- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attorney for Smith family / Attorney for Hayes l Press Conference Recap
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:32 pm to CajunsTigersSaints
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:32 pm to CajunsTigersSaints
Whether or not he hit him or not is irrelevant because it doesn't justify what happened after. I want to hear the self defense police justify firing 10 shots 7 of which were to Will's BACK and two into his wife.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:33 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
No.
I've seen literally hundreds of videos of accidents.
Looking at the video without your lawyer eyes, you dont feel bad to be the only one agreeing with lunchbox over this?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:33 pm to apfour21
Same here.
Of course, they don't want to talk about that. They wanna talk about tire marks, and fender benders, and how that justified homicide.
Of course, they don't want to talk about that. They wanna talk about tire marks, and fender benders, and how that justified homicide.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:34 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I already did, and it's not 100%. It's certainly possible, but it's not 100%. I'd need to see the spare tire cover of the H2 to say it 100%.
no, it is 100%.
you can also see the pictures from the crime scene that show that the tire cover lock on the hummer was damaged from the hit and run and swung open.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:34 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Looking at the video without your lawyer eyes, you dont feel bad to be the only one agreeing with lunchbox over this?
I just love your flip on speculation.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:34 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:Nobody has said that net. You are my baw, but you are making up false talking points to argue against
and how that justified homicide.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:34 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I disagree with you bs about the video
My BS? Ok guy.
Look, you're talking to an attorney that has seen literally hundreds of accident videos. That is a shite video that does not AFFIRMATIVELY show enough.
I have not been arguing that Smith did not hit Hayes. I'm simply arguing that the video doesn't show enough to VERIFY it.
Its just not clear. Anyone saying otherwise is inferring based on what they think they see. A good attorney (not me) would tear that video apart.
If it even mattered. Which it doesn't.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:34 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Until you can. you're doing nothing but speculating. There's a reason Scott Walker says it "appears to show" instead of it "shows."
He knows Will personally. You think he wants to incriminate him like that? He is just doing his job.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:35 pm to CajunsTigersSaints
quote:
Attorney: Will, Racquel were concerned for safety after Hummer braked; they saw no damage, so they continued on their way.
Well that's a lie. They didn't check for damage. They just drove the hell off by pulling into the oncoming lane of traffic to get away.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:35 pm to Fun Bunch
In this instance I'm talking about.
Unless there was a camera on the bumper that got smashed from the other vehicle, there is nothing you are going to see to convince you of a hit.
No possible other view a local camera has is going to convince you
Unless there was a camera on the bumper that got smashed from the other vehicle, there is nothing you are going to see to convince you of a hit.
No possible other view a local camera has is going to convince you
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:35 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
The H&R is meaningless.
Well maybe not now that I think about it. That could give the prosecution a reason to say Hayes is enraged. So I change my stance on this not being important.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:35 pm to diat150
quote:
no, it is 100%.
No it isn't.
quote:
you can also see the pictures from the crime scene that show that the tire cover lock on the hummer was damaged from the hit and run and swung open.
That must be why it swung out when he drove off right after the 100% clear hit....
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:36 pm to diat150
quote:
you can also see the pictures from the crime scene that show that the tire cover lock on the hummer was damaged from the hit and run and swung open.
Smith hit the hummer. But the gate swung open bc of when he smashed Smiths car after most likely.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:36 pm to Mouth
quote:
You think he wants to incriminate him like that? He is just doing his job.
His job isn't to speculate and call it fact.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:36 pm to lsupride87
We're baws
I just don't think this was a justified action on Hayes' part.
I just don't think this was a justified action on Hayes' part.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:37 pm to LNCHBOX
So if the Smith's didnt hit the Hummer, why did their lawyer say they checked and saw no damage? If they didnt hit, why are they even looking or thinking of damage?
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:37 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Looking at the video without your lawyer eyes, you dont feel bad to be the only one agreeing with lunchbox over this?
Again, do I think, after watching all the videos, that he tapped him? Yes, its certainly possible.
Key word: think.
As I've said again and again and again: There is no VERIFIABLE impact. It is not clear. Anyone arguing otherwise is seeing guessing.
Once again, it doesn't matter. I'll just give up on this one, because I don't care about the H&R.
It doesn't matter, at all. A H&R actually happening hurts Hayes more than it helps.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:37 pm to Fun Bunch
What do you think falls off the front of Smith's vehicle?
Why do all the actions following that "hard brake" fall in line with what people do after a fender bender? Hayes pulling off to the side of the road?
why in your estimation does Smith speed off and run the red light?
Why do all the actions following that "hard brake" fall in line with what people do after a fender bender? Hayes pulling off to the side of the road?
why in your estimation does Smith speed off and run the red light?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:38 pm to BRgetthenet
You are a huge nerd if you truly believe ANYONE wants this Hayes cat to walk after committing homicide.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:38 pm to lsupride87
quote:
So if the Smith's didnt hit the Hummer, why did their lawyer say they checked and saw no damage? If they didnt hit, why are they even looking or thinking of damage?
If someone claimed you hit something, you wouldn't check for damage?
Popular
Back to top


1



