Started By
Message
locked post

Marcus Davenport- long term contract discussion

Posted on 4/21/22 at 11:09 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179966 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 11:09 am
I think most of us can admit that the talent is real, he's a dual threat in pass rush and run stoppage, he's strong, long, and has produced when on the field. yes. Problem is being on the field. His talent probably warrants a top 5 type contract long term. His production hasn't been there. Coming off 9 sacks in 11 games.

So question, what type of production and health combo are you looking for this year to warrant such a large contract? Even if he stays healthy for say 14-15 games this year, does that make you comfortable enough to extend long term? He's a talent that would be sorely missed if he walks after this year.

Leaving below cap contracts of DE's in the league.

LINK
Posted by PhillyTiger90
Not Phillytiger9
Member since Dec 2015
11969 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 11:10 am to
He'll probably hurt himself trying to sign the contract and miss another 4-6 weeks
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
19786 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 11:38 am to
The best ability is Availability…….can’t expect him to start playing 13/15 games a year. Pass if he wants top 5 money.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76261 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 11:43 am to
Nicknamed “4-6 weeks”.

A dilemma.

I’d probably invest in something team-friendly after this year, give him one more chance to show.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22284 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 11:48 am to
My initial thought would be extend him in the $15M per year range (puts him as the 15th-17th highest) w/ per game bonuses, sack escalators, etc.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
10897 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 11:55 am to
He sucks. He’s basically half a defensive end because he can only play half a season at the most.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32409 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 12:03 pm to
I think it's fair to sign him to a fair size contract like 15m with incentives, games played, sacks, all pro which can net him 20mil
Posted by bayou39
Member since Nov 2012
630 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

He sucks. He’s basically half a defensive end because he can only play half a season at the most.


He doesn’t suck he is injury prone … there’s a big difference …. He is not half a de he is a solid de when he plays …. Your analogy belittles the man …. Guess you would say armstead is half a tackle … lol whatever that means
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
29761 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 12:44 pm to
He's an absolute monster and yes, we need to re-sign him
Posted by PenguinPubes
Frozen Tundra
Member since Jan 2018
11876 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 1:16 pm to
He is an absolute monster. But it’s have to be a team friendly or incentive heavy contract with the amount of time he misses
Posted by hellsu
Northshore via Westbank
Member since Jan 2009
4162 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 1:18 pm to
When healthy he is a load. Great against the run and pass.
He has missed a full season of games in 4 years. 17 games.
Cam Jordan has missed 1 game in 11 seasons. That is insane.
Posted by BRL79
Member since Mar 2014
3138 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

My initial thought would be extend him in the $15M per year range (puts him as the 15th-17th highest) w/ per game bonuses, sack escalators, etc


No thanks on the 15 per year salary. Start much lower than that then throw in the bonuses and escalators based on games played and production. I love him on the field but that isn't often enough
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179966 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

No thanks on the 15 per year salary. Start much lower than that then throw in the bonuses and escalators based on games played and production.


this is when people post things that aren't close to reality.
Posted by MaxxPain2
Member since Oct 2021
1474 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 2:23 pm to
He is a one man wrecking crew comparable to the likes of a young Reggie White.

Sign him to a long term deal with language about staying healthy.
Posted by BRL79
Member since Mar 2014
3138 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

this is when people post things that aren't close to reality

Reality is if he can't stay on the field get him the frick outta here
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62978 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 3:39 pm to
Honestly, I’d consider extending him now. Cam finally turned it on and had a great season, and we drafted Turner in the 1st round who seemed to have been pretty impressive before he got hurt. And we’ve got Granderson, etc…we are pretty good at DE without Davenport. Which gives us leverage, and due to his injury history, he may take something like $12-$14/per now instead of gambling on himself. And for him, it’d be much more of a “gamble” than a “bet” at this point.

I think he’s All Pro/best player on our defense if healthy, so if he actually does stay healthy and put a monster season together, he’d probably price himself out of what we could reasonably afford, considering our depth at DE. And he’d have no incentive to re-sign with us over any other team at that point, whereas we’re obviously the only team that can offer him anything long-term right now. I’m a big fan and think he can be great, and I’d hate for us to be put in the weird position of hoping he doesn’t have a great season, just so that we can afford to keep him.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179966 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 3:41 pm to
I'd offer him 18 mill a year right now... maybe around 40 mill guaranteed and hope he takes that.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62978 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

I'd offer him 18 mill a year right now... maybe around 40 mill guaranteed and hope he takes that.


I just said 12-14 now based on the 15 number thrown out after this season. But I haven’t studied the DE numbers throughout the league, but if the top guys project to make $25+ after the market is re-set next offseason, I’d be fine with offering him 18 now with only 40 guaranteed. I don’t think that’s a huge risk for somebody of his talent and production when healthy. I do think it’s a risk to let him play this 5th year without an extension, though.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179966 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

I do think it’s a risk to let him play this 5th year without an extension, though.




exactly. the risk slices both ways.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34976 posts
Posted on 4/21/22 at 4:31 pm to
In the past the saints would get ahead of some of these contracts.

It seems the last few years that has changed.

Either way they are going to re-sign davenport.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram