- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Saints should be working a deal for Jarvis Landry right now
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:10 am
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:10 am
Rumor is he is available as the Dolphins blow up their roster. Landry would be a phenomenal compliment to Michael Thomas and an improvement over Snead, whom Payton seems to really be taking his time with bringing back.
Landry is a free agent next year, and receiver will be a top target for the Saints for 2018. Go get a proven commodity now for the playoff push.
Landry is a free agent next year, and receiver will be a top target for the Saints for 2018. Go get a proven commodity now for the playoff push.
19
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:12 am to LSUZombie
I wish.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:12 am to LSUZombie
Only if we can give him the pick we received from Arizona. That’s it and only it.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:14 am to LSUZombie
quote:
The ____________ should be working a deal for Jarvis Landry right now
Per twitter, list of teams:
Bears
Steelers
Patriots
Cowboys
Saints
Titans
Browns
Jags
Niners
Giants
Eagles
Rams
Redskins
Colts
Vikings
Cardinals
Just to name a few
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 9:15 am
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:15 am to LSUZombie
Not fan of giving up resources for a 9 game rental we'll still need to compete for in FA.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:15 am to LSUZombie
I know it's tempting, but we can't be giving away high picks for these trades. 5th or below would be ideal, but I agree, it'd be nice to have him.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:16 am to LSUZombie
The price for him will be astronomical, and then you have to sign him to a large deal in FA.
Trust me, I would love to have him. It would catapult us into the stratosphere this year.
Just don't think we can swing it.
Trust me, I would love to have him. It would catapult us into the stratosphere this year.
Just don't think we can swing it.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:17 am to Brettesaurus Rex
I truly believe that the 9 game rental will give us a leg up on him in FA. He'll get to see that Sean Payton can draw stuff up for him and the Drew can get him the ball.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:17 am to LSUZombie
Why give up a potential king's ransom for what would amount to an eight game rental? The Saints are doing just fine in the passing game (1 yard out of 3rd place in yards per game). And, Landry is redundant. Thomas serves that role very well for the Saints.
If it were another pass rusher to stick opposite of Jordan, or a lock-down corner to put opposite of Lattimore, or hell, even a MLB to add depth/toughness against the run, then fine. No need to give away draft picks for a WR. Particularly now when it looks like the Saints are starting to draft well again.
If it were another pass rusher to stick opposite of Jordan, or a lock-down corner to put opposite of Lattimore, or hell, even a MLB to add depth/toughness against the run, then fine. No need to give away draft picks for a WR. Particularly now when it looks like the Saints are starting to draft well again.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:18 am to Alt26
They just traded Jay Ajai for a 4th. They won't be asking for a kings ransom. We could probably get away with a 3rd or a 5th and 6th/Snead combo.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:20 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
The price for him will be astronomical
quote:
, and then you have to sign him to a large deal in FA.
Both of those things cant be true lol
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:20 am to Bert Macklin FBI
would probably need to assume a 11-13 mill a year contract would be what it takes to sign Landry long term.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:22 am to Chad504boy
didn't they give jimmy something in that neighborhood?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:24 am to Brettesaurus Rex
Teams don't make these trades without agreeing to long term deals ahead of time.
That said they aren't going to give him away for nothing. Cooks went for a 1st. Landry will fetch a 2nd and perhaps another pick.
We don't have a second.
That said they aren't going to give him away for nothing. Cooks went for a 1st. Landry will fetch a 2nd and perhaps another pick.
We don't have a second.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:24 am to LSUZombie
quote:
Landry would be a phenomenal compliment to Michael Thomas
Listen. I really like Landry. But is this true? Landry is a short yardage possession receiver (because he is slow). Thomas is kind of that for us. I feel like a really good compliment to Thomas is a field-stretching player.
That said, I'd take Landry, but probably not for what they are asking.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:25 am to bonethug0108
quote:
. Cooks went for a 1st.
Cooks had 2 full years of contract before having to be paid huge money and he's a speedster which adds tremendous value. Landry isn't going for a 2nd pick at all bone when he's got 9 games remaining before immediately having to get paid huge money.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:26 am to Hester Carries
He's talking about the "price" of the picks, and then needing sign him to a big deal.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:27 am to bonethug0108
quote:
Landry will fetch a 2nd and perhaps another pick.
They just gave Ajayi away for a 4th. I wouldn't think the Dolphins would have that high of an asking price for the 2nd best WR on their team, especially a slot WR. I think the Saints could get him for cheap, but with him being an UFA after this year, would the Saints want to lock him up long term for around $10-11 mil/year?
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 9:28 am
Posted on 10/31/17 at 9:28 am to Alt26
quote:
Why give up a potential king's ransom for what would amount to an eight game rental?
Depends on how far they think they can go this year.
quote:
The Saints are doing just fine in the passing game (1 yard out of 3rd place in yards per game).
I have no idea off the top of my head, but how much of that is bolstered by the screen game? As the season goes on and you get into the postseason, they need to be able to get chunks of yards downfield to keep the screen open.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News