Started By
Message

re: What are you guys actuall expecting from our rookie?

Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:03 am to
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116667 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:03 am to
quote:

So if Batum doesn't work out, go immediately to plan D. Take that money and take a flier on cheaper talent that is hitting the age where it might be ready to bloom. Sign a guy like Solomon Hill to a team friendly deal. Something like $4-$7 million for 3 years with the 3rd year being a team option. If he works out your big pieces should be in place if you have to give him more money. If he doesn't you cut him after year to or stretch him after year 1.



Kind of agree here. I don't see this as a 1 year or even 2 year re-tool. This is a 3 year rebuild in my mind.

Get a contributor in the draft, a contributor in FA (all the more if its a guy on a good deal that is ready to bloom), and maybe one of your 2nd rounders makes the team. Get better, go into next year with a team that is on the rise again, that has a draft pick, and has a ton of cap space to really make a run at some guys.

I'm on board the Solomon Hill pain train if the price is right. His 3p% isn't spectacular, but he could be on the rise. If you get, say, Buddy, a Defensive minded wing would be an ideal get.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
39173 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I'm telling you- regardless of what a rational fan might think, the Pels think there is an opportunity to skyrocket up the WC standing with a solid offseason


then we know this organization is certifiably insane and in deep, deep denial, from benson on down
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61649 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:34 am to
quote:

then we know this organization is certifiably insane and in deep, deep denial, from benson on down


I think you're being too pessimistic though. Why do you think a team that won 30 games while losing about 350 games to injury will only be a 25-30 win team? You are basically saying they'll be even worse next year. The moves are there to be made to get them back to that just above .500 level, and in the West that was good enough for the 5 seed this year.
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9963 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:38 am to
quote:

I think you have to pitch Batum if he'll talk to you.


Are you willing to use all of your capspace on him? To get him here we probably need to offer $23M-27M per year for him because that is what it will take to make him interested in NOLA. He is 27 and had some injury issues this past year. Not sure I want to commit that much money to one player with our injury luck.

I think signing S. Hill who is a 3/4 (I think he will be $7-10M) is a great idea. He played the 4 well to clsoe the year in a small ball lineup. Adding someone like Fournier as a 2 or Bazemore or Crabbe as another 2/3 depending on how the draft goes seems necessary considering Qpon is coming off a lost season and we still aren't sure what we have in a rookie or BDJ. That path (Hill plus a 2 or another 2/3) seems more realistic and less risky than maxing or near maxing Batum.

Charlotte has $40M in cap space and is not going to just let Batum walk to a place like New Orleans.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116667 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:52 am to
We won't have 27 million in capspace any. I think its like 21 million or something if we get rid of most of our capholds. I'm sure ATL can correct me.

Spending that 21 million on two players makes more sense than Batum, personally. If you can get Hill and Fournier that's a potentially great offseason. Looks like the Magic are going to do everything they can to keep Fournier though.

So if you can get Crabbe/Hill, you're taking a serious chance that those guys will take the next step. Its not sexy, but I would be ok with it. Continue to get depth and slam into FA a bit more next year.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
39173 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 11:56 am to
quote:

The moves are there to be made to get them back to that just above .500 level,


of course they are
as i said before, we've seen this movie already

i dont want any of those players...they'll be cap clogging veterans without upside. i want what minnesota has, what portland has, what utah has, what phoenix will have (remind me what conference those teams are in? oh, right...)

i'm done with gordon, evans, anderson, asik, ajinca, gee, cunnigham, et al. i want frazier, BJD, davis, holiday and an influx of blue-chip young players that davis can grow with. and if that causes davis to bolt in four years, then sham on this team for miserably failing given TWO triwes to get it right

sorry but making the same mistakes, over and over and over again, is maddening and we must demand a better plan
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61649 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Are you willing to use all of your capspace on him?


I lean yes, although I really don't want to go back to starting a season with 6 NBA players. Any future FA SF better than him is even less likely to sign with us. Good 2 way wings in today's NBA have become the good 2 way centers of the 90s. It's very hard to win at a high level with out one. So I think you have to lock him up if he agrees and hope you can repeat Monty's last season, plug holes mid season, make the playoffs and look like a team on the rise with a much more balanced core of AD/Jrue/Batum
This post was edited on 5/20/16 at 12:15 pm
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9963 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

We won't have 27 million in capspace any. I think its like 21 million or something if we get rid of most of our capholds. I'm sure ATL can correct me.

Spending that 21 million on two players makes more sense than Batum, personally. If you can get Hill and Fournier that's a potentially great offseason. Looks like the Magic are going to do everything they can to keep Fournier though.

So if you can get Crabbe/Hill, you're taking a serious chance that those guys will take the next step. Its not sexy, but I would be ok with it. Continue to get depth and slam into FA a bit more next year.


It seems to me we have to gamble that these young guys can take steps. Fournier, Crabbe, and Hill are 23,24,and 25 so they all mesh with AD's and Jrue's time horizon and still have potential to grow (or fail) as they have limited exposure to full time minutes. Signing Batum puts all eggs in one basket and I don't want to do that (not that I think we will even have the opportunity).
This post was edited on 5/20/16 at 1:22 pm
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61649 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Frank Madden @brewhoop

@DavidFisherTBW Lot of Bucks fans asking me about Monroe + 10 for 6 (because they like Buddy and happy to move Monroe)


I do not want Monroe, but if they took Asik back (they had a top defense with Pachulia so it may not be as crazy as it sounds), I'd have to think about it.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116667 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Monroe + 10 for 6




quote:

Monroe +10 for 6 + Asik


Sign me the frick up. Otherwise bucks can GTFO.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 2:34 pm to
According to BREF, there have been 63 G or GF to play 1500 minutes in their rookie seasons since 05/06-15/16. 17 hit the 43/37 threshold, so 27%.

Again, it's not outrageous to think it happens. But it's more of a hope than an expectation. Rookies most often are wildly inefficient and are typically net negatives. You look for signs of growth, not necessarily actual production.

That said, if they draft a guard and he hits that threshold, the list signifies a solid career, barring injury.

Curry, Thompson, Irving, Eric Gordon, Jrue Holiday, Thornton, Courtney Lee, Collison, Mayo, Roy, Wes Matthews, IT, Augustin, etc.
This post was edited on 5/20/16 at 2:43 pm
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

i want what minnesota has, what portland has, what utah has,


That train left the station when they sent out consecutive lottery picks for Holiday.

quote:

i want frazier, BJD, davis, holiday and an influx of blue-chip young players that davis can grow with


I don't think it's crazy for the team to think they can get back into the playoff picture with that group, #6, and some smart, targeted signings. They need health but the west looks to be fairly mediocre outside of the top 3 or 4 (depending on what the Clippers do)

To paraphrase MM from earlier, just some singles would be nice. They have time to build around Davis again.

The question is will they see that as a possibility and not blow their load this summer to "compete" for a 6-8 seed?
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
39173 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 3:17 pm to
its not too late

1) draft a good player at #6
2) don't blow a nut on a max or near-max free agent
3) let anderson & gordon walk
4) take as many fliers on D-leaguers as possible
5) trade holiday mid year for a pick or young player + expiring
6) secure a high lottery pick next year by not winning
7) draft another good player next year

now you've got three lottery picks, 2 on rookie deals with three more years of davis. the cap will be astronomical and you'll be able to go whale fishing

all of this depends on two things, both without evidence of prior success...the ability to select and develop players and the ability to keep them on the court
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61649 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

now you've got three lottery picks, 2 on rookie deals with three more years of davis. the cap will be astronomical and you'll be able to go whale fishing


You aren't going to land any whales when you haven't made the playoffs for 2 years straight, and those whales also probably won't see you trading Jrue for a future asset as a positive. What you just did may set you up well for the time that AD gets his leverage, IF you draft and trade well, but you just added another lost year to the equation, and you know they don't have the stomach for that.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
39173 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

IF you draft and trade well, but you just added another lost year to the equation, and you know they don't have the stomach for that.


i know they dont
i dont have the stomach for three more years of flailing around only to watch davis leave though

davis raised expectations and its time to step up. id rather they lost with men on base than swinging away at everyone else's high fastball
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

5) trade holiday mid year for a pick or young player + expiring


I don't know how much value Holiday will have league wide. Even assuming no more set backs. Good pgs are everywhere. Holiday is one of the better ones, but how much am I willing to pay if I'm getting 80% of what Holiday gives you? Especially when he will be expiring going into a $108M cap? If they do get a good offer, you have to think hard about it. Just not sure it ever comes.

quote:

6) secure a high lottery pick next year by not winning
7) draft another good player next year


I don't think you can "tank" in year 5 of Davis. If that's the plan, you might as well try to pull a Deron Williams and surprise trade him.

They can do 1-4 on your list, be patient and smart and set themselves up for a decent year without sacrificing their future.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
39173 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 3:44 pm to
i realize it is sub-optimal to be talking about tossing the first season of your superstar's 2nd contract, but i do not see another way to cobble together anything interesting enough to convince him to stay

at the end of this deal he'll be seven years in, have 200MM dollars or so, and will be looking to win. its now or never

and not to go all 20/20, but look at who they could have had if they'd just been patient. masochistic, i know, but it was all right there for them. time to try again

honestly, as a fan and ticket holder, i'd trade rosters right now, davis included, with either minnesota or utah or portland
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61649 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

honestly, as a fan and ticket holder, i'd trade rosters right now, davis included, with either minnesota or utah or portland


Minnesota is in very good shape after years of mismanagement.

If Utah misses the playoffs again and Hayward leaves where will they really be?

I think Portland is doing what the Hornets did in year 2 of CP3. They were good when they had every excuse to be bad and add more talent to the mix and they'll find themselves coming up a good player short at the end of the day.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

realize it is sub-optimal to be talking about tossing the first season of your superstar's 2nd contract, but i do not see another way to cobble together anything interesting enough to convince him to stay


If they trade away one of their few + players for lottery position, Davis is gone anyway. They would be banking on picks being good in 2 years instead of 4. That's just tough to bet on. They do that 4 years ago and those guys are now maturing into quality (hopefully) players with Davis still around for the rest of the decade. Or are assets (again hopefully) to be flipped

Hypothetical-

Benson realizes it's fricked and decides they need to blow it up. They decide to trade Davis and hit reset; forget how crazy or dumb that may be. What type of offers do they get? What would you want them to take?
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9963 posts
Posted on 5/20/16 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Hypothetical-

Benson realizes it's fricked and decides they need to blow it up. They decide to trade Davis and hit reset; forget how crazy or dumb that may be. What type of offers do they get? What would you want them to take?


A superstar locked up for 5 years does not get traded, but we would get a. Kings ransom. Boston would offer pretty much all their draft assets plus players. PHI would offer #1 this year, their 1st next year, the Lakers first and the Sac first plus maybe Noel.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram