Started By
Message

re: 155 years ago today....Robert E. Lee surrendered to Ulysses S. Grant

Posted on 4/9/20 at 4:21 pm to
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42595 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 4:21 pm to
quote:


I've never understood this assumption.


People see the southern victory, but they don’t see a tattered and bartered Rebel Army, victorious but disorganized, or the Union forts around DC and just assume the Rebs could waltz right into DC.

Bull Run was a great win for the South but they really didn’t gain much of a tactical advantage. It was s a huge morale booster, however.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42595 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 4:23 pm to
quote:


If Lee had embraced Guerrilla warfare, the south would've drug out the war for years, possibly a decade or two more before the North gets impatient and negotiates peace terms and ends the war.

But Lee was too honorable and classy for guerrilla warfare so that's that.


Meanwhile life in the South would have been way worse than it was during reconstruction.
Way worse.
Posted by Rep520
Member since Mar 2018
10476 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

the South had marched into the north after the 1st Bull Run it would have been over with a quickness...

I've never understood this assumption.


I think it rests on the assumption that the end was a truce if Washington, DC fell.

Lee didn't have the resources for a prolonged invasion and the North had major population centers in Philly, New York, etc. The end goal for the South could never have been surrender, but just a truce.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
10917 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Spending the next 100 years with segregation didn’t help the south’s argument either.


yeah let's act like that was exclusive to the South.

MLB didn't integrate until 1947.
St. Louis was the only southern city with a team in the league back then.
Unless you want to also count DC as a southern city.

Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

think it rests on the assumption that the end was a truce if Washington, DC fell.


So what if DC falls?

The Union government would still function. There'd be no impact on northern industry.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37482 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 5:24 pm to
That was never going to happen and would have been terrible for the South. Lee got outmanuevered by Grant and found himself surrounded.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42595 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 6:49 pm to
quote:


So what if DC falls?

The Union government would still function. There'd be no impact on northern industry.

Huge morale boost for South, Lincoln in political trouble, lukewarm Northeners about the war gain traction and a political settlement is reached.
But it was never close to falling.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

But it was never close to falling.


I’m fairly certain that it was never the CSA’s aim to actually take DC.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39817 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Lee was probably the greatest General in History



No, probably not.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42595 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 7:39 pm to
quote:


I’m fairly certain that it was never the CSA’s aim to actually take DC.


Right, but they almost attacked very late in the war when Jubal Early’s Corp came close to the city which was barely defended at that time. They had the numbers to do some serious damage, but their troops were exhausted.
Posted by Mr. Misanthrope
Cloud 8
Member since Nov 2012
6427 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

The guy is amazing, I liked how he basically snuck away from the University to join the Maine Brigade.

Agreed. The term hero takes in more territory these days than probably it should. That can't be said of him.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71121 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Right, but they almost attacked very late in the war when Jubal Early’s Corp came close to the city which was barely defended at that time.


There were 30,000 Union soldiers within the most impregnable fortress city in the world at that point in time pitted against 10,000 Confederates. The outcome was never in doubt. Early made a try for the city at Fort Stevens, got cock blocked fairly easily, and then got his arse kicked by Sheridan at Cedar Creek.



This post was edited on 4/9/20 at 9:36 pm
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29594 posts
Posted on 4/9/20 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

There was an abolitionist movement at the time and a war fought over it,


The North sure as hell wasn't fighting to free slaves.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram