Started By
Message

re: 737 Max grounding will extend into 2020 as more problems uncovered

Posted on 7/14/19 at 2:47 pm to
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

The 787 and 777 opened new markets that couldn't have otherwise been connected. Places like Pittsburgh and New Orleans couldn't have justified connections to London without the efficiency of the 787


the hub and spoke system took care of that, the 777 and 787 would be doing the long haul portion of those connections from JFK, PHL, MIA, etc., the leg from MSY or PIT would probably be flown by smaller narrow body aircraft, the new gen Boeing wide bodies are so incredibly efficient, an example of their efficiency and versatility is that if need be, they could be used on those shorter routes and still be profitable if necessary, hard to do that with the four-holer, GT, I get what your saying, the 747 is an icon, but the aircraft manufacturers are kind of hamstrung in that they have to cater to the idiotic whims and poor decisions of the lunatics that are usually in charge of running the airplanes when designing new airplanes
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
10217 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:02 pm to
They did lift the Max some. It is taller than the regular 800. Personally and I'm by no means an aircraft engineer but I wonder why the Max wasn't raised 'more'. Might be because of the width of the body so you couldn't make the landing gears longer.

(Excuse typos I just woke up from one of the best naps I have had since probably pre-K and I'm still trying to get my thoughts together lol.)
Posted by TigerStripes06
SWLA
Member since Sep 2006
30032 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

They pushed the airframe too far by increasing the length and engine size. It was never intended to be a 757 replacement, but now it has to be.



I do t really understand why they wanted to replace the 757. I liked those a lot better than the 737.
Posted by Tiger Roux
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
5027 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:10 pm to
if you ever wondered what would happen when you fire a lot of experienced engineers and replace them with the cheapest foreign "engineers" you can find.
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
10217 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

bet that Boeing Is more afraid of the potential litigation then they are of measly government fine.





Both are going to damage the company pretty bad. Now that the FAA is involved they are going to make sure all of the T are crossed and all of the...... lower case js are dotted.

Honestly the company should do a massive clean sweep from president to who ever in some form of management roll helped cover this up.

This likely wont kill off Boeing but Airbus should really jump in and start offering the NEOs for little profit (after doing their own 'deep inspection' to make sure theres mo hidden issues).

Hell southwest who only flys 737 sent a few high ranking people to go check out the NEOs however that was more of a ploy to Boeing than actually gets Neos....
Posted by TheFlyingTiger
Member since Oct 2009
4233 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

I do t really understand why they wanted to replace the 757. I liked those a lot better than the 737.


I believe most airlines wish they hadn't quit making the 757. unfortunately, most things in aviation involve timing. 9/11 and fuel prices had the bean counters panicking and thinking about RIGHT NOW and not 10 years down the road. boeing shut down the production line and that was that.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Airbus should really jump in and start offering the NEOs for little profit (after doing their own 'deep inspection' to make sure theres mo hidden issues).


been doing that every since they got into the narrow body bidness, the NEO has had plenty of problems, they've had a lot of problems with the LEAP engines, and issues with physical size of the engines mated with the old airframes, fan blades are composite, you can see a pile of carbon dust in the nacelles after engine shutdown
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
10217 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:30 pm to
I already know (not with engineers but something similar). Certain airlines have stopped using their mechanics (who are union and do make really good money) for certain maintenance issues and have decided to send the planes to central America to get it done 'cheaper'.

Since that swap of having non company mechanics do this work more planes 'break' so the company is then forced to send out the 'company' mechanic or mechanics who if I remember correctly gets time and a half from the moment they step foot on the plane that they are based out of until they step foot off of the plane that they are based out of.
Posted by Isabelle81
NEW ORLEANS, LA
Member since Sep 2015
2718 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:36 pm to
Good. They need to work out all of the bugs and not risk peoples lives.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
30307 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

They will never top the 747


The 747 was and is iconic.....I toured Shuttle Carrier N905NA in Houston yesterday. The shear versatility of that design (with some mods) was insane.
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
10217 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

been doing that every since they got into the narrow body bidness, the NEO has had plenty of problems, they've had a lot of problems with the LEAP engines, and issues with physical size of the engines mated with the old airframes, fan blades are composite, you can see a pile of carbon dust in the nacelles after engine shutdown


A buddy of mine is a pilot and also a self proclaimed 'aviation geek' and he said that the Airbus is not that great of an aircraft. I wish I had asked him more about his thoughts on Airbus but we were discussing the Silk crash with the suicide captain (not sure how we went from a 737-300 to the airbus....

What I mean by my statement is Airbus should really go all out.... come out and say we will have a 'self deep inspection' on the neos so we won't be put into the same position as our competition.... safety of the people who not only fly the aircraft but fly on our aircraft is our top priority.

Airbus then cuts the price of a % of aircraft that the airline signs the contract for...

I don't think swa would go to the Airbus but I could see American possibly jumping on that deal.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:48 pm to
American is the largest Airbus operator in the world
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
10217 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 3:57 pm to
I didn't know that they were the biggest. Learn something new everyday. I generally see their md-8 (mostly cause I can hear that thing from 20 miles away) the embraer and only a few Airbus. I still think Airbus should do something like I said.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 4:06 pm to
Ironic that the mad dog engines are considered so noisy now, they one of the first engines to comply with stage three noise refs, at one time, American operated over 400 of them, down to around 14 I think, they’ll all be parked in the desert before the end of September
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139217 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 4:08 pm to
Nothing cooler than an airplane boneyard
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 4:09 pm to
Airbus's A320 just looks awkward as hell. It's a plane that can fly but it doesn't look in the remote bit awe inspiring. It's rounded, front looks dull as hell and it looks like a big tube

I hate how the nose gear looks crooked forward. It looks like a meek and timid and doesn't scream high performance pose.



The 757 and 747 nose gear is the best looking and strikes an authoritative pose and just screams hell yeah, I'm a fricking airplane....





Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
10217 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Ironic that the mad dog engines are considered so noisy now, they one of the first engines to comply with stage three noise refs, at one time, American operated over 400 of them, down to around 14 I think, they’ll all be parked in the desert before the end of September


They just remind me of the 737-200. Maybe not exactly but there is definitely more of a 'whine' sound to them. That's the best way that I can explain it at the moment. I will be rather sad when they are retired (next year right) because everytime I see one it reminds me of how dumb my exwife was/is..... we flew out to Vegas and we had the MD from msy-dfw and dfw-las.... she picked her seat all the way through.... she was amazed that the last row was wide open and that the window seat was available. She told me that since she planned and booked the trip the she deserves the window seat all the way to and from vegas.... I smiled and said you got it babe.... she proceeded to have the best view of the engine on every leg. I have a picture of her pissed off after realizing what had happened but I don't feel like going through 7000 (yes dont judge me) pictures on my phone to get it.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 4:35 pm to
lol, I know that view very well, and won’t miss it, engine noise is similar to 737-200 because they are both derivatives of the the old P&W JT8D, the -80 engine was a little higher bypass and had more thrust, not only quieter but could get up and out of noise sensitive areas quicker
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
54364 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Just crazy they're finding all these problems just by doing the basic digging they should've done to approve its flight in the first place.


FYI - When software gets "certified" for being on commercial planes, its not uncommon to have many issues that are documented. The critical aspect is that if they impact any safety analysis or requirements for that system on the aircraft.

My guess is the FAA and Boeing execs are going through each open issue documented on the aircraft - safety related or not, to cover themselves.

And as far as the dates getting pushed back, this is again not a surprise. Getting something certified or re-certified for flight can take months to years. Obviously in this case, there will be a ton more scrutiny done in FAA reviews of the changes prior to approval.
This post was edited on 7/14/19 at 4:40 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 4:42 pm to
There's a reason why they banned the Mad Dogs from LaGuardia.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram