
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelicans will never get a needed FA on the buyout market huh?
Posted on 2/19/23 at 8:15 pm to DallasTiger45
Posted on 2/19/23 at 8:15 pm to DallasTiger45
Ok, top 6
Point is they could’ve gotten themselves a top pick along with 8-10 additional 1st rounders from selling everything.
Bridges, Claxton, DFS going out could’ve gotten them a hell of a haul
Point is they could’ve gotten themselves a top pick along with 8-10 additional 1st rounders from selling everything.
Bridges, Claxton, DFS going out could’ve gotten them a hell of a haul
Posted on 2/19/23 at 8:25 pm to Soggymoss
The Nets are not falling off a cliff. They are a top 5 seed and should stay out of the playin. They have 5 of the best defenders in the league (Simmons, Bridges, O'Neale, DFS and Claxton). Plus the deepest bench in the league. I think they upset someone and make a run..
Posted on 2/19/23 at 8:27 pm to Soggymoss
I think they are trying to be decent and probably will be decent tbh
They are still a free agent destination due to market size, connection to Jay Z as well.
I don’t blame them for keeping Bridges and trying. If they can get rid of Ben Simmons contract or somehow rehabilitate his mind, they might actually be good sooner than anticipated.
They are still a free agent destination due to market size, connection to Jay Z as well.
I don’t blame them for keeping Bridges and trying. If they can get rid of Ben Simmons contract or somehow rehabilitate his mind, they might actually be good sooner than anticipated.
Posted on 2/19/23 at 9:27 pm to Dinky Mulberry
quote:
SOMEHOW, come out with my new favorite player on the rise...Mikal Bridges
nets turned down memphis .
offered 3 memphis #1s and a gsw #1 and a player.
admittedly the Memphis picks are probably in the 20s.
nets want him too.
its interesting to me how #1s got devalued in the gobert deal.
This post was edited on 2/19/23 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 2/19/23 at 9:34 pm to Honest Man
If Zion was healthy, then maybe we'd have gone all-in at the deadline and in this buyout market
Posted on 2/19/23 at 9:49 pm to Dinky Mulberry
quote:
Pretty much in the dark on how things work (trade-wise)...but if I was pulling the strings and there was ANY way possible...I woulda forced my way right into the middle of that Nets/Suns deal...and SOMEHOW, come out with my new favorite player on the rise...Mikal Bridges (with Claxton thrown in).
Are you ever going to shut the fucck up about this?
Everyone on here likes and wanted bridges and claxton.
Brooklyn wanted to keep bridges. He was the centerpiece of the trade.
Posted on 2/19/23 at 10:11 pm to saintsfan92612
quote:
Zion was healthy, then maybe we'd have gone all-in at the deadline and in this buyout market
accidentally dv.
you nailed it.
theres no sense in paying premium prices at deadline as if one guy will set us for the championship run.
Posted on 2/20/23 at 8:25 am to Honest Man
quote:
We need length and rebounding.
We're 8th in rebounding.
We needed shooting. Biggest concern going forward by far
Posted on 2/20/23 at 8:37 am to Soggymoss
quote:Make it 12 ish at worst, and you're on point.
Ok, top 6
Posted on 2/20/23 at 9:31 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
We needed shooting. Biggest concern going forward by far
Shooting definitely a huge concern; consistently better on-ball defense is absolutely needed we take too many quarters/games off.
Posted on 2/20/23 at 11:46 am to Macintosh
quote:
If we were competing for rings maybe. We aren’t there yet
And never will as long as Zion and Ingram are our main pieces
Posted on 2/20/23 at 9:31 pm to Honest Man
I could be wrong but I thought history shows buyout players rarely contribute to rings

Popular
Back to top

3







