- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints/Loomis/Payton accused of drug cover up-Shite just got real
Posted on 5/3/10 at 1:34 pm to teke184
Posted on 5/3/10 at 1:34 pm to teke184
quote:Do we know for sure that Payton didn't have a prescription? I haven't seen that anywhere.
The Payton stuff is more questionable, as omitting him from the DEA report could be considered perjury and may open an investigation into why he had so many pills without a prescription or a condition necessitating their use.
2
Posted on 5/3/10 at 1:40 pm to GOP_Tiger
I'd have trouble digging up an article supporting that because we only have what has been leaked so far, NOT the actual complaint or any evidence.
The allegations, as I recall from early articles, were that "Employee A", Payton, was in the drug log as having a large number of pills but no scrip for them or a condition necessitating their use.
"Employee B", Vitt, was in the log for having a large number of pills as well but had a scrip for them because of a chronic pain condition.
The allegations, as I recall from early articles, were that "Employee A", Payton, was in the drug log as having a large number of pills but no scrip for them or a condition necessitating their use.
"Employee B", Vitt, was in the log for having a large number of pills as well but had a scrip for them because of a chronic pain condition.
Posted on 5/3/10 at 2:03 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Do we know for sure that Payton didn't have a prescription? I haven't seen that anywhere.
The evidence doesn't suggest he did.
Posted on 5/3/10 at 2:17 pm to chRxis
quote:
so before you go off with your little "i work in a pharmacy" rant, always know there is someone lurking around here with more knowledge than you on some issue you decide to insert your foot into your mouth about...
tigerbait3488 hasn't shown back up since we put him in his place Saturday. I'm sure he is just a clerk acting like he's important.
Posted on 5/3/10 at 2:58 pm to s-man
can someone update what is going on, dont feel like reading this shite
Posted on 5/3/10 at 3:16 pm to Lester Earl
quote:Hearsay and accusations atm
can someone update what is going on, dont feel like reading this shite
Posted on 5/3/10 at 3:20 pm to mx579
cool, hopefully they fire loomis
Posted on 5/3/10 at 3:24 pm to eyeran
Hey guys, I wonder if we're focusing on the wrong thing.
Payton's involvement, Vitt's theft - all problems or potential problems, no doubt, to whatever degree of severity.
If any law schoolers want to help me out here - isn't the really big problem, the reason this really stinks so bad, the cover-up? I'm pretty sure THAT's what stinks so bad.
Just a kinda sorta similar example - martha stewart wasn't screwed b/c of the insider trading, it's because she lied about it. Or Barry Bonds (please don't think I'm comparing this issue in more than just one way to these cases) it wasn't the drug use, so much as the LIE to COVER UP the story, right?
So again, I am only comparing these cases in ONE way - the fact that the COVER-UP is what caused the most legal trouble, makes sense? ignore drugs, ignore inside info, ignore everything else, but focus on the COVER UP - that's the biggest LEGAL problem right?
Law schoolers, jump in, I'm pretty sure this is really the biggest legal problem here. What do you guys think? Everything else could be big problems themselves, but the cover-up, in my opinion, is the biggest legal issue BY FAR!
By the way, if you read the complaint filed by the former security guy, the thing really is the cover up, that he was asked to lie about the issue, which is a felony, and that's why he resigned, his whole complaint revolves around being asked to commit a felony, which it technically (unavoidably) is. Thoughts?
Payton's involvement, Vitt's theft - all problems or potential problems, no doubt, to whatever degree of severity.
If any law schoolers want to help me out here - isn't the really big problem, the reason this really stinks so bad, the cover-up? I'm pretty sure THAT's what stinks so bad.
Just a kinda sorta similar example - martha stewart wasn't screwed b/c of the insider trading, it's because she lied about it. Or Barry Bonds (please don't think I'm comparing this issue in more than just one way to these cases) it wasn't the drug use, so much as the LIE to COVER UP the story, right?
So again, I am only comparing these cases in ONE way - the fact that the COVER-UP is what caused the most legal trouble, makes sense? ignore drugs, ignore inside info, ignore everything else, but focus on the COVER UP - that's the biggest LEGAL problem right?
Law schoolers, jump in, I'm pretty sure this is really the biggest legal problem here. What do you guys think? Everything else could be big problems themselves, but the cover-up, in my opinion, is the biggest legal issue BY FAR!
By the way, if you read the complaint filed by the former security guy, the thing really is the cover up, that he was asked to lie about the issue, which is a felony, and that's why he resigned, his whole complaint revolves around being asked to commit a felony, which it technically (unavoidably) is. Thoughts?
This post was edited on 5/3/10 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 5/3/10 at 3:28 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
can someone update what is going on, dont feel like reading this shite
Vitt and Payton are pills poppers. Vitt stole his, Payton received his w/o a script, and Loomis tried to cover it up. Hopefully this all will get settled civily.
Posted on 5/3/10 at 3:40 pm to Mouth
The Saints wone the superbowl. 
Posted on 5/3/10 at 3:50 pm to jbush4
quote:Yeah Vitt and especially Loomis are the only ones that could potentially be in real trouble. Vitt got caught stealing 3 times and Loomis might have have tried to cover it up
jbush4
Although when you actually read it, it says Loomis went to the guy about possibly covering it up and he told Loomis he'd be crazy to do that because its a felony. Loomis decided against it and reported what happened to the authorites, who have supposedly known about this for about a year.
This post was edited on 5/3/10 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:01 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
cool, hopefully they fire loomis
you cant be serious
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:15 pm to TEXASTIGER22
i am, sorry
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:20 pm to Mouth
quote:
Vitt and Payton are pills poppers. Vitt stole his, Payton received his w/o a script, and Loomis tried to cover it up. Hopefully this all will get settled civily.
allegedly
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:34 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
i am, sorry
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:44 pm to chRxis
quote:
kind of tarnishes the trophy a bit for me...
Then call up the Saints and tell them to give the motherfricker back.
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:57 pm to TEXASTIGER22
quote:
hopefully they fire loomis
you cant be serious
fire all involved. and I am serious
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:58 pm to Midget Death Squad
awesome. I say we move the team to San Antonio. That seems logical.
Posted on 5/3/10 at 4:58 pm to Midget Death Squad
all except payton
Posted on 5/3/10 at 5:01 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
all except payton
you're going to find out soon that Payton was involved.
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News