- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
An Artificial Intelligence Developed Its Own Non-Human Language
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:38 am
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:38 am
LINK
The Singularity is Near
quote:
A buried line in a new Facebook report about chatbots’ conversations with one another offers a remarkable glimpse at the future of language.
In the report, researchers at the Facebook Artificial Intelligence Research lab describe using machine learning to train their “dialog agents” to negotiate. (And it turns out bots are actually quite good at dealmaking.) At one point, the researchers write, they had to tweak one of their models because otherwise the bot-to-bot conversation “led to divergence from human language as the agents developed their own language for negotiating.” They had to use what’s called a fixed supervised model instead.
In other words, the model that allowed two bots to have a conversation—and use machine learning to constantly iterate strategies for that conversation along the way—led to those bots communicating in their own non-human language. If this doesn’t fill you with a sense of wonder and awe about the future of machines and humanity then, I don’t know, go watch Blade Runner or something.
The Singularity is Near
17
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:39 am to OMLandshark
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:42 am to OMLandshark
quote:
led to those bots communicating in their own non-human language.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:42 am to OMLandshark
...Or there was a glitch in the programming that caused the computers to spew a string of gibberish. But it was probably the computers coming to life thing.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:43 am to OMLandshark
quote:
led to those bots communicating in their own non-human language
So, they have no earthly idea what the two bots were talking about?
We're fricking doomed.
<<<<<<<<<<<<
They were planning the attack. It's just like my grandparents and parents speaking French when I was growing up and there was something they didn't want me to know.
This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 11:44 am
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:43 am to OMLandshark
well we're fricked
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:46 am to OMLandshark
quote:
At one point, the researchers write, they had to tweak one of their models because otherwise the bot-to-bot conversation “led to divergence from human language as the agents developed their own language for negotiating.”
I just peed a little.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:47 am to OMLandshark
quote:
If this doesn’t fill you with a sense of wonder and awe about the future of machines and humanity
Less wonder and more terror.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:48 am to OMLandshark
Pig Latin, ftw.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:48 am to OMLandshark
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:50 am to OMLandshark
We've had so many AI takeover threads recently
. The end is coming.This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 11:51 am
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:51 am to OMLandshark
I've wondered in recent years if it would be possible for AI (or some sort of App) that could produce music based on the songs input into it.
For example, if all of the songs from the Abbey Road album were input, could AI (or whatever) produce a new song of similar quality?
For example, if all of the songs from the Abbey Road album were input, could AI (or whatever) produce a new song of similar quality?
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:54 am to J Murdah
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:56 am to OMLandshark
quote:
If this doesn’t fill you with a sense of dread about the future of machines and humanity
FIFY
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:57 am to Jim Rockford
I always have a hard time wrapping my head around the notion that a machine could ever actually acquire a will to exist, and better yet, to replicate/reproduce.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:59 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I always have a hard time wrapping my head around the notion that a machine could ever actually acquire a will to exist, and better yet, to replicate/reproduce.
a very simple way to think of it is with a lower-level organism like a virus
then think about computer viruses that do "replicate/reproduce"
i think flipping that and asking why we have those concepts is the better/bigger question. evolution hard-wired lots of these concepts into us. is it possible that a non-organic form of intelligence could/would follow that path?
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:01 pm to OMLandshark
We. Are. fricked.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:15 pm to OMLandshark
The future is near.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:19 pm to Aux Arc
quote:
Or there was a glitch in the programming that caused the computers to spew a string of gibberish.
Suspiciously what an ally of the machines would say...
This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:33 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I always have a hard time wrapping my head around the notion that a machine could ever actually acquire a will to exist, and better yet, to replicate/reproduce.
"Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!"
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News