Started By
Message

re: Do the Saints really need a DT at No. 12?

Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:12 pm to
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9963 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

A player like Shelton shouldn't actually post many stats.


Completely disagree. He should do more than simply occupy blockers. You don't draft a two down run stuffer at #12. That is a 2nd-3rd round pick material. I don't think Shelton is total trash. I think he is a two down player and not as good as Peat. People were expecting him to shore up the run defense and have any effect on pass rush. I do not see that at all.

PFF also rated Peat higher than Shelton.
Posted by partywiththelombardi
Member since May 2012
11601 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:17 pm to
I like Peat long term but neither of these positions are easy adjustments especially coming from the Pac 12 where you dont meet grown arse men nearly as often. Peat is a lot more fortunate IMO though due to landing in a much better situation. Being surrounded by Drew, Unger, Armstead, and learning from Strief I think will do wonders for him.

Shelton is fricked in Cleveland.

Also True NT don't really produce stats...Haloti Ngata and Vince Wilfork are both considered top tier NT's for most of their careers and neither produced many stats...they are facilitators for the rest of the defense in a 3-4.
This post was edited on 2/25/16 at 2:34 pm
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
28923 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Kiper stated he had 25 defensive line prospects with first or second round grades.



Cool. Hope we draft two in the first two rounds.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31712 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 3:00 pm to
I don't. I don't think there's one "monster" in the middle this year. There is a ton of depth but from what I've seen, most of the defensive line propsects just seem like middle of the round journeyman guys. Guys that will start and be ok, but not to the value of a first rounder.


I think the difference between the guys like Robinson from Alabama, who is garnered as a first rounder and a guy like Collins from Nebraska, who is a projected third rounder, is small.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33793 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

I understand the thinking, but I personally disagree with that philosophy when it comes to positional depth in the draft


yep, same.

A handful of those 25 D-line players Kiper has graded that high will also be a bust. That's just the way it is and has always been.

I think its great the position is loaded this year in the draft and we have a relatively high pick just outside of the Top 10. We should be able to get a really good player. No need to get cute and wait and see who falls and take a guy in the mid-to-late rounds in my opinion. I hope like hell we pick up a D-lineman in free agency who can come here and be a starter too. I think if we do that then we might not necessarily have to use the 1st pick on a D-line player. But even then I still think that it would be a good move. We had absolutely no depth on the line last year and to make matters worse the same could be said about the LB's too... because of the injuries.

I think its a no brainer on what position to take.. D-line first then LB second.

But I'm with you, we'll probably take a corner or something. LOL
Posted by JustinT37
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2014
1835 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 3:13 pm to
I agree with you a bit, but how would you feel if we drafted Shelton and were 30th vs the run? Or better yet, a year from now, how would anyone feel if we drafted A'Shawn Robinson or Sheldon Rankins, 12th overall, and we still were near dead last vs the run. With no sacks, no hurries, no pressures, what do you think?
Posted by patendedgmf
BR
Member since Jun 2006
1443 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 3:14 pm to
Let's all agree we need a DT in this class. Thankfully it is deep. I've thought Austin Johnson in the 2nd could happen for a while, but he is moving up boards.

What do we have working for us? Time. Plenty of time to examine the medicals that come out on Jaylon Smith.

Maybe they come back TERRIBLE.
Maybe Myles Jack somehow falls? or DeForest Buckner? We don't pass on either.
Maybe a team looking for a QB needs to move up.

Maybe we fall in love with A'Shawn more so than the guys that COULD be there in the 2nd. I don't see a bad option for us in the 1st. There are at least 12 players that all could be great on this team.

Posted by partywiththelombardi
Member since May 2012
11601 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

what do you think?

Hypothetically speaking of course...it would depend on the entire team and how those stats were accrued.

A true NT if they are doubled on every snap I would not expect production but to simply root where he is to block rushing lanes and use his hands to disrupt passing lanes. If the play is flushed to him I expect him to make a move on it...otherwise anchor down and watch/anticipate the play.

His double team in a 3-4 front allows 1 on 1 situations for both DE's and your 1 rush LB. So in this perfect world scenario Cam Jordan and Kikaha would be responsible for generating the pass rush by beating their 1 blocker. Bobby Richardson would also be in a 1 on 1 but he is not someone who really makes you pay for that kind of thing. They would be your playmakers or any additional blitzer on that play.

Against the run...if we were 30th I would like to see where the big runs occurred...like a shot chart in basketball. Considering your NT takes up 2 blocks and the other QB doesnt block there are 10 defenders left for 7 blockers and 1 RB. If your big run hot spots are outside of the NT gap then I do not see how you blame the interior DL for someone else's gap responsibility. You may be giving up the big plays but it is not the NT that is at fault for it in that case.

**Now if your NT is being eliminated by 1 on 1 blocking then he would be at fault. A NT should never be taken out by 1 blocker. If the offense only puts 1 man on him the NT should be able to bull rush what is most likely a center and provide massive regret for the OC as his play gets blown the frick up.

quote:

if we drafted A'Shawn Robinson or Sheldon Rankins, 12th overall


I have already voiced my concerns over Robinson. I would not be happy drafting him.

Rankins is not a true NT IMO. He is a pass rushing DT capable of playing NT. He has actual disruptive pass rushing skills...however I do not think he can handle a double team and would need a player to take it from him. He would be best suited in a 4-3.



Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28619 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 3:49 pm to
Absolutely, Bobby Richardson can't do it all by himself
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72113 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Rankins is not a true NT IMO. He is a pass rushing DT capable of playing NT. He has actual disruptive pass rushing skills...however I do not think he can handle a double team and would need a player to take it from him. He would be best suited in a 4-3


You just said you want a DT that's going to get double. Now you want one who's going to beat the double team ?



Aaron Donald is 285 lbs.

Give me speed, power, and technique over some fat blob
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Absolutely, Bobby Richardson can't do it all by himself


DT is one of the positions that takes the longest to develop in the NFL. That's from the mouth of Dick Lebeau. Richardson had a pretty dang good rookie year for a Dlineman although I know he did play alot of DE also. I'm excited to see if he can make another big step next season.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 6:31 pm to
If a position has high value in the draft where you can get quality guys in the 2nd or 3rd then you go with best player available in the draft. If that's a DT, take him but you should seriously consider how deep the DL class is before you draft one whereas if you took an amazing LB that has equal value it might be a smarter pick due to how deep it is on DL.

DT is one of the highest bust % in the NFL coming from draft too. They're not an easy position to evaluate compared to something like LB where they're usually considered safer picks.
This post was edited on 2/25/16 at 6:35 pm
Posted by partywiththelombardi
Member since May 2012
11601 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

You just said you want a DT that's going to get double. Now you want one who's going to beat the double team ?


Actually I said neither.

Someone asked me about what I liked about Star and Shelton....I made a case for why people originally wanted Shelton and that has since dragged on and on for about 3-4 posts too many.

The DT/NT you target obviously depends on what you are running a 3-4 or 4-3. Everyone says get a Donald, Sapp, Glover which is fine if you are running a 4-3. That fat block eater/NT is going to let that guy run free to do what he does...its why Suh as talented as he is was not a fan of being put into a 3-4.

I was stressing the basic principles of the 3-4 not making a case for a NT. I was simply stating how you can not measure a NT off stats alone.

I have made it perfectly clear in every post regarding the draft what I want. Jaylon or a DE in the 1st and then the Best DT available in the 2nd.

Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28747 posts
Posted on 2/25/16 at 6:56 pm to


This post was edited on 2/26/16 at 5:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram