- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official: Payton + 3rd traded to broncos for first round in 2023 and 2nd next year.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:11 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:11 pm to goatmilker
quote:
If you take note of what Rap reports he says CSP was basically 3rd choice for Denver after Ryans and Harbaugh. If correct your not getting a great prom date/deal on your 3rd choice lol
You are a fool if you believe that. They gave up multiple picks and will pay highly for payton. They could have offered more money toward the other coaches and gave up no picks to land them if they wanted.
Truth of the matter is the saints got fleeced, which has been the case for almost every trade they have made for quite a while.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:31 pm to tigersquad89
Loomis got hosed again!
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:32 pm to moock blackjack
quote:
Loomis got hosed again!
Keep posting this same thing over and over. Maybe eventually we’ll get that second 1st rd pick you morons kept saying we should get
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:36 pm to tigersquad89
Late to the party here
Saints got fricking hosed and Loomis is fricking trash
I’m done with this front office
Saints got fricking hosed and Loomis is fricking trash
I’m done with this front office
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:40 pm to DJ3K
quote:
anyone who thought the saints would get more than 1 1st
They did get more than one first. So why are you laughing? Or do you simply not understand the parameters of the deal.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:43 pm to LSUgrad88
Denver’s first is worthless with our needs
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:46 pm to cas4t
That’s so phenomenally stupid. So we can’t use the 29th pick in the draft. Frightening how dumb some people are.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:50 pm to DJ3K
The 3rd does sting, but I wish, and I don’t know if it was possible, to put an exception in the deal.
If broncos make playoffs saints get the 3 back, or the second becomes a first.
I don’t believe this was awful since we knew it could have been nothing down the road.
It’s not a great draft so waiting to see how many players get cut.
If broncos make playoffs saints get the 3 back, or the second becomes a first.
I don’t believe this was awful since we knew it could have been nothing down the road.
It’s not a great draft so waiting to see how many players get cut.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:52 pm to LSUgrad88
Of course we can use it
Just can’t get a position of dire need imo
Who do you think the saints should take at 29 then?
Mocks are available. Feel free to google before you answer.
Just can’t get a position of dire need imo
quote:
That’s so phenomenally stupid.
Who do you think the saints should take at 29 then?
Mocks are available. Feel free to google before you answer.
This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:57 pm to beauchristopher
quote:
I feel like they could have settled for and 1st and a 2nd without giving up a 3rd.
Maybe that wasn't an option. Maybe this was the best anyone would offer.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 6:58 pm to cas4t
quote:
Denver’s first is worthless with our needs
Damn right
Don't need their help

Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:00 pm to tigersquad89
Great. Now I have to stay up late on a Thursday night before work.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:03 pm to cas4t
quote:
Saints got fricking hosed and Loomis is fricking trash
I’m done with this front office
pretty much this...
Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:05 pm to cas4t
I’m not debating how valuable the pick is, I’m debating the accuracy of saying a team with a crap load of needs can’t address at least one of them with the 29th pick in the draft. Anyway you addressed your prior statement by saying “of course we can use it.” And you’re right, this time.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:10 pm to diat150
Talk to Rap.
I know this. Any poster saying we got fleeced is either a troll, a idiot or a post generator.
We got a low 1st and a 3rd for a coach. A coach who quit on us. If you don't want to be known as a complete imbecile show the better deal we turned down.
I know this. Any poster saying we got fleeced is either a troll, a idiot or a post generator.
We got a low 1st and a 3rd for a coach. A coach who quit on us. If you don't want to be known as a complete imbecile show the better deal we turned down.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:12 pm to LSUgrad88
Anybody got the chart that shows what the 29th and next years first would get us this year if we had a qb slip?
Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:39 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
Anyway you addressed your prior statement by saying “of course we can use it.” And you’re right, this time.
Well I’m certainly not suggesting we don’t use it.
quote:
I’m debating the accuracy of saying a team with a crap load of needs can’t address at least one of them with the 29th pick in the draft.
What needs and what pick would you suggest?
You called me “phenomenally stupid”. So either shut up or contribute to the conversation.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:42 pm to BiggaGeauxrilla
quote:
Anybody got the chart that shows what the 29th and next years first would get us this year if we had a qb slip?
Imo we’d need to be in the 15-20 range for this to be accomplishable
All the other teams in position to get a qb need one or could deal down to that 15-20 or even higher
Next years pick is worthless at this stage. Broncos could win the fricking Super Bowl for all we know.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 7:51 pm to DJ3K
I didn’t think we would get more than 1 1st but I sure as hell didn’t think we would give up a 3rd.
Popular
Back to top
