- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attorney for Smith family / Attorney for Hayes l Press Conference Recap
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:38 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:38 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Look, you're talking to an attorney that has seen literally hundreds of accident videos. That is a shite video that does not AFFIRMATIVELY show enough.
I have not been arguing that Smith did not hit Hayes. I'm simply arguing that the video doesn't show enough to VERIFY it.
Its just not clear. Anyone saying otherwise is inferring based on what they think they see. A good attorney (not me) would tear that video apart.
Give me a break dude. Did you even watch the video? The fricking hummer is pushed forward
1
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:38 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:They funny thing is, nobody has asked me what I think. I am just a speculating shithead relative of Hayes
I just don't think this was a justified action on Hayes' part.
I think Hayes is guilty of second degree or manslaughter.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:38 pm to Deactived
quote:
Unless there was a camera on the bumper that got smashed from the other vehicle, there is nothing you are going to see to convince you of a hit.
No possible other view a local camera has is going to convince you
That's true. What I think and what is fact are two different things.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:39 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
As I've said again and again and again: There is no VERIFIABLE impact. It is not clear. Anyone arguing otherwise is seeing guessing.
dude we are not in court. It's ok to take your suit off. You know there was contact.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:39 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:Who claimed they hit something? His lawyer is saying the Smiths drove of because they saw no damage. They hadnt been "claimed" to do anything at that point
If someone claimed you hit something, you wouldn't check for damage?
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:39 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Who claimed they hit something?
Whole lot for people in this thread for starters.
When an article comes out with surveillance footage saying the deceased may have been the aggressor due to a possible hit and run, you don't think it's prudent to inspect for damage?
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:40 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Who claimed they hit something?
lol, dude is too stupid for his own good
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:41 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
If someone claimed you hit something, you wouldn't check for damage?
did hayes get out and ask him if he hit him?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:41 pm to Mr.Perfect
quote:
The fricking hummer is pushed forward
Do you have anything to support that it was PUSHED forward? Are you an accident reconstructionist?
Anyway, I'll bow out of this. I'm not talking about the H&R anymore. It isn't relevant.
I want to know:
1) If the gun was in a compartment in the vehicle and not on Smith
2) If his wife was indeed shot first outside the vehicle.
The fact that we know Smith was shot in the back is already pretty bad for Hayes.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:41 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Whole lot for people in this thread for starters.
What are you talking about? Smiths lawyer said they drove off because they "looked and saw no damage" Why were they even looking if contact hadnt been made? At that point, no claims were made by a single soul you moron
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:41 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
lol, dude is too stupid for his own good
I guess that big long thread yesterday where the article did exactly that was just all in my head.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:42 pm to diat150
quote:
did hayes get out and ask him if he hit him?
Lnch is strugglingPosted on 4/13/16 at 1:42 pm to lsupride87
I agree. If they go for murder he will likely get off. If they go for manslaughter he should be convicted
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:42 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
You know there was contact.
I don't know anything.
I THINK there was an extremely small amount of impact. I just don't know it.
And neither do you.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:42 pm to lsupride87
That latest vine coming out, showing debris, is kind of damnning on the "he didn't hit Hayes" argument.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:42 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
When an article comes out with surveillance footage saying the deceased may have been the aggressor due to a possible hit and run, you don't think it's prudent to inspect for damage?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: You are slow today Lnch. Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:42 pm to lsupride87
quote:
What are you talking about?
Ok, you;re talking about Smith getting out and doing that. I've checked for damage after close calls. I highly doubt I'm the only person on the planet to do that too.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:43 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Lnch is struggling
This is going the way of the 2nd video showing cars in front of Hayes for ole Lunchbox.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:43 pm to Fun Bunch
Nobody can tell if there was impact from that video.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:43 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Do you have anything to support that it was PUSHED forward? Are you an accident reconstructionist?
Bruh.... go watch the video again.
Page 13 of 69
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News