Started By
Message
locked post

JMO...I don't think the Pels need a rim-protecting "5" in today's NBA. The BIG low post 5s

Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:14 pm
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2358 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:14 pm
---are a dying breed & like Nance said in his interview today, he doesn't really need to call for help to double team & help him guard ANY of today's 5s...other than the two who EVERYBODY needs help when guarding.

---I think the Pels prefer to have a smaller 5 who can step out & switch on defense...and concentrate on NOT letting opponents get to the rim instead of having a rim-protector just sitting back there. A rim-protector nearly always comes with a downside of cloggin' up the inside on offense (bad for Zion) and/or an inability to step out on defense (bad for the Pels)...old-school 5s are dinosaurs...get ahead of the curve on this one. Go small. (Sorry Val, nothing personal...strictly business)
This post was edited on 10/2/23 at 8:22 pm
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6528 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:22 pm to
Yes we prefer a smaller center that is not a true rim protector. This has been the long term plan the whole time.
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2358 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

Yes we prefer a smaller center that is not a true rim protector. This has been the long term plan the whole time.


I hate to say it...but if Nance got nicked up & couldn't go...I think Willie would close with Zeller instead of Val, unless he wanted to go REALLY small and leave both of them on the bench at crunch time.
Posted by Pistol44
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2019
2305 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:34 pm to
For sure, but rim protection is not just being a ball-swatter. Rim protection can be had with a big body preventing player's from having a direct path to the basket, which Val is good at and Larry not so much. Larry on the other hand is good at guarding on the perimeter where we know Val struggles. Ideally, you'd like those skills (perimeter defense and rim protection) on the court at the same time but with the Pels its one or the other due to spacing.

Pels really need Zion and BI to become good two-way players.
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
11287 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:34 pm to
Disagree think we don't play good enough perimeter defense to not have shot blocker. I do agree that Val can't do it on defense I would be happy with him splitting time with a shot blocker
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
27586 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:40 pm to
Our best shot at a title is Zion at the 5

Final form pels that need offense

CJ
Ingram
Herb
Trey
Zion

5 dudes that can run. That's it. That's all this really comes down to. If that 5 can play a little defense and figure out how to rebound that 5 is NBA Finals ready
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2358 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Our best shot at a title is Zion at the 5

Final form pels that need offense

CJ
Ingram
Herb
Trey
Zion

5 dudes that can run. That's it. That's all this really comes down to. If that 5 can play a little defense and figure out how to rebound that 5 is NBA Finals ready


I agree...but that's a tough "sell" around here. BTW: By the end of this coming season, hopefully Dyson will advance to where he can replace CJ at crunch time.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
27586 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

hopefully Dyson will advance to where he can replace CJ at crunch time.


He'd have to magically become a 38% 3 pt shooter that can get his own shot.

There's no way CJ is on the bench in crunch time. He's too valuable offensively. We have 2 guys that are 3 level scorers that can get their own bucket. CJ is one of them.
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2358 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

He'd have to magically become a 38% 3 pt shooter that can get his own shot.

There's no way CJ is on the bench in crunch time. He's too valuable offensively. We have 2 guys that are 3 level scorers that can get their own bucket. CJ is one of them.


Yeah...you're probably right but I just think DD AND Herb are eventually becoming 36-38% 3-pt shooters. A man can dream can't he?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112894 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

BTW: By the end of this coming season, hopefully Dyson will advance to where he can replace CJ at crunch time.
There is quite literally 0% chance that happens. None.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 10/2/23 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

we don't play good enough perimeter defense to not have shot blocker.

The Pels allowed the fifth fewest attempts at the rim last year.
Posted by urtoosmall
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
549 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 6:08 am to
quote:

The Pels allowed the fifth fewest attempts at the rim last year.


Is there a stat for uncontested dunks / layups at the rim? I have to imagine that number is high for the Pels.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 8:26 am to
The Pels had a really good defense last year. Why are y’all acting like they sucked?
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2358 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 10:13 am to
quote:

quote:
we don't play good enough perimeter defense to not have shot blocker.

The Pels allowed the fifth fewest attempts at the rim last year.


Yep...We are structured to prevent the opponent from getting all the way to the rim, at the expense of NOT being very good rim-protectors when/if the opponent DOES get to the rim. (Nance is a good example)

As you said...this allows us to be much more effective on perimeter defense. BTW...we led the NBA in 3-pt % defense this past season. This is just another reason why the improvement of Daniels is SO important to the future of the Pels. Our defense could very easily become "elite"...if DD starts to play like I think he will.
This post was edited on 10/3/23 at 10:16 am
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27900 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 10:22 am to
Am I taking crazy pills? Why do people think we weren’t good on D last year?

This isn’t the fake Monty good at defense teams that allowed lower points per game because they played deliberately slow. They had the fifth or sixth best defensive rating in the entire league last year.
Posted by Dinky Mulberry
Member since Aug 2021
2358 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Am I taking crazy pills? Why do people think we weren’t good on D last year?

This isn’t the fake Monty good at defense teams that allowed lower points per game because they played deliberately slow. They had the fifth or sixth best defensive rating in the entire league last year.


I think one reason our D is underrated is because...on paper, our team just "looks" like it should be lousy on defense. We have several players that are rightfully considered to be "below average" on D. But we also have a coupla key players on D that can "cover", at least to a point, for those weak links. Rest assured, Willie knows what is going on out there on the defensive end.

This season, our D might be a bit stressed...with hopefully added minutes by Zion & BI...which is another reason I keep harping on DD being SO important for this coming year.
This post was edited on 10/3/23 at 10:54 am
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42421 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Final form pels that need offense

CJ
Ingram
Herb
Trey
Zion


Inject this lineup into my veins.

quote:

figure out how to rebound


There's your issue. They'd outscore almost anybody but man the amount of rebounds and second chance points the other team gets would make you pull your hair out. At least if you're keeping that lineup for extended minutes.
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
8459 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 5:57 pm to
I will again ask the question that no one who posits losing Valanciunas answers. If we replace Val with a small ball 5, who is going to rebound the basketball?

We’re already somewhere between the middle of the pack to bad at rebounding and that’s with Val, who averaged 14.7 per 36 last year
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
27586 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

who is going to rebound the basketball?


Its gonna have to be Zion as the primary so he can start the break. He got better and better right before the hammy last year.
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
13308 posts
Posted on 10/3/23 at 6:17 pm to
These lineups won't work if they don't improve their rebounding by a good bit. We've lost plenty of games last several seasons in this era because we couldn't rebound the ball effectively and the opposing teams kept getting second chances opportunities especially towards the end of games.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram