Started By
Message

re: 5G cellular speeds will be around 20 gigs per sec with a 1 millisec latency

Posted on 5/29/19 at 3:55 am to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 3:55 am to
quote:

quote:

And the death nail to cable



For all intensive porpoises you have used this wrong.
Posted by Rossberg02
Member since Jun 2016
2591 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:48 am to
Faster speeds at the cost of our health!


Another move by the deep state to control the masses!
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139208 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:50 am to
quote:

5G is not rebranded unless you are a scum bag ATT rep.

LAA is currently pushing the 4 and 5CC bitrate into the 1.5 Gbps speed atm.

True 5G will start in the 3.5Ghz rollout that is now occurring.

I'll agree with this even though I have no idea what it means
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
10130 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:51 am to
quote:

quote:
quote:
And the death nail to cable

For all intensive porpoises you have used this wrong.



Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43530 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:02 am to
quote:

'll agree with this even though I have no idea what it means


When I first started in telecom, a wise old man told me there will be so many acronyms that you would be speaking another language by year 3. He was right.

For your reading pleasure:

LAA (Unlicensed LTE - License Assisted Access)

CBRS

(Number)+ CC = Number of Component Carriers per TX/RX. 5CC is currently the highest in the lab and in select markets utilizing LAA/CBRS (These are small cells and not the large sites you may see on near the interstate.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 7:04 am
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141079 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:03 am to
And not a single link was given.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53590 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:06 am to
quote:

........ and a repeater in every street corner
........ and a frequency that can't penetrate the walls of buildings



Yep. I’ll be REALLLL interested to see how fast a rural rollout takes.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43530 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:07 am to
quote:

Yep. I’ll be REALLLL interested to see how fast a rural rollout takes.


You'll get LAA/CBRS combo. 600Mhz 5G.
Posted by LSU6262
Member since Jun 2008
8084 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:13 am to
quote:

5G cellular speeds will be around 20 gigs per sec


5G speeds are fast, but real world speeds are much slower.

Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43530 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:14 am to
Is that a picture from Verizon's 5G project that went to the field too quick?
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 7:15 am
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:25 am to
Real 5G speeds wont be realized for several years. The initial rollout is closee to LTE and in the UHF frequency in order to alleviate attenuation issues from millimeter waves.

True 5G will only have a max distance of around 200 meters, which means you'll need MIMO antennas everywhere. Luckily they're small and will probably attached to public lightpoles and various other preexisting infrastructure.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53590 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:50 am to
quote:

You'll get LAA/CBRS combo. 600Mhz 5G


So basically a marginal benefit over 4G speeds just so you can say you have coverage and make your map ads look pretty but nothing like urban performance in spite of being the “same” network tier.


Got it.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43530 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 7:58 am to
There are analog 5G antennas out there for longer distances.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43530 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:01 am to
quote:

So basically a marginal benefit over 4G speeds just so you can say you have coverage and make your map ads look pretty but nothing like urban performance in spite of being the “same” network tier.


I mean were getting FDD FOA bitrates of over 1.2Gbps which is faster than anything you have available today.

Google had a specific project that I cannot specify that was very ambitious and potentially something youd see in the 10-20 year range that can cover remote areas with the technology you sync. However, there are some environmental factors in play for said project.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58812 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:02 am to
Water problem has to first be solved.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10505 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Water problem has to first be solved.

Buoys with solar power or fiber ran to the buoys.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
61780 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:11 am to
Yep.
Humid climates and rain dampen the 5g signal propagation.

And the shorter wavelength is not line of sight like current cellular signals that can be overcome with taller towers.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 8:13 am
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53590 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:19 am to
quote:

There are analog 5G antennas out there for longer distances.


I thought they killed the last of the analog networks around a decade ago and went all digital?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53590 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Buoys with solar power or fiber ran to the buoys


He referring to how that frequency can get attenuated by atmospheric moisture.

Not how the range can keep an ole baw from getting game updates while fishing.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 8:22 am
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53590 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:30 am to
On a related note, just did some reading on it:

Apparently a lot of big wigs are concerned about 5G.

The 24Ghz it runs at is close enough to meteorological applications that adding all kinds of high powered transmitters on a continental scale might add all kinds of background noise on the bands satellites depend on for vapor detection.

Degrade present resolution enough to murder predictive ability.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram