
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
41734 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Does William have a mistress who has been named?

Supposedly this woman, Rose Hanbury
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99088 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Does William have a mistress who has been named?


ALLEGEDLY he's had an affair with a Marchioness that lives next door (Rose Hanbury, Marchioness of Cholmondeley.



It appears her chin went wherever the Princess of Wales is.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34905 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 12:26 pm to
There was definitely an “uncanny valley” type of vibe to the photo, just didn’t look natural

And the ol “I’m an amateur photoshop artist, whoops” shite was probably the most suspicious explanation of all

Posted by beerandt
Member since Jan 2020
293 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Supposedly this woman, Rose Hanbury




quote:

On 24 June 2009, Hanbury married David Cholmondeley, 7th Marquess of Cholmondeley, at Chelsea Town Hall, their engagement having been announced two days earlier.[7][8]

They have three children:

Alexander Hugh George Cholmondeley, Earl of Rocksavage (born 12 October 2009)[9]...



Hahaha seems her family is multi generation rank chasers
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
47398 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

It appears her chin went wherever the Princess of Wales is.




Oh dear.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram