- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/24/23 at 3:44 pm to BilJ
I just don’t see the 9ers moving him. Purdy has looked good but he is Mr. Irrelevant and Lance was traded up at the top of the draft for. As mediocre/bad as he has looked in limited play time I don’t think we’ve seen enough other than the fact that he can’t seem to stay healthy
Posted on 1/24/23 at 3:47 pm to BilJ
If he is deemed 'not crazy' then sure.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 3:56 pm to BilJ
Of course i would give up a 3rd for trey lance.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 3:57 pm to Shameless
quote:
I just don’t see the 9ers moving him. Purdy has looked good but he is Mr. Irrelevant and Lance was traded up at the top of the draft for. As mediocre/bad as he has looked in limited play time I don’t think we’ve seen enough other than the fact that he can’t seem to stay healthy
Yeah, i don't see them mobing him this yr either.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 4:11 pm to BilJ
Low 3rd, sure.
High 3rd, no. You can get some damn elite talent with that
High 3rd, no. You can get some damn elite talent with that
Posted on 1/24/23 at 4:13 pm to Diesel88
quote:
Doubts about future resilience due to injuries from a fanbase that won its first super bowl thanks to Drew Brees is so rich.
No I have doubts if the guy can even play qb successfully in the nfl
We have no idea.
If the 9ers are REALLY willing to trade him for a 3rd rounder after giving up 3 first rounders for him 2 years ago that’s probably a HUGE red flag.
This post was edited on 1/24/23 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 1/24/23 at 4:23 pm to St Augustine
If I knew we were going to pick a quarterback with that third rounder then yes I would rather have Trey Lance.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 4:31 pm to BilJ
It beats the hell out of trading a second for Derek Carr.
But I think the niners would be stupid to not at least have Lance and Purdy battle it out in camp next year. Regardless of how far they go in the playoffs.
But I think the niners would be stupid to not at least have Lance and Purdy battle it out in camp next year. Regardless of how far they go in the playoffs.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 4:47 pm to BilJ
Pedigree? Lol. He was a 3 star that went to North Dakota…
Posted on 1/24/23 at 5:05 pm to BilJ
For a 3rd rounder, I would take that chance.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 5:10 pm to St Augustine
Yeah, I don’t see any way they move on from him this year. We’ve seen guys like Purdy go on a nice run early only to fizzle out. They’ve just invested too many resources to give up on him so early. They’re gonna need a backup regardless.
And like St. Aug said, if Shannahan is ready to give up on him after year 2 and doesn’t think he can do anything with him, that’s a HUGE red flag.
Only way I see it is if Philly exposes Purdy a bit Sunday, they get housed by the Eagles, and wind up signing Brady for a year or 2 to let Purdy get a little more seasoning. Probably not keeping 3 QBs. Even then, I’d let them battle it out this off-season for the 2 job.
And like St. Aug said, if Shannahan is ready to give up on him after year 2 and doesn’t think he can do anything with him, that’s a HUGE red flag.
Only way I see it is if Philly exposes Purdy a bit Sunday, they get housed by the Eagles, and wind up signing Brady for a year or 2 to let Purdy get a little more seasoning. Probably not keeping 3 QBs. Even then, I’d let them battle it out this off-season for the 2 job.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 5:35 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
Only way I see it is if Philly exposes Purdy a bit Sunday, they get housed by the Eagles, and wind up signing Brady for a year or 2 to let Purdy get a little more seasoning. Probably not keeping 3 QBs. Even then, I’d let them battle it out this off-season for the 2 job.
Wasn’t Purdy like a 4 year starter? He’s got them to the NFC championship game after winning a bunch of games down the stretch. He’s on the lowest of the low rookie scale contracts. He doesn’t need seasoning. He needs first team reps in the off-season and preseason to show he can be the man. His time is now.
I’m sure they want to keep Lance as insurance and maybe rehab his value some to get more in a trade. He’s also on his rookie deal, so they can be picky.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 6:17 pm to Hot Carl
It might not be shanny giving up, but with Lance already being raw coming out and now going into season 3 with only a handful of starts under his belt, his development may no longer fit their window
This post was edited on 1/24/23 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 1/24/23 at 6:46 pm to BilJ
Good thought. The saints Gm’s on here won’t like it though
Posted on 1/24/23 at 6:59 pm to Jaydeaux
The other thing to consider is that with the unknown in this case (only 2 years), they may get more value now (3rd rounder) than next year 6th or 7th if at all.
It is the sunk cost fallacy for many in this discussion, and being able to get around that is what makes most successful business people. It's not being perfect at making decisions, it is knowing when to cut bait and try something else. They don't dig themselves deeper based on previous mistakes. They just move on and get what they can.
This is the issue for the Saints, ironically. They fell into the sunk cost fallacy multiple times with Payton and Loomis and it has bit them in the arse and hamstrung the team at times.
For a 3rd or 4th, you definitely take Lance.
It is the sunk cost fallacy for many in this discussion, and being able to get around that is what makes most successful business people. It's not being perfect at making decisions, it is knowing when to cut bait and try something else. They don't dig themselves deeper based on previous mistakes. They just move on and get what they can.
This is the issue for the Saints, ironically. They fell into the sunk cost fallacy multiple times with Payton and Loomis and it has bit them in the arse and hamstrung the team at times.
For a 3rd or 4th, you definitely take Lance.
Posted on 1/24/23 at 8:24 pm to BilJ
No he is totally unproven
Posted on 1/24/23 at 8:45 pm to BilJ
frick yes
Posted on 1/24/23 at 8:48 pm to moock blackjack
quote:
No he is totally unproven
As opposed to all 3 rounds picks that are completely proven?
I’m pretty shocked at the amount of people that oppose giving up a fricking 3rd rounder for the guy
This post was edited on 1/24/23 at 8:50 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News