Started By
Message

3 corporations now own 19,000 metro Atlanta homes

Posted on 3/11/24 at 12:59 am
Posted by Byrdybyrd05
Member since Nov 2014
25701 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 12:59 am
LINK

Corporations will only buy up more homes going forward all over the country.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
6403 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 2:12 am to
There were 99k homes for sale, as displayed on the giant realtor sign on I-85 just north of the Grady curve in 2008.

Tell your wives and their friends to stop voting for lefties. Otherwise we have no chance.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29129 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 4:21 am to
quote:

There were 99k homes for sale, as displayed on the giant realtor sign on I-85 just north of the Grady curve in 2008.


I remember that sign too, very interesting seeing that number wildly fluctuate during the Great Recession.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12151 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 5:03 am to
I can see why this is good for corporations. But this is terrible for residents.
Posted by SmelvinRat
Slumwoody
Member since Oct 2015
1387 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 5:03 am to
Didn't they have another one of those signs on I-285 between Buford Hwy and Spaghetti Junction?
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
12377 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 5:21 am to
"You will own nothing and you will like it" Klaus Schwab
Posted by Fat and Happy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
16975 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 5:34 am to
I have seen multiple articles now about developers building entire neighborhoods and only renting every house in the neighborhood.

I’m talking large neighborhoods and every single house in the whole area is only for rent.

That’s not a good sign at all
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7364 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 5:56 am to
quote:

I have seen multiple articles now about developers building entire neighborhoods and only renting every house in the neighborhood. I’m talking large neighborhoods and every single house in the whole area is only for rent. That’s not a good sign at all



Housing corporations are learning the same essential business model of grocery stores that accept Food Stamps, if the government is going to come in and pay all or a portion of some one’s bills, why not cash in on the gravy train. There is money to be made and since the government is oblivious to the costs. The housing companies control the rent rates, making them even more money, regardless if it is Joe Blow working 2 jobs to afford a 3,500 dollar a month town house, or a welfare queen paying 350 dollars a month for a bigger townhouse while her section 8 voucher pays the rest of her 4,000 dollars a month rent.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17674 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:00 am to
Look who lives there duh
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17674 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:01 am to
Just keeping the man down
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51489 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:07 am to
quote:

I have seen multiple articles now about developers building entire neighborhoods and only renting every house in the neighborhood.


It's not much different than all the apartment complexes which have gone up down Burbank from Lee to help house all of the LSU students. When\If TOPS ever shuts down, all of those will become Section 8 within a couple of years.

Renters generally take less care of the property than owners. As those neighborhoods degrade, the property owning corporations owning so much of the neighborhood will turn it Section 8 faster than it would have turned with individual property owners.

At that point it's going to take more investment by the corporations to manage and maintain those neighborhoods as an increase in poverty often accompanies an increase in crime (including property damage).
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23665 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:19 am to
quote:

Tell your wives and their friends to stop voting for lefties. Otherwise we have no chance.

Please explain what republicans have done to combat this.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29129 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:27 am to
quote:

Didn't they have another one of those signs on I-285 between Buford Hwy and Spaghetti Junction?


I think so, I spent a lot of time going past the I-85 one (just north of Brookwood). Looking it up, Metro Brokers of Atlanta (the company that put up the billboards) is still around.
Posted by tigerstripedjacket
This side of the wall
Member since Sep 2011
2999 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:28 am to
It might even be arguable that republicans have done nothing to combat this, but it’s very obvious that Democrats have done much to enable this.

The free market could never settle at this as an equilibrium. Just not possible.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18348 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:30 am to
quote:

The free market could never settle at this as an equilibrium. Just not possible.


But isn’t an unregulated free market what’s leading to this?

Corporations are able to buy up the housing and inflate prices because of unbridled capitalism.
Posted by Stexas
SWLA
Member since May 2013
5993 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:33 am to
quote:

But isn’t an unregulated free market what’s leading to this?

Nah, if subsidies and entitlements were taken away the market wouldn’t be as attractive to corporations. It’s artificially inflated prices and has kept prices increasing more rapidly than without interference.
Posted by TygerDurden
Member since Sep 2009
1847 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:25 am to
quote:

I’m talking large neighborhoods and every single house in the whole area is only for rent.


Every house an entire community being a rental is a recipe for slow degradation for that community. Most (not all) but certainly most renters see that home as being temporary therefore they aren’t invested in keeping it nice, updated, organized, repaired or frankly any other adjective you can think of. As example one of the first signs that neighborhood is on its way down is the increase in the number of rental homes. It’s a slow drop to the bottom and can take years to occur. Beyond these corporations buying rentals Also complicit are landlords that should not be landlords as well. They watched a how to video on buying rentals and off they go. They spend too much and then come to reality that they have to cut corners to make it work. Again not every rental is bad but when large portions or the entire neighborhood are rental properties it won’t end well.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
10903 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:29 am to
quote:

Please explain what republicans have done to combat this.


It’s one of the great ironies of MAGA. Expecting Trump, a draft and tax dodging, grifting, crooked real estate developer to save everyone from this kind of stuff.

The man is a walking pyramid scheme.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
1606 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:29 am to
"Nah, if subsidies and entitlements were taken away the market wouldn’t be as attractive to corporations. It’s artificially inflated prices and has kept prices increasing more rapidly than without interference."
_________________________________
Which subsidies and entitlements do you think are causing this?
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30237 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Please explain what republicans have done to combat this.


This is how I feel too. I’ve become so disgusted with politics because T Boy is correct here. We blame so much on Democrats and they deserve much of it, but the GOP doesn’t do a damn thing in the other direction.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram