- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alleged video of Ahmaud Arbery shooting leaks
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:30 pm to El Magnifico
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:30 pm to El Magnifico
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 4:36 am
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:30 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
If they wanted to shoot him before the confrontation they would have just shot him, not gone to all the trouble to redirect him and all that. They would have started shooting as he’s running towards the stopped vehicle.
Christ on a cracker man. You really need to log off.
If they went to the trouble of boxing in a person who they had absolutely no proof was connected to a robbery, why do they get the benefit of the doubt with regard to the reasonableness of their actions? I mean, it seems to me that defending yourself from a guy who stepped out of the car when you go past him, who is holding a gun, is more reasonable than boxing in a dude you think may have a gun because a similar black guy touched his pants two nights ago. But why you are ascribing extreme reasonableness to these dudes and not giving the same benefit to the victim, is again, extremely curious.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:31 pm to El Magnifico
As has been stated dozens of times in this thread, even if he was guilty of everything these people claim, it doesn't mean these people are allowed to hunt him down and kill him
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:31 pm to El Magnifico
Except it’s always used in an insulting way. Sometimes it’s deserved, this time it has 0 relevance to this case
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:31 pm to El Magnifico
quote:
It's a figure of speech. It means he wasn't doing anything wrong.
Is that the context its used in, generally? Please be honest.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm to Salmon
quote:
considering the 911 transcripts have been discussed throughout the thread, I have no idea why you think the 911 calls are "new facts"
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm to El Magnifico
quote:
It's a figure of speech. It means he wasn't doing anything wrong.
Well, you're right. All evidence does tend to support that Arbery wasn't doing anything wrong.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm to El Magnifico
quote:
Never said it did. Just giving more information on the young man.

Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:38 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I'm sorry, Salmon. I have literally been on a series of conference calls for work for the past three hours. I haven't had the chance to go back and catch up with everything since I left the thread at 9:30 this morning.
the 911 transcripts have been discussed right when this started yesterday
if 1 person got some facts wrong this morning, so be it, but don't act like the 911 calls are some new information that the majority of the thread have ignored
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:41 pm to jchamil
No way to justify this. Even if he did something wrong, get on your cell phone first, and call law enforcement. Even if the man that was killed is proven to have done something illegal, these two guys need to spend a lot of time in jail.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:49 pm to TIGER2
quote:
No way to justify this. Even if he did something wrong, get on your cell phone first, and call law enforcement. Even if the man that was killed is proven to have done something illegal, these two guys need to spend a lot of time in jail.
Exactly. I don't know why this is so hard for some to understand.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:50 pm to TIGER2
Exactly. Even assuming the worst possible version of the guy shot and the best intentions of the shooter still doesn't excuse what happened. If they did not witness a crime, the apprehension of a suspect is not their responsibility or right.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:52 pm to Salmon
I made a wrong assumption that a call wasn’t made before/during the pursuit. That’s my fault. I thought it was just the one call.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:53 pm to El Magnifico
Does not warrant be fricking murdered you imbecile. By that standard you are implying that it is ok for people to be shot and killed as long as they have a prior incident as small as that.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:54 pm to TIGER2
quote:
No way to justify this. Even if he did something wrong, get on your cell phone first, and call law enforcement. Even if the man that was killed is proven to have done something illegal, these two guys need to spend a lot of time in jail.
Yep. If that’s the case then I can go around Shreveport shooting people that are rumored to have prior criminal activity.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:55 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:
Does not warrant be fricking murdered you imbecile. By that standard you are implying that it is ok for people to be shot and killed as long as they have a prior incident as small as that.
Yeah the priors are pretty irrelevant in this case.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:55 pm to Salmon
Sorry man. I’ll go back to trolling mask threads. Out of my element here.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:57 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:
If that’s the case then I can go around Shreveport shooting people that are rumored to have prior criminal activity.
I have this shitty neighbor that I'm sure has shoplifted at some point, just sayin'
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:58 pm to The Pirate King
Not to mention he’s referencing something that happened 6 years ago. Do rehabilitation and redemption not exist anymore? Is everyone forever a criminal who has ever done something like that? Stupid as hell
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 12:58 pm
Popular
Back to top



0







