- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/7/25 at 6:44 am to burke985
I guarantee you if either of these two QBs the Saints have now are able to get 10 years of starting experience in the NFL they will be at a bare minimum as good as Derek Carr was for this team.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:57 am to Fgiord
We would be 5-4 with Carr
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:06 am to infantry1026
quote:
He definitely wasn’t a GREAT QB, but the people who think this are fricking retarded. He had around 100QB rating in his time here. He was a DECIDEDLY above average-good QB and the Saints paid him market value. Now if you want to argue that they shouldn’t have gone that route to begin with…..fine, but to say that he was over paid or bad is ignorant.
What was his QBR in the red zone? Did his stats match the eye test to you? Did you even watch the games?
Guy was below .500 as a starter. He never won a playoff game. He’s a career loser, DECIDEDLY.
We could have easily signed Baker Mayfield for what we gave Carr. Don’t talk to me about market value.
Imagine white knighting for Derek fricking Carr.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:10 am to Snipe
quote:
I guarantee you if either of these two QBs the Saints have now are able to get 10 years of starting experience in the NFL they will be at a bare minimum as good as Derek Carr was for this team.
Ehhhh, I don’t know about Shough yet. But Rattler doesn’t have it. Carr is slightly above average…slightly. Which means he was a long term starting NFL QB. I think Rattler’s ceiling is long term back-up that is slightly below average.
This post was edited on 11/7/25 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 11/7/25 at 10:02 am to Buzz Lightbeer
quote:
Guy was below .500 as a starter. He never won a playoff game. He’s a career loser, DECIDEDLY.
This is the kind of retarded shite I was talking about. The Raiders are the worst run organization in all of sports (arguably), and STILL had very good years there. Carr (while here)had basically this same roster (and Pete C as his OC) at 9 wins 2 years ago. He was pretty damn good here
And I am not “White Knighting” for Derek Carr, I am actually glad that we are leaning into the rebuild now, but I am tired of fans acting like POS humans where he is concerned. He did what they paid him to do, but I bet you love MT13
We get it, you don’t like him……but acting like an irrational girl isn’t the answer
This post was edited on 11/7/25 at 10:57 am
Posted on 11/7/25 at 1:06 pm to burke985
Carr wasn’t bad, just wasn’t worth what we were paying him. Our current QB situation is worse, but it’s also WAY cheaper.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 1:13 pm to infantry1026
Sure pal, if you believe Derek Carr was an “above average to good” quarterback, go ahead and die on that hill. But you’ll be dying alone.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 6:24 pm to burke985
Remind me again what are our current QBs contracts compared to Carr?
Posted on 11/7/25 at 10:23 pm to kingbob
quote:
kingbob
Carr wasn’t bad, just wasn’t worth what we were paying him. Our current QB situation is worse, but it’s also WAY cheaper.
You get what you pay for
Posted on 11/8/25 at 10:15 am to burke985
He quit football lol
Posted on 11/8/25 at 10:33 am to burke985
It still would not have made a difference. He would be on IR by now with this OL.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News