Started By
Message

re: Alleged video of Ahmaud Arbery shooting leaks

Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by msutiger
Houston
Member since Jul 2008
71407 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:30 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 4:36 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39167 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

If they wanted to shoot him before the confrontation they would have just shot him, not gone to all the trouble to redirect him and all that. They would have started shooting as he’s running towards the stopped vehicle.





Christ on a cracker man. You really need to log off.

If they went to the trouble of boxing in a person who they had absolutely no proof was connected to a robbery, why do they get the benefit of the doubt with regard to the reasonableness of their actions? I mean, it seems to me that defending yourself from a guy who stepped out of the car when you go past him, who is holding a gun, is more reasonable than boxing in a dude you think may have a gun because a similar black guy touched his pants two nights ago. But why you are ascribing extreme reasonableness to these dudes and not giving the same benefit to the victim, is again, extremely curious.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm
Posted by FAP SAM
Member since Sep 2014
3237 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:31 pm to
As has been stated dozens of times in this thread, even if he was guilty of everything these people claim, it doesn't mean these people are allowed to hunt him down and kill him
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24456 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:31 pm to
Except it’s always used in an insulting way. Sometimes it’s deserved, this time it has 0 relevance to this case
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39167 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

It's a figure of speech. It means he wasn't doing anything wrong.



Is that the context its used in, generally? Please be honest.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62417 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

considering the 911 transcripts have been discussed throughout the thread, I have no idea why you think the 911 calls are "new facts"


I'm sorry, Salmon. I have literally been on a series of conference calls for work for the past three hours. I haven't had the chance to go back and catch up with everything since I left the thread at 9:30 this morning.
Posted by Rep520
Member since Mar 2018
10476 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

It's a figure of speech. It means he wasn't doing anything wrong.


Well, you're right. All evidence does tend to support that Arbery wasn't doing anything wrong.
Posted by TexasTiger90
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Jul 2014
3576 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Never said it did. Just giving more information on the young man.

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85378 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

I'm sorry, Salmon. I have literally been on a series of conference calls for work for the past three hours. I haven't had the chance to go back and catch up with everything since I left the thread at 9:30 this morning.



the 911 transcripts have been discussed right when this started yesterday

if 1 person got some facts wrong this morning, so be it, but don't act like the 911 calls are some new information that the majority of the thread have ignored
Posted by TIGER2
Mandeville.La
Member since Jan 2006
10508 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:41 pm to
No way to justify this. Even if he did something wrong, get on your cell phone first, and call law enforcement. Even if the man that was killed is proven to have done something illegal, these two guys need to spend a lot of time in jail.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21106 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

No way to justify this. Even if he did something wrong, get on your cell phone first, and call law enforcement. Even if the man that was killed is proven to have done something illegal, these two guys need to spend a lot of time in jail.


Exactly. I don't know why this is so hard for some to understand.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33892 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:50 pm to
Exactly. Even assuming the worst possible version of the guy shot and the best intentions of the shooter still doesn't excuse what happened. If they did not witness a crime, the apprehension of a suspect is not their responsibility or right.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 12:50 pm
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87186 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:52 pm to
I made a wrong assumption that a call wasn’t made before/during the pursuit. That’s my fault. I thought it was just the one call.
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
24693 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:53 pm to
Does not warrant be fricking murdered you imbecile. By that standard you are implying that it is ok for people to be shot and killed as long as they have a prior incident as small as that.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85378 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:54 pm to
goddammit ell

Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
24693 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

No way to justify this. Even if he did something wrong, get on your cell phone first, and call law enforcement. Even if the man that was killed is proven to have done something illegal, these two guys need to spend a lot of time in jail.


Yep. If that’s the case then I can go around Shreveport shooting people that are rumored to have prior criminal activity.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65174 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Does not warrant be fricking murdered you imbecile. By that standard you are implying that it is ok for people to be shot and killed as long as they have a prior incident as small as that.


Yeah the priors are pretty irrelevant in this case.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87186 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:55 pm to
Sorry man. I’ll go back to trolling mask threads. Out of my element here.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85378 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

If that’s the case then I can go around Shreveport shooting people that are rumored to have prior criminal activity.



I have this shitty neighbor that I'm sure has shoplifted at some point, just sayin'
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
24693 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:58 pm to
Not to mention he’s referencing something that happened 6 years ago. Do rehabilitation and redemption not exist anymore? Is everyone forever a criminal who has ever done something like that? Stupid as hell
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 12:58 pm
Jump to page
Page First 47 48 49 50 51 ... 58
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 49 of 58Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram