- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Brock Bowers or Rome Odunze are still on the board at 14, do you take one of them?
Posted on 4/20/24 at 7:29 am to Pels_Yaz
Posted on 4/20/24 at 7:29 am to Pels_Yaz
As long as it’s one of the top OT’s and not a reach, that’s fine. Seems like a real possibility Fashanu is there. We should run to the podium.
I honestly wouldn’t be mad if our 1st 2 picks were on the OL. It’s not a sexy pick by any means but games are won up front. If we can hit on an OT and versatile guy who can play anywhere on the line, that’d be huge.
We simply aren’t going to fill all of our needs with one draft. Might as well start from the inside out.
I honestly wouldn’t be mad if our 1st 2 picks were on the OL. It’s not a sexy pick by any means but games are won up front. If we can hit on an OT and versatile guy who can play anywhere on the line, that’d be huge.
We simply aren’t going to fill all of our needs with one draft. Might as well start from the inside out.
This post was edited on 4/20/24 at 7:30 am
1
Posted on 4/20/24 at 8:31 am to jamal
quote:
We simply aren’t going to fill all of our needs with one draft
All the more reason you shouldn’t pass on a stud. This team needs to start to reload top end talent on this roster going forward, with eyes to 2026 and beyond. Kamara is on the wrong side of it, Lattimore could be gone. Who are the young stars of this team? Olave? We need dudes. Look at any contender, they have top end talent we severely lack
And we certainly need to add to the OL room. But we need a lot of things.
This post was edited on 4/20/24 at 8:35 am
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:07 pm to LSUPilot07
As much as we need offensive lineman, I would not pass on Bowers.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:34 pm to LSUPilot07
Bowers
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:35 pm to Tvilletiger
WILL IT HAPPEN
RAIDERS STILL HAVE TO PICK
RAIDERS STILL HAVE TO PICK
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:39 pm to Tvilletiger
Well shite
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Does pel_spaz still post? Haven’t seen him in awhile. Buddy went 20 pages shite talking the best TE in the league
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:33 pm to GynoSandberg
Not gonna lie, didn't think he would be this good blocking. Receiving absolutely, because he runs routes like a receiver.
Luxury we couldn't afford
Luxury we couldn't afford
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:35 pm to GynoSandberg
Bunch of silliheads in this thread.
Latu also has a 78.1 PFF grade (with good run/pass splits)
Latu also has a 78.1 PFF grade (with good run/pass splits)
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:36 pm to htran90
quote:
Luxury we couldn't afford
We need receiving threats
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
Latu has a bunch of pressures but no sacks. He’d fit in well here.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:39 pm to DBG
Sounds like Davenport, whom everyone loved here
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:42 pm to DBG
I noticed watching the Raiders-Rams that Andrus Peat isn't starting.
Saw him suited up though.
I like Fuaga and he looks promising, but Bowers is a legit bad arse.
I can't believe the few that were doubting the guy.
Fuaga was the right pick based off need for a tackle.
Saw him suited up though.
I like Fuaga and he looks promising, but Bowers is a legit bad arse.
I can't believe the few that were doubting the guy.
Fuaga was the right pick based off need for a tackle.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Not sure what's worse.
Lol
Lol
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:48 pm to LooseCannon22282
I thought Bowers would be like Dallas Clark. Really good player but I was skeptical of drafting him that high.
He’s off to a great start but he also gets like 10 targets per game for a bad offense
He’s off to a great start but he also gets like 10 targets per game for a bad offense
Posted on 10/20/24 at 7:57 pm to LSUPilot07
Whoops
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 10/20/24 at 8:03 pm to DBG
I always thought Bowers was a pipe dream.
Even had he made one pick down to the Saints, I think they are still picking Fuaga.
no doubt. The Raiders will be playing from behind a lot which should allow him plenty of chances to rack up stats.
We play the raiders late in the year and TE's have given this defense trouble. Hopefully Bowers has the flu that week
Even had he made one pick down to the Saints, I think they are still picking Fuaga.
quote:
He’s off to a great start but he also gets like 10 targets per game for a bad offense
no doubt. The Raiders will be playing from behind a lot which should allow him plenty of chances to rack up stats.
We play the raiders late in the year and TE's have given this defense trouble. Hopefully Bowers has the flu that week
Posted on 10/20/24 at 8:08 pm to DBG
quote:
He’s off to a great start but he also gets like 10 targets per game for a bad offense
He still catches 78% of targets. That tells you it's not just volume, but efficiency to match (like Thomas and Brees)
Posted on 10/20/24 at 8:11 pm to htran90
His aDot is 18th among tight ends. It’s mostly a volume thing.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 8:14 pm to DBG
quote:
He’s off to a great start but he also gets like 10 targets per game for a bad offense
8.6 - elite pass catchers gets targeted. He’s a rookie TE running as a team’s #1. No different than a Nabers who is seeing 12 targets/g
PFF’s highest graded rookie pass catcher, including WRs. Actually, highest graded offensive rookie, period
Page 22 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News