Started By
Message

Would you support Tillman Fertitta buying the Saints?

Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:34 am
Posted by PSS101
Member since Jun 2024
1856 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:34 am
(no message)
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63496 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:36 am to
of course
Posted by mmonro3
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2013
4267 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:47 am to
Not at the moment. I would support Todd!
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76812 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:00 am to
Only if a ironclad agreement to not move is included in any sale.
Posted by FlyingTigerBo
Member since Dec 2025
47 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:21 am to
I prefer a native to Louisiana which would be Todd Graves
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179610 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:22 am to
i wouldn't have a choice but i'm content with Gayle owning it for now. i am a bit concerned more about what the succession plan is.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72184 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:41 am to
Gayle is doing well with the Saints in my opinion.

That said, she is not getting any younger.

I’d rather a Louisiana native buy the Saints. So I’d support Todd.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
3439 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:43 am to
With the purchase of Ceasers, Fertitta will own ceasars new orleans casino and the dome naming rights. Where would he move the saints that would align better with his hospitality and casino businesses?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179610 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:49 am to
Tons of conflicts of interest that are against nfl policy:

Yes, owning Caesars Entertainment—which Tilman Fertitta's Fertitta Entertainment officially agreed to acquire for roughly $17.6 billion—presents a major conflict of interest under NFL rules.The NFL enforces very strict anti-gambling and sports betting regulations for its majority owners to protect the integrity of the game. If Fertitta pursues buying the New Orleans Saints, his casino operations create three primary conflicts:1. Sportsbooks and Sports BettingThe Conflict: Caesars operates one of the largest sports betting platforms and retail sportsbooks in North America.The NFL Rule: NFL owners are strictly prohibited from operating sportsbooks that take bets on NFL games. Because Caesars takes billions in NFL wagers, Fertitta cannot hold a majority stake in both an NFL team and Caesars Sportsbook simultaneously.2. The Naming Rights ProblemThe Conflict: In 2021, Caesars purchased the 20-year naming rights to the Saints' home stadium, the Caesars Superdome.The NFL Rule: An NFL owner cannot own a company that has a massive commercial sponsorship and naming rights deal with their own stadium. This would essentially mean Fertitta would be paying sponsorship revenue to himself, creating severe financial and cross-promotional conflicts of interest.3. Local Casino PresenceThe Conflict: Caesars is the dominant casino operator in the state of Louisiana, notably running Harrah's New Orleans (which is being rebranded into Caesars New Orleans) right in the Saints' backyard.The NFL Rule: While the NFL now allows team owners to have passive or heavily capped investments in hospitality and casino companies, owning the absolute largest local gambling hub in the team's home market invites heavy regulatory scrutiny regarding local influence and market monopolies.What Fertitta Would Have to DoTo clear NFL vetting, Fertitta would likely have to structure a deal to completely spin off, divest, or sell the sports betting arm of Caesars, or hold a completely passive, non-voting equity share with zero operational control. He already has experience with this restriction: he had to sell his minority share of the Houston Texans in 2008 because his Golden Nugget casinos offered sports betting at the time.Would you like to explore how other pro sports leagues (like the NBA, where Fertitta owns the Houston Rockets) handle his sports betting ties, or look closer at the NFL's specific vetting process for new owners? Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22063 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Only if a ironclad agreement to not move is included in any sale.

Would have to be something dictated by the league, and even then could be subject to change once circumstances changed.

Any “ironclad agreement” between Benson & new owner would be unenforceable once the new owner has full control
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
8035 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:48 pm to
If they build the $3.7 billion dollar new dome & surrounding areas for the Saints, the Saints better not be moving in the next millenium.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
10754 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

If they build the $3.7 billion dollar new dome & surrounding areas for the Saints, the Saints better not be moving in the next millenium


Where are they going to build a new stadium? Metairie? The Northshore? Gulf Coast Mississippi?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76812 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 2:26 pm to
My uneducated guess my friend is that 500 million wasn't spent to build a new stadium anytime soon.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17079 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

If they build the $3.7 billion dollar new dome & surrounding areas for the Saints, the Saints better not be moving in the next millenium.


A new Dome/Stadium for the Saints is 3rd on the list behind the New Mississippi river bridge and the Baton Rouge Loop.

Posted by GCTigahs
Member since Oct 2014
2581 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

The Naming Rights ProblemThe Conflict: In 2021, Caesars purchased the 20-year naming rights to the Saints' home stadium, the Caesars Superdome.The NFL Rule: An NFL owner cannot own a company that has a massive commercial sponsorship and naming rights deal with their own stadium. This would essentially mean Fertitta would be paying sponsorship revenue to himself, creating severe financial and cross-promotional conflicts of interest


Didn't Tom Benson own multiple MB dealerships when they had the naming rights of the Dome?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179610 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:33 pm to
His dealership was not the naming rights
Though
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Marathon, FL
Member since Oct 2005
14685 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 10:16 pm to
Todd Graves is the perfect owner imo. Younger, lifelong fan, Louisiana native, and who has only strengthened his ties to the state since he struck it rich.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
56805 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:00 am to
I doubt he would move the team to Houston since they already have the Texans

No future owner would move team knowing how the NFL still considers New Orleans as a quality Super Bowl host site
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69294 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 9:26 am to
Any such agreement would have to be secured by an automatic, judicially enforceable financial penalty in the event of a relocation…
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76812 posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 9:41 am to
Money rules the nfl. It is easy to see the possibilities. A large city and richer State can offer more money and more TV revenue. A free brand new stadium. A owner worth billions of dollars to throw around where its needed and a promised future revenue stream unmatched in nfl history.
The wealth of individuals in this country makes anything possible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram