Started By
Message

re: Shams says Pelicans are “aggressively pursuing” a top 2-3 pick for Scoot

Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:03 pm to
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
55750 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

No he isn’t lol
he’s more like a veteran buddy
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

This is the highest value BI will have
Disagree. Any team that trades for him is doing so with the intent to keep him long term, not for 2 years. So if it's his final year, he'll only go to a team that knows they'll extend him, so it's really irrelevant. Much like AD, he had only 1 year left and the Lakers were bidding against no one and we still got the biggest haul ever at the time.

But also, saying this is the highest value BI will have, that also means that value is also had by the Pels, we can enjoy that value still by not trading him as well.
quote:

I doubt anyone will want a max player over 30 who is not an All-Star. I love CJ but he has little value in the league under the new CBA. It will be basically impossible to have 3 max players. So another team would need to want CJ as one of their two max players. I just don’t see it
His contract decreases over years, which is a very critical component.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Lol he is not a positive asset. Pretend your a GM what would you trade for CJ?
If you think he's the missing piece like we did, a 1st... easily.
quote:

Most teams would say give me a protected first to take him.
zero teams would get that, someone would give up an asset for him, I have no doubts about that.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:10 pm to
“But also, saying this is the highest value BI will have, that also means that value is also had by the Pels, we can enjoy that value still by not trading him as well.”- what does that even mean lol?? We’re talking about trade value, if you keep a player he has no trade value or his value decreases lol. If we go by your theory we should never trade expiring players that we wont resign because we can enjoy that value ourselves. This is nonsense lol

Yes CJ’s contract decreases but at 31 already at the start of his extension his play most likely also decreases. Teams do not value his contract a positive asset because his decreasing play will not match his decreasing but still pretty high contract extension.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:12 pm to
Lol you think a team would give a first for CJ with his recent play last season on that contract extension. Hahahaha wow
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Lol you think a team would give a first for CJ with his recent play last season on that contract extension. Hahahaha wow
Without question


You can laugh but the missed valuation is on your end.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:18 pm to
GMs would laugh and hang up. I get you like CJ but this is a horrendous take. You literally are looking at CJ from pelicans fans eyes. The rest of NBA circles would think thats a joke. If he was expiring maybe a heavily protected first. But on that extension you’ll be lucky to get some expensive non productive role players- if your lucky.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

GMs would laugh and hang up
Griff would laugh and hang up too. See, I just proved you wrong.

Those types of statements are useless, to be honest
quote:

You literally are looking at CJ from pelicans fans eyes. The rest of NBA circles would think thats a joke. If he was expiring maybe a heavily protected first. But on that extension you’ll be lucky to get some expensive non productive role players- if your lucky
. He's a good basketball player, that's the piece you're missing.

Name the last player on CJ's level that had to have a 1st attached to be dealt...
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:40 pm to
First of all we’re talking about the new CBA landscape so referencing old trades is kind of useless. Second these trades dont happen because most teams don’t want to dump a guy they just signed for an extension and attach a first. Im just telling you what teams will ask for not if the pelicans will actually make that trade. Personally, I think Pels value him for the culture but also know they’re stuck with him because they won’t get close to the value back and dont want to attach a first. Hence, why you see Zion and BI name pop up in these Scoot trade rumors and not CJ. Griff would never try to trade CJ for a first because he would be a laughing stock but fine lets keep that statement out of it. What you dont get is just cause your a “good” player currently doesn’t mean your a positive asset. I like CJ and think hes a great culture guy and solid player but on that contract he is not at all a positive asset for nba teams. We overpaid because he was a great culture fit and we need that. That doesn’t equate to him being a positive asset for the rest of the NBA.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13474 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

you don’t know ball. Also BI didn’t shoot at all from 3 his first 3 years in the league. Scoot is solid from midrange and can attack the rim with ease. Scoots shot has improved. Was like 18% from 3 two years ago and went up to 33% this season

might want to check your numbers there.
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
55750 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

might want to check your numbers there.
tankathon has him at 32.4% from 3 in 25 games. They might be including/excluding the showcase games the gleague does
Posted by higgsBoson
Democratic Party
Member since Jan 2012
1592 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

We overpaid because he was a great culture fit and we need that. That doesn’t equate to him being a positive asset for the rest of the NBA.


Exactly. When we got CJ there were articles that teams considered him a negative asset. He has more value on the Pels than most teams because he’s a leader. No one will pay max contract for his production under this CBA. Teams won’t be making “f’it” all in moves anymore for fringe all star players. It just won’t happen anymore. So you’d need a team who also wants vet leadership without two max contracts. That’s a tall order to find.
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 6/12/23 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

I, and most, think Scoot is going to be better than BI


Most? What is that based on? Projections?
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
19350 posts
Posted on 6/13/23 at 12:08 am to
quote:

this doesn't happen without giving up one of trey BI or zion along with 14 and probably 1-2 other 1sts
So we have to give up 3 firsts and one of BI, Zion and Trey? No thanks.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 12:08 am
Posted by six4lsu
Member since Sep 2009
353 posts
Posted on 6/13/23 at 12:35 am to
Look this trade can only happen if either BI or Zion are included. The writing is on the wall... BI at game 5 with Herb and Willie all but confirms that the trade would be for Zion.

No team would value Zion more than Charlotte. Zion went to Duke, he is from South Carolina...he is a Jordan brand client. Jordan wants to sell the team and Zion would instantly increase the teams perception/ value.

I imagine the trade would be something like

Zion + a minor player to make the numbers work (kira, temple, etc)

2023 #2, Mark Williams, Gordon Hayward, and a few future picks. Probably like a protected first and/or swaps.





Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17318 posts
Posted on 6/13/23 at 5:38 am to
quote:

Zion + a minor player to make the numbers work (kira, temple, etc) 2023 #2, Mark Williams, Gordon Hayward, and a few future picks. Probably like a protected first and/or swaps

While this is not bad, I’m not trading a guy that has shown he has best player in the league potential for anything less than a KD package.

McNamara is back on Twitter and had an interview one i would love
quote:

Portland gets BI and Jonas, Suns get Nurk and Simons, Pels get Scoot and Ayton
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1880 posts
Posted on 6/13/23 at 6:26 am to
quote:

might want to check your numbers there.

tankathon has him at 32.4% from 3 in 25 games. They might be including/excluding the showcase games the gleague does


Mac is right. Sam Vecenie talked about this on his pod 3-4 days ago. Some how this 27% number has been circulating in the media but Scoot shot 32% from 3 last year and people just don’t know how to read g-league stats.

If you have questions on Scoots shooting, I’d encourage you to listen to it. He points out that Scoot shot 35% from 3 before his ankle injury and goes deeper into his apparent shooting woes and essentially calls them overblown.

He also pointed out something concerning regarding Miller, that he only shot 39.5% at the rim in half court setting. He then goes through the history of similar wings and their finishing numbers and his are nearly unprecedentedly low.
Posted by PELsu
Member since Oct 2021
1708 posts
Posted on 6/13/23 at 6:39 am to
quote:

tankathon has him at 32.4% from 3 in 25 games. They might be including/excluding the showcase games the gleague does


Unfortunately, when it comes to Scoot(and any prospect really) you are going to have to deal with the masses making judgements from stat sheets and highlights and not really watching him play. And that includes a complete miss on how the g league works and sample size.

For those that are unaware, for no reason at all the G League separates their regular season stats from their showcase stats. You can get the combined stats, but that's not how they are most generally portrayed.

Scoot shot 27.5% from 3 during the regular season on only 2.7 a game and 19 games. For the showcase, he shot 47.1% from three on 2.8 a game, but again in only 6 games. Combined he shot 32.4% from three. And you are talking less than 3 a game and only 25 games. With that small of a sample size, if you heave a full court shot your numbers drop considerably. You need to look much further than trying to read his percentage.

Scoot is basically Zion in a PG's body. 6'2, 200 pounds of muscle, with the quickness and handle to get a step on ANY defender, the strength to hold them off and exceptional finishing ability. But even more than that, he likes to set others up as much as he likes to score. He's an offense and advantage maker all to himself. He was playing against grown men, professional players and he has been shooting from the NBA three point line, not college. He's also been running NBA type offenses and defenses.

Per 36 minutes in the G League, he scored 21 points, 7.8 assists and 6.1 rebounds. Take into account all your g league filters you want to, but that is the type of player we are discussing. He is a Ja Morant level player with a great work ethic and minus all the guns (as far as I know).

And while all rookies have their struggles no doubt, this is a guy that will be as ready to contribute from day one as any rookie can be.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20666 posts
Posted on 6/13/23 at 7:03 am to
quote:

Look this trade can only happen if either BI or Zion are included. The writing is on the wall... BI at game 5 with Herb and Willie all but confirms that the trade would be for Zion.

No team would value Zion more than Charlotte. Zion went to Duke, he is from South Carolina...he is a Jordan brand client. Jordan wants to sell the team and Zion would instantly increase the teams perception/ value.


BI grew up in North Carolina, so this would also be a homecoming for him.

That's why these discussions make sense. Most NBA stars do not want to go to Charlotte. But because of hometown ties, Charlotte likely feels that they (a small market team that has had little success) would have a chance to keep either one of our stars for the long term.
Posted by ThePistol
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1805 posts
Posted on 6/13/23 at 7:08 am to
quote:

The writing is on the wall... BI at game 5 with Herb and Willie all but confirms that the trade would be for Zion.


I don't think this means anything. BI will be looking at a HUGE contract beginning two years from now. I know everyone here loves him, but what has he shown on the court to want to pay him that kind of money? He is a one time all-star and has never been in the All NBA discussion. This is for a few reasons. First is health, he just simply doesn't play in enough games. Second, he doesn't impact games or winning at a high enough level night to night. He has had stretches where he has but he simply hasn't done it enough. Where does a 28 year old BI making over 45 million with a young Scoot get you?

Zion on the other hand is under contract for five years beginning this year. He has impacted winning in his few stretches where he has played, especially last season. He has shown transcendent talent. He is multiple years younger than BI and his game matches up better with Scoot.

BI is a very good player who can be the second option on a very good team. But he is the one that has to be included if the team goes in this direction.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 49
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 49Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram