- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would you support Tillman Fertitta buying the Saints?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:34 am
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:34 am
(no message)
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:47 am to PSS101
Not at the moment. I would support Todd!
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:00 am to PSS101
Only if a ironclad agreement to not move is included in any sale.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:21 am to PSS101
I prefer a native to Louisiana which would be Todd Graves
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:22 am to PSS101
i wouldn't have a choice but i'm content with Gayle owning it for now. i am a bit concerned more about what the succession plan is.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:41 am to PSS101
Gayle is doing well with the Saints in my opinion.
That said, she is not getting any younger.
I’d rather a Louisiana native buy the Saints. So I’d support Todd.
That said, she is not getting any younger.
I’d rather a Louisiana native buy the Saints. So I’d support Todd.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:43 am to goatmilker
With the purchase of Ceasers, Fertitta will own ceasars new orleans casino and the dome naming rights. Where would he move the saints that would align better with his hospitality and casino businesses?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:49 am to fwtex
Tons of conflicts of interest that are against nfl policy:
Yes, owning Caesars Entertainment—which Tilman Fertitta's Fertitta Entertainment officially agreed to acquire for roughly $17.6 billion—presents a major conflict of interest under NFL rules.The NFL enforces very strict anti-gambling and sports betting regulations for its majority owners to protect the integrity of the game. If Fertitta pursues buying the New Orleans Saints, his casino operations create three primary conflicts:1. Sportsbooks and Sports BettingThe Conflict: Caesars operates one of the largest sports betting platforms and retail sportsbooks in North America.The NFL Rule: NFL owners are strictly prohibited from operating sportsbooks that take bets on NFL games. Because Caesars takes billions in NFL wagers, Fertitta cannot hold a majority stake in both an NFL team and Caesars Sportsbook simultaneously.2. The Naming Rights ProblemThe Conflict: In 2021, Caesars purchased the 20-year naming rights to the Saints' home stadium, the Caesars Superdome.The NFL Rule: An NFL owner cannot own a company that has a massive commercial sponsorship and naming rights deal with their own stadium. This would essentially mean Fertitta would be paying sponsorship revenue to himself, creating severe financial and cross-promotional conflicts of interest.3. Local Casino PresenceThe Conflict: Caesars is the dominant casino operator in the state of Louisiana, notably running Harrah's New Orleans (which is being rebranded into Caesars New Orleans) right in the Saints' backyard.The NFL Rule: While the NFL now allows team owners to have passive or heavily capped investments in hospitality and casino companies, owning the absolute largest local gambling hub in the team's home market invites heavy regulatory scrutiny regarding local influence and market monopolies.What Fertitta Would Have to DoTo clear NFL vetting, Fertitta would likely have to structure a deal to completely spin off, divest, or sell the sports betting arm of Caesars, or hold a completely passive, non-voting equity share with zero operational control. He already has experience with this restriction: he had to sell his minority share of the Houston Texans in 2008 because his Golden Nugget casinos offered sports betting at the time.Would you like to explore how other pro sports leagues (like the NBA, where Fertitta owns the Houston Rockets) handle his sports betting ties, or look closer at the NFL's specific vetting process for new owners? Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
Yes, owning Caesars Entertainment—which Tilman Fertitta's Fertitta Entertainment officially agreed to acquire for roughly $17.6 billion—presents a major conflict of interest under NFL rules.The NFL enforces very strict anti-gambling and sports betting regulations for its majority owners to protect the integrity of the game. If Fertitta pursues buying the New Orleans Saints, his casino operations create three primary conflicts:1. Sportsbooks and Sports BettingThe Conflict: Caesars operates one of the largest sports betting platforms and retail sportsbooks in North America.The NFL Rule: NFL owners are strictly prohibited from operating sportsbooks that take bets on NFL games. Because Caesars takes billions in NFL wagers, Fertitta cannot hold a majority stake in both an NFL team and Caesars Sportsbook simultaneously.2. The Naming Rights ProblemThe Conflict: In 2021, Caesars purchased the 20-year naming rights to the Saints' home stadium, the Caesars Superdome.The NFL Rule: An NFL owner cannot own a company that has a massive commercial sponsorship and naming rights deal with their own stadium. This would essentially mean Fertitta would be paying sponsorship revenue to himself, creating severe financial and cross-promotional conflicts of interest.3. Local Casino PresenceThe Conflict: Caesars is the dominant casino operator in the state of Louisiana, notably running Harrah's New Orleans (which is being rebranded into Caesars New Orleans) right in the Saints' backyard.The NFL Rule: While the NFL now allows team owners to have passive or heavily capped investments in hospitality and casino companies, owning the absolute largest local gambling hub in the team's home market invites heavy regulatory scrutiny regarding local influence and market monopolies.What Fertitta Would Have to DoTo clear NFL vetting, Fertitta would likely have to structure a deal to completely spin off, divest, or sell the sports betting arm of Caesars, or hold a completely passive, non-voting equity share with zero operational control. He already has experience with this restriction: he had to sell his minority share of the Houston Texans in 2008 because his Golden Nugget casinos offered sports betting at the time.Would you like to explore how other pro sports leagues (like the NBA, where Fertitta owns the Houston Rockets) handle his sports betting ties, or look closer at the NFL's specific vetting process for new owners? Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:51 am to goatmilker
quote:
Only if a ironclad agreement to not move is included in any sale.
Would have to be something dictated by the league, and even then could be subject to change once circumstances changed.
Any “ironclad agreement” between Benson & new owner would be unenforceable once the new owner has full control
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:48 pm to Weekend Warrior79
If they build the $3.7 billion dollar new dome & surrounding areas for the Saints, the Saints better not be moving in the next millenium.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 1:04 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
If they build the $3.7 billion dollar new dome & surrounding areas for the Saints, the Saints better not be moving in the next millenium
Where are they going to build a new stadium? Metairie? The Northshore? Gulf Coast Mississippi?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 2:26 pm to TIGERSby10
My uneducated guess my friend is that 500 million wasn't spent to build a new stadium anytime soon.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:11 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
If they build the $3.7 billion dollar new dome & surrounding areas for the Saints, the Saints better not be moving in the next millenium.
A new Dome/Stadium for the Saints is 3rd on the list behind the New Mississippi river bridge and the Baton Rouge Loop.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:30 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
The Naming Rights ProblemThe Conflict: In 2021, Caesars purchased the 20-year naming rights to the Saints' home stadium, the Caesars Superdome.The NFL Rule: An NFL owner cannot own a company that has a massive commercial sponsorship and naming rights deal with their own stadium. This would essentially mean Fertitta would be paying sponsorship revenue to himself, creating severe financial and cross-promotional conflicts of interest
Didn't Tom Benson own multiple MB dealerships when they had the naming rights of the Dome?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:33 pm to GCTigahs
His dealership was not the naming rights
Though
Though
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:16 pm to PSS101
Todd Graves is the perfect owner imo. Younger, lifelong fan, Louisiana native, and who has only strengthened his ties to the state since he struck it rich.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:00 am to TIGERSby10
I doubt he would move the team to Houston since they already have the Texans
No future owner would move team knowing how the NFL still considers New Orleans as a quality Super Bowl host site
No future owner would move team knowing how the NFL still considers New Orleans as a quality Super Bowl host site
Posted on 7/7/26 at 9:26 am to Weekend Warrior79
Any such agreement would have to be secured by an automatic, judicially enforceable financial penalty in the event of a relocation…
Posted on 7/7/26 at 9:41 am to nicholastiger
Money rules the nfl. It is easy to see the possibilities. A large city and richer State can offer more money and more TV revenue. A free brand new stadium. A owner worth billions of dollars to throw around where its needed and a promised future revenue stream unmatched in nfl history.
The wealth of individuals in this country makes anything possible.
The wealth of individuals in this country makes anything possible.
Popular
Back to top

10









