Started By
Message

How To Structure Boogie's Contract

Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:10 pm
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:10 pm
This is based on some of my own thoughts and a little bit based on what I hear they are discussing. Basically, they want to accomplish a few things. They would like to stay under the tax or barely go over it. And they also want to incentivize Boogie to play next year. Not just pay him to rehab. So, here is how you do the deal.

First, let me explain likely and unlikely incentives to you. Why? Because unlikely incentives can only count for 15% of the salary. What makes an incentive likely? Quite simply... They just look at last year and see if the guy did it last year. If he did, it's likely. If not, unlikely. With very few exceptions. So, with that said, the Pels could load the contracts with incentives, as long as Boogie did it last year. If he takes forever to recover, they don't pay him the incentives and don't go that far into the tax, if at all. But if he comes back, and plays a decent portion of the season, he gets close to his max.

Year 1:

20 Million Base

3 Million if he plays 48 games
3 Million if he plays 1700 minutes
2 Million if he scores 1200 points
2 Million if he grabs 600 rebounds

If he does all that, he is well worth the 30 million, and I would even allow him hitting all those bench marks to trigger an opt out of his contract if he hits 3 or 4. If he hits 2 or fewer, then year two is a team option with a similar structure
Posted by Aussie_Pelican
Melbourne
Member since Oct 2016
1195 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:28 pm to
He's going to LA
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:35 pm to
I disagree
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:44 pm to
The Lakers aren't going hard after Boogie. Pels aren't worried. He will return. It's just about figuring out the structure, incentives, options, etc
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115394 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:45 pm to
100% down with that structure.
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:50 pm to
These are all things they are discussing. They don't want to crush Boogie in negotiations. If he plays and plays well, give him his money and his freedom. But if he can't play for a while and/or plays poorly, then they should control the 2nd year. Its only fair.
Posted by LesGeaux45
Member since Nov 2009
9232 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:51 pm to
Yeah I think a structure like that works because as you stated, if he meets all those incentives it means he's way ahead of schedule on the rehab and is worth every penny.
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
12719 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:51 pm to
If that KCP deal is any indication, it seems goodnight for a Boogie to Lakers deal. Also, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Noel go there on a 1 year deal to look like a rock star next to LBJ and get some of that money back he stupidly turned down.
Posted by Aussie_Pelican
Melbourne
Member since Oct 2016
1195 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 7:59 pm to
We are fricked anyway. The East just became shite again and the West is stronger than its ever been. Pels with Boogie for 1/3 of the season doesn't give me confidence that this team improves on last season.

Oh well atleast Toronto can be happy!!
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:00 pm to
48 games means he is back by December and also sits out back to backs. That is actually pretty realistic IMO. It has become an 8-9 month injury. Wes Matthews had surgery in mid March and played on October 23rd. Just a tad over 7 months. Rudy Gay was playing LESS THAN 7 months after his surgery

Yeah, Boogie is bigger, but that shouldn't effect rehab by 4 or 5 months. I have always seen late October/early to mid November as the target
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115394 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:03 pm to
You have to walk a fine line here. You have to protect the team but you also want a player to be rewarded for rehabbing and playing great. I like it.
Posted by SulphursFinest
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
8719 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:07 pm to
Wish we could bag Kawhi and ditch Boogie.
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:11 pm to
Why not wish for Michael Jordan in his prime to come to the Pels in a time machine and sign for the minimum?

I mean, if we are wishing for the unrealistic....
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:13 pm to
Seems like a very fair deal for the Pels, and it certainly gives Boogie what he deserves. But I'm certain the way Boogie's camp would spin it like "Boogie is a max deal player, and he's already proved that." Not to mention to a lay man it'll look like a $20 mil contract and Boogie may not want the perception even though its not really a $20 mil contract.

Now that LeBron is in LA, what makes you think the Lakers won't push their chips in for Boogie on a one-year max? I mean what have they got to lose with LeBron on a 4-yr deal and Boogie coming off the books next summer? Add that to the fact that Boogie taking a one-yr max tells everyone in the league that regardless of injury, he won't de-value himself

EDIT: saw your explanation of the Lakers cap situation in the other thread. no need to re-explain here
This post was edited on 7/1/18 at 8:15 pm
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
5727 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:14 pm to
Lakers don't have the capital for a one-year max for Boogie...even in trading Deng and renouncing Randle...
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:16 pm to
The Lakers were never really interested in Boogie. They tried to sell him on a bargain basement deal. 1 year 12-15 mil. It was a joke. But Boogie's people, correctly, tried to use it as leverage.

The deal could get reported however the Pels and Boogie's people want. When Jrue's deal was first reported, it was with the unlikely incentives. No reason that it can't be reported as 2/60, even though only 20 would be guaranteed, technically
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:19 pm to
so how does that work with the cap?

at the end of the season, we see which incentives he reached and that's what counts against towards the luxury tax?

if thats the case wouldnt it be beneficial to announce it as a $20 mil deal in order to use the full MLE now and try to shed Ajinca or Solo at the deadline?
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
5727 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:22 pm to
Correct me if I am wrong, Crewz, but likely incentives are typically captured in the cap but the unlikely generally are not unless you meet them, yes?
This post was edited on 7/1/18 at 8:22 pm
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:23 pm to
It doesn't matter what is announced. That is all for casual fans. It probably boxes you in to the tax payer exception and the BAE instead of the MLE, but thats fine.

Then, it all gets totaled up after the season and the tax bill comes. Or, it doesn't if he doesn't reach any and you dump Ajinca
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 7/1/18 at 8:27 pm to
got it thanks for the clarification & the info you've passed along



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram