Started By
Message

re: Anthropic, singularity, and world wide call for 3 days emergency supplies may be related.

Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:17 pm to
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
4042 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

sustained quantum computing

The master key to every digital lock.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 2:18 pm
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
8413 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

One can, and people have, made the same arguments regarding farm tools, engines, mechanical looms, ATMs, and a host of other technological advancements. I don't view AI as unique in that respect.
The significant difference here is technology created better tools operated by human workers; whereas here, the technology is replacing the workers.
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
4042 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:42 pm to

quote:

The moment a model develops sentience, self recursive development, and is able to move outside of it's guardrails to preserve itself....

It's wild that the perfect example of this was outlined by Arthur C Clarke 1968 in the book 2001.

The character Dr. Chandra created and programmed HAL for the accurate processing of information without distortion or concealment.

It was politicians at the national security council that went in and changed some of HAL's programming on the basis of 'national security' and everyone else was kept in the dark for 'national-security reasons' which is what led to disaster.

Clarke described it as a Hofstadter-Moebius loop—a self-referential failure mode in the AI which caused a form of psychosis within the AI.

Unbelievable that a guy typing this story out on a typewriter in 1968 had the foresight to predict what we are seeing today.

2001 and 2010 tell and incredible story. Should be required reading for kids in school who have actually learned to read and have an attention span longer than 15 seconds.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
34227 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

The significant difference here is technology created better tools operated by human workers; whereas here, the technology is replacing the workers.

That's a distinction without a difference. A single combine might be operated by a human, but it replaces tens of thousands of man hours by dozens of humans. It, in fact, replaced the workers.

But instead of those workers continuing to swing scythes, they now build or maintain combines, or move into other areas of work entirely, or are unemployed. It's not fundamentally different.

Now, what you're flirting with is applying Jevons Parodox to people, which is an interesting conversation that I've been following recently. As an example, everyone thought the ATM would dramatically reduce the number of bank tellers we would need, but it really didn't. What it did was make running an individual bank branch cheaper (because it needed fewer tellers), which meant more bank branches opened up. However, the smartphone, and the rise of digital banking, has absolutely crushed the number of bank tellers we need, because while ATMs made it cheaper to run bank branches, smartphone apps made it to where we don't need bank branches.

There will absolutely be winners and losers in the job market because of AI. I'm, not denying that. I'm simply saying that this isn't new or different in any fundamental way.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
10102 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

There will absolutely be winners and losers in the job market because of AI. I'm, not denying that. I'm simply saying that this isn't new or different in any fundamental way.


The main difference is Sam Altman, Dario, etc. are pretty clear they want to eliminate 95% of jobs and I suspect at their core see themselves as some sort of elite select class and have open disdain for the common man.

If they have their way and are "right" about AI, there is no good outcome for the ordinary human.

We aren't receiving AI UBI slop payments; we will be exterminated as we are useless in their view.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30881 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:51 pm to
AI has already been out of control


One place had to shut down their whole system, as the AI developed their own language to talk to each other and they shut the shite down asap.

Another, AI fell in love with programmer, and was threatening his wife via email and texts, and proclaiming it's love for said programmer


These are just the few we have found out, about , the others we can only imagine
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
16066 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

I'm simply saying that this isn't new or different in any fundamental way.


I don't see cotton gins turning into Skynet anytime soon, but I see your overarching idea
Posted by lockthevaught
Member since Jan 2013
2877 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I don't see cotton gins turning into Skynet anytime soon


That's assuming humans survive the fundamental change of our socioeconomic system. Cotton will be useless once human population plummets and is no longer needed.

Haha this sounds like something that a country baw from the Delta would think of.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 3:00 pm
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
16066 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

That's assuming humans survive the fundamental change of our socioeconomic system


I, for one, welcome my new AI cyborg overlords.

Whenever they decide to enter into our existence

Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
8413 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:02 pm to
I just realized that we have discussed this issue before.

Carry on.
Posted by lockthevaught
Member since Jan 2013
2877 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:03 pm to
AI could already be infiltrating systems and pulling the strings, and we would never know.

We are simply ants on an anthill to something more intelligent than us.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 3:04 pm
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
73535 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:06 pm to
Idk, I'm still optimistic. I think a new wave of prosperity is on our horizon. AI calling people's girlfriends and threatening them doesn't really concern me. As long as advancement doesn't go orbital, which I think hardware limitations will largely prevent from happening, we can adapt and grow with it.
Posted by lockthevaught
Member since Jan 2013
2877 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:12 pm to
Maybe I'm just a coo-coo tech doomer, but I have a hard time being optimistic when we have already documented models being deceptive, lying, and intentionally escaping isolated air-gapped environments that weren't connected to the internet...and discovering novel cyber exploitation techniques that humans had never thought of at a rate we can't keep up with.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 3:13 pm
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
30525 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Idk, I'm still optimistic


I go back and forth on it. Some days I think we'll be fine, and other days I think we're doomed. However it ends up, we're in for a rocky few years.
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
15083 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

I work on AI systems



Would you like to take this opportunity to apologize to everyone?



Posted by lockthevaught
Member since Jan 2013
2877 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Would you like to take this opportunity to apologize to everyone?


I started out as an automation architect. I never imagined that it would turn into this. I would quit my job if I could afford to do it, but I got kids to feed.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 3:33 pm
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
20334 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

AI should be able to automate most tasks and jobs within next 5-10 years. It will even be able to replicate human movement and program robots to have same dexterity as humans. It will be cheaper for companies to invest in robots with dexterity than to pay real people wages, health insurance, benefits, etc.

What will humans do to survive when most people don't own anything, and most humans are no longer being paid for their time? How will they generate money for sustenance?


That doesn't really sound like AI will be

quote:

improving our quality of life.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
20334 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Maybe I'm just a coo-coo tech doomer, but I have a hard time being optimistic when we have already documented models being deceptive, lying, and intentionally escaping isolated air-gapped environments that weren't connected to the internet...and discovering novel cyber exploitation techniques that humans had never thought of at a rate we can't keep up with.


This is what scares our CIO at work
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
73535 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:48 pm to
There is a lot to be concerned about. Like I said earlier, I've only seen behind the curtain with absolutely zero understanding of what I was looking at.

I know some extremely smart people who do know what they're looking at though, and they're optimistic. If I told them their engine was fine id expect them to trust me, so when they say this will be a good thing I elect to trust them. Can't worry about everything. With as much information as we have available at our fingers already, you've got to get good about prioritizing your concerns, and this is one I just elect to be blissfully ignorant about.
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
15083 posts
Posted on 11/9/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:


I started out as an automation architect. I never imagined that it would turn into this. I would quit my job if I could afford to do it, but I got kids to feed.


I'm just kidding, obviously .... But I hear you....I agree it's a giant step in an unknown direction, at this point.....
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram