Started By
Message

re: Pels covet Nate Ament in top 10 of draft

Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:21 pm to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11437 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

You got to play to be called a player!!! But, never mind that, when he does participate, he DOES NOT make this team better. Just this year he graced us with his presence 62 times and we were rewarded with just 26 wins (on a team that wasn't trying to tank).


Zion played in 62 games. The team went 22-40 with him playing, He had a +/- of -89.

Murphy played in 66 games. The team went 22-44 with him playing. He had a +/- of -169.

So, why doesn't Murphy get the same level of criticism?
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 4:01 am
Posted by iykyk985
Member since Dec 2025
249 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

So, why doesn't Murphy get the same level of criticism?


Though still limited, Murphy has more game than # 1.

Who would you like on the free throw line with the game in the balance? Who would you like taking that last minute three to win a game? Did you notice how Borrego started benching # 1 last year defensively late in close games? Did you realize that 3M3 was a better defensive rebounder as your 3 and D guy than your so-called superstar as a Power Forward?

But most importantly:

Since their arrivals in New Orleans, who's game has shown more improvement; 3M3 or # 1?

Funny how there seems to be a vibrant market for 3M3 and no interest at all in # 1. Perhaps other NBA front offices don't see what you see, huh?

DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!!
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
13153 posts
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

DMV area…. Shocker.


Made me throw up a little. We’re not even objectively evaluating players anymore. Just some delusional opinion that DMV is superior to all.
Posted by Pelicans15
Bossier
Member since Mar 2019
993 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:09 am to
saying all that just to say the team still went 22-44 and he was -169
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 8:10 am
Posted by iykyk985
Member since Dec 2025
249 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:27 am to
quote:


saying all that just to say the team still went 22-44 and he was -169


# 1 Stans amuse me. They can't seem to find their noses on their own faces.

... Who do you want at the free throw line in clutch situations?
... If you need a three, who do you want shooting it?
... Why does a coach fighting for a job take out team's 'superstar' defensively in close games down the stretch?
... Why can't our 'superstar' power forward rebound defensively?
... Who's game has shown more improvement since their arrival in NOLA?
... Who do other NBA GMs covet, Trey Murphy III or our 'superstar', # 1?
... Doesn't market value mean anything?

Somehow, # 1's Kool-Aid drinking stans seem to overlook these obvious truths.

DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!!

Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56654 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:40 am to
quote:

So, why doesn't Murphy get the same level of criticism?
because no one sees Murphy as the #1 option on a team. He’s not even a second option on good teams. Zion has been paraded as the face of the franchise. We have attempted to build our team around him for 7 years yet we still suck and most of the time he can’t stay healthy. Even when he’s healthy the team still sucks. That’s why.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 9:40 am
Posted by Pelicans15
Bossier
Member since Mar 2019
993 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:36 am to
I'm not a Zion stan any more. I was yes. but I am over it, get him out of here. All I'm saying is Trey aint it either.
Posted by higgsBoson
Democratic Party
Member since Jan 2012
1616 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:52 am to
quote:

because no one sees Murphy as the #1 option on a team. He’s not even a second option on good teams. Zion has been paraded as the face of the franchise. We have attempted to build our team around him for 7 years yet we still suck and most of the time he can’t stay healthy. Even when he’s healthy the team still sucks. That’s why


Murphy will be best as the number three option on a championship team and he would be elite at that role. I could see growing into being a number 2, but I don’t see it. He is the perfect low usage elite role player. That’s why he’s so valuable. But for us when we don’t have a number one or number two yet Trey doesn’t make sense. It’s better to trade him and get assets to help us find a number one and two. Maybe we have them with Fears and Queen but their timelines don’t line up with Trey.

ETA: with the right number one Trey can grow into a really good number two as well. He would just need a very ball dominant player who can create for both of them. And in that setup he’d be a perfect number two. Golden State obviously would be great. Boston with Tatum also.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 10:56 am
Posted by iykyk985
Member since Dec 2025
249 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I'm not a Zion stan any more. I was yes. but I am over it, get him out of here. All I'm saying is Trey aint it either.



Conveniently, you failed to see what I said about 3M3:

"Though still limited, Murphy has more game than # 1."

...and yet you proceeded to argue with me by posting your analytical gobly-goop ignoring the facts I articulated.

Want more?

Trey, not # 1 led the team in scoring average this year.
Trey, not # 1 led the team in assists average this year.
Trey, not # 1, led the team in steals average this year.
-- and --
Trey averaged 4.8 defensive rebounds this year; # 1 averaged a horrible 3.7 defensive rebounds as a starting power forward..

DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!!



This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 11:34 am
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11437 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Doesn't market value mean anything?


All of this is valid. Murphy is a good player with promise. He's just not as talented as Zion, who is the most talented guy on our team.

I don't care if we trade him or not. But if he's here, he starts. You can't show me anybody on our roster that should play over him. No coach is brave enough to do it. The front office would revolt as well. 40M guys aren't bench players. They'd be better off cutting or waiving him before they do that..

quote:

Somehow, # 1's Kool-Aid drinking stans seem to overlook these obvious truths.


You can't take my crown as the Zion truther. I called out to trade him over 5 years ago and have been hammering him ever since. I'd love to move on. But I want us to benefit when we do, if we can. That's all I care about..
Posted by Pelicans15
Bossier
Member since Mar 2019
993 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:27 pm to
I don't understand what your post is. What are you trying to get across? Are you saying trey is the future? I understand you don't like Zion that's fine. But we were a bad team last year. There is a difference in putting up good numbers on a bad team and being a good player. Is trey willing to accept a 2nd or 3rd role? I doubt it. I feel like he wants to be number 1. Especially not to a rookie or 20 year old. He's not a winning player as proven in our record last year and the past years he's been here. Yes can get better. But unless he whole heartily accepts being the third option be gotta go.
Posted by Stamps74
Member since Nov 2017
1593 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:47 pm to
I understand if teams realize Pels trying trade into top 10, cause they are calling teams. What kind of clown show is it if teams know what player the Pels wanna draft.
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
13364 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:49 pm to
Kind of like how the Pelicans were trying to trade up for Ace Bailey last year. They kept the misdirection on Fears pretty well hidden last year.
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56654 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 3:27 pm to
Good point
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479170 posts
Posted on 6/21/26 at 6:53 am to
quote:

Kind of like how the Pelicans were trying to trade up for Ace Bailey last year. They kept the misdirection on Fears pretty well hidden last year.


Misdirection? Wasn't his availability at 7 shocking to the front office, which is what caused their panic trade to get Queen (who they would have picked at 7)?

I just don't see how you're trying to relate the possible attempt to trade up for Bailey with Fears. Bailey was too expensive to acquire, in that scenario and we never had a shot to draft him in the first place. We also didn't anticipate having a shot at Fears where we picked.
Posted by SenGooner
Member since Feb 2026
141 posts
Posted on 6/21/26 at 7:11 am to
Trey Murphy has outperformed his draft position and become a role player on a team that can win a championship. Dude averaged 10 points a game in college. Zion was supposed to be the next MJ. Instead, he sucks. He's the seafood gumbo hentai porn addict version of Collin Sexton with 1/10th of the heart of Sexton.

The NBA actually views Trey as a positive trade asset. The NBA views Zion as a piece of shite with negative value.
This post was edited on 6/21/26 at 7:13 am
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
13364 posts
Posted on 6/21/26 at 10:44 am to
The trade up speculation might have been true but it was never for Bailey. That was a big misdirection for months. We had a giant hole at the PG position at the time. It was always an attempt to get Fears.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6608 posts
Posted on 6/21/26 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Made me throw up a little. We’re not even objectively evaluating players anymore. Just some delusional opinion that DMV is superior to all.

That's not fair. They did their due diligence with a Queen evaluation and Bey was a huge hit. Peavy is TBD and Hawk even looked like an actual NBA player towards the end of season. Excluding the last game.

I don't see why it's a problem until it backfires,
Its not like we've had great luck elsewhere.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13794 posts
Posted on 6/21/26 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

That's not fair. They did their due diligence with a Queen evaluation and Bey was a huge hit. Peavy is TBD and Hawk even looked like an actual NBA player towards the end of season. Excluding the last game.

I don't see why it's a problem until it backfires,
Its not like we've had great luck elsewhere.
Queen is a DMV who is friends with Weaver's son. Bey has the Weaver history as well. Hawkins has almost never looked like anything more than an end of the bench player or G League player. Peavy is a TBD.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6608 posts
Posted on 6/22/26 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Queen is a DMV who is friends with Weaver's son. Bey has the Weaver history as well. Hawkins has almost never looked like anything more than an end of the bench player or G League player. Peavy is a TBD.

What does Queen being friends with Weaver's son and a Bey history with Weaver have to do with properly evaluating talent?

They can have the connections and still be fairly evaluated.

Either y'all have to accpet that Queen/ Bey were indeed properly evaluated while dropping 40pts and hanging up trip dubs, or you accept that the Pelicans are indeed a lucky franchise.

We know one of those is complete bullshite so lets actually give the FO the benefit of doubt until proven otherwise.



first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram