- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
BiggaGeauxrilla
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | North Louisiana |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3932 |
| Registered on: | 12/23/2017 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Hearing great things
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 7/7/26 at 4:15 pm to John Rambeaux
quote:
I thought your source left?
Do you all not understand how the donor networks actually work? The people that donate money expect and are given some insight into the programs they support. These conversations happen over lunches, fund raisers, business meetings etc. These things get talked about all the time regardless if you knew the former GM in Phillys case on a personal level or not. You obviously get to that point by having some personal relationships to people around the program. Problem is every time one of them comes on here yall attack and rip them apart accusing them of being full of shite. Yall have ran off just about every somewhat insider there’s ever been on here. They are all talking to the same people everyone else is. You think Mascona and Wilson Alexander, Shea Dixon talk daily to Lane, Verge and Billy Glasscock?
re: Who beat up Lonn?
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 7/6/26 at 11:49 am to L S Usetheforce
I dunno but Hayes Fawcett just reported the guy that did this just committed to Ole Miss and he chose Ole Miss over LSU.
re: An angry Jay Johnson
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 7/4/26 at 5:23 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Is he angry or does he just have more time given no postseason interference?
Probably both, Woodward handcuffed the baseball program too.
re: What’s the worst game you’ve ever seen at Tiger Stadium?
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 7/3/26 at 10:13 pm to papasmurf1269
Miss st game Dak kicked our arse
re: LSU Baseball lands Freshman All American OF Angel Laya
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 7/3/26 at 6:21 pm to Tank77
Damn that’s big. Creates a ton of depth in the OF. Stainfield and Brown showed you last year why that’s so important.
re: Deuce Geralds Jacked .. SEC Effed
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 7/3/26 at 4:32 pm to lsufanva
Body type, physique and builds, they are very similar. He obviously probably won’t be as successful as the best DT of all time but I get the comparison.
re: Had Paul Skenes lost his mojo?
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 7/1/26 at 9:59 pm to Falco
Concerning
re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/30/26 at 11:40 am to Dicken Nuggets
[quote]Also, I wouldn't call paying a young man and his family hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to play football exploitation. What they were doing before NIL was exploitation
What happens when a kid from Mississippi gets a offer from Southern Miss as a up and coming sophomore kid and he signs a 200k a year deal his high school sophomore season because he has only offers from Centeral Arkansas, New Mexico st. Etc. but in the fine print he has a 1 million dollar buy out. Kid blows up his senior season and is getting offers for 600k a year from Florida, Auburn and Ole Miss but he's stuck with Southern Miss. While they will commit 2.4 to a kid they aren't going to comitt 3.4 to a kid to buy him out and he's stuck. In the case with Brewster, there's allegations of land and houses and including money. Thats extremely complicated and being used as leverage against him at this point to keep him at Texas Tech and he can't even legally play there yet. Thats exploitation. I wouldn't want LSU doing that either. There has to be guardrails with this stuff or its going to snow ball out of control even more.
What happens when a kid from Mississippi gets a offer from Southern Miss as a up and coming sophomore kid and he signs a 200k a year deal his high school sophomore season because he has only offers from Centeral Arkansas, New Mexico st. Etc. but in the fine print he has a 1 million dollar buy out. Kid blows up his senior season and is getting offers for 600k a year from Florida, Auburn and Ole Miss but he's stuck with Southern Miss. While they will commit 2.4 to a kid they aren't going to comitt 3.4 to a kid to buy him out and he's stuck. In the case with Brewster, there's allegations of land and houses and including money. Thats extremely complicated and being used as leverage against him at this point to keep him at Texas Tech and he can't even legally play there yet. Thats exploitation. I wouldn't want LSU doing that either. There has to be guardrails with this stuff or its going to snow ball out of control even more.
re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/29/26 at 9:26 pm to TigernMS12
I don't feel sorry for anyone either and I support them and the opportunity to capitalize on their abilities but there needs to be guardrails in place to limit the exploitation. Allowing colleges to sign high school athletes to contractual NIL deals prior to enrollment or even signing with the actual school is only creating a ton of future legalities.
re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/29/26 at 6:36 pm to TigernMS12
quote:
You seem to think these kids are just making these decisions alone after being prayed upon by agents and schools. No state lets a minor enter into a contract unless there is parental consent (and yes I know this doesn’t amount to much in many cases where moma/daddy want the money too)
Exactly my point...You think even 50% of these situations, the parents or legal guardians are equipped with the experience and knowledge to navigate these situations responsibly and not get taking advantage of?
re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/29/26 at 6:22 pm to NijaPlease
quote:
You'll have to show me where Sorsby played for Tech. Dumbass.
You'll have to show me where Texas Tech wasn't just sucking everyone off in the Texas court system to try and get him cleared to play. Yall are the absolute last fan base to come in here preaching about taking the moral high road and doing whats best for anyone. It took your states dumb arse attorney general sticking his head up his arse, threatening lawsuits to get TT to do the right thing. I hope Sorsby is taking that five million he stole from Oil boy and betting 2 mil of it on yall going 8-4 this year.
re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/29/26 at 4:18 pm to NijaPlease
quote:
Bet you wouldn't be saying that if it was LSU who had already signed him
Definitely would, It doesn't bother me to actually have rules around protecting teenagers in high school from making short sided contractual obligations to college football teams. Or would I have a problem with any thing that is enforced to protect the school or the game, ya know like betting on football games...
re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/29/26 at 12:11 am to lsusteve1
Thank you, thats crazy thats allowed. He hasn't even graduated high school yet. If an entity wants to pay a high schooler to do name, image and likeness thats fine but it shouldn't have any ties to a college until that player is officially signed and eligible to play with that institution. A 16 year old kid getting financially and legally locked in to a school and it being contractually leveraged against them should be illegal just on principle alone.
re: LSU “Feels Better Than Ever” On Flip Chances For 5 Star+ DL Jalen Brewster | UPDATE 6/30
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/28/26 at 9:42 pm to iPad
What "buyout" are they referencing? Is this just how they are defining paying more than TT as far as nil goes or is there already a contractual obligation hes made to TT?
re: Marcos Paz has entered transfer portal
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/26/26 at 6:44 pm to Tigernomics
Something never looked right with him but you can't consistently loose guys like this with that amount of potential if he gets it figured out.
re: LSU Expected To Flip Four Star Safety Karnell “Greedy” James From Texas
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/24/26 at 1:49 pm to 304tiger
You see he’s committed to Texas and has offers from Ohio State, Oregon, Georgia and LSU, I’m willing to bet he’s a four star top 250 kinda guy.
re: NCAA Five for Five
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/23/26 at 3:09 pm to BiggaGeauxrilla
For schools with current student-athletes who may be eligible for hardship waivers or extensions of eligibility, the Cabinet indicated that the deadline to submit any waiver requests to NCAA staff is July 31. After that date, waivers would no longer be available for current student-athletes or prospects.
Student-athletes whose fourth season of collegiate eligibility was completed by spring 2026: No additional eligibility.
Currently enrolled student-athletes with eligibility remaining after the 2025-26 academic year: Flexibility for schools to apply the age-based model or continue with the previous eligibility rules (four seasons to compete with five total years of eligibility), whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2027: Age-based model only.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2026, regardless of planned enrollment date: Age-based model only.
Prospects who graduated prior to spring 2026 and have not enrolled: The NCAA Eligibility Center will review the prospect's individual circumstances and apply the age-based model or existing delayed enrollment eligibility rules, whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Student-athletes whose fourth season of collegiate eligibility was completed by spring 2026: No additional eligibility.
Currently enrolled student-athletes with eligibility remaining after the 2025-26 academic year: Flexibility for schools to apply the age-based model or continue with the previous eligibility rules (four seasons to compete with five total years of eligibility), whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2027: Age-based model only.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2026, regardless of planned enrollment date: Age-based model only.
Prospects who graduated prior to spring 2026 and have not enrolled: The NCAA Eligibility Center will review the prospect's individual circumstances and apply the age-based model or existing delayed enrollment eligibility rules, whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
re: NCAA Five for Five
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/23/26 at 3:04 pm to sportsfan
It wouldn’t be retroactive to players currently enrolled or count towards anyone outside of this window for this sporting year is how I understand it. It’s something that will pretty much be applied to all incoming freshmen and players going forward.
“The change will not be applied to athletes who completed their fourth season of college eligibility by the conclusion of the spring 2026 season. For student-athletes who are currently enrolled and have eligibility after this past calendar year, there is flexibility for schools to either be able to apply the new eligibility model or continue with the old model, with the deciding factor being which model is better suited for the athlete.”
“The change will not be applied to athletes who completed their fourth season of college eligibility by the conclusion of the spring 2026 season. For student-athletes who are currently enrolled and have eligibility after this past calendar year, there is flexibility for schools to either be able to apply the new eligibility model or continue with the old model, with the deciding factor being which model is better suited for the athlete.”
re: Kaden Henderson #1 lb in country announcement on June 18th?
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/18/26 at 1:07 pm to thumperpait
This approach just seems so much more unpredictable and risky than the transfer dominant model. Tho both are necessary, they seem to be putting more eggs in the recruiting basket.
re: How did lsu beat ou in the sec tourney?
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/17/26 at 9:13 pm to nicholastiger
I dunno but seeing an offensive juggernaut like Georgia getting absolutely demolished in Omaha is making me want all pitchers out of the portal from here on out.
re: Brendan Sorsby to Supplemental Draft | Pete Thamel Reporting
Posted by BiggaGeauxrilla on 6/15/26 at 7:48 pm to iPad
I guess, the fact it took this amount of legalities and pressure from everyone to even get this to a “mutual parting” of ways says everything about money, government and college football that needs to be said.
Popular
1












