Started By
Message

re: Haliburton goes down screaming in pain

Posted on 6/22/25 at 8:56 pm to
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
6199 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Once it’s done it’s done. Teams don’t undo it. They just live with it.



Well, except for the Lakers
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25889 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Perhaps waiting until after the series is over to trade a future pick…


We should always wait to trade a pick because the teams star player may pop his Achilles.

Wait wait wait he could also do it during the offseason during a pickup game so so don't do it then either.

In fact never trade any pick ever.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7775 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:06 pm to
We have about 7 examples of calf injuries leading to Achilles ruptures now

It was a reckless trade
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25889 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:15 pm to
The Pacers pick isn't going to end up in the lottery. Even with Halliburton healthy he wasn't the best player on the team for a lot of this series, and they have a great head coach.

They'll be a 6 or 7 seed next year in a weak east conference. It's not as big of a deal as some of yall are making it out to be.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Players are going to stop playing with calf strains.
Not in game 7 of the NBA Finals.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

We should always wait to trade a pick because the teams star player may pop his Achilles.

Wait wait wait he could also do it during the offseason during a pickup game so so don't do it then either.

In fact never trade any pick ever.
I mean, it was discussed quite a bit when Haliburton was first injured, that an Achilles is the #1 risk for playing through that specific injury.

Meaning, his injury tonight was 100% not a fluke injury that came out of nowhere.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

They'll be a 6 or 7 seed next year in a weak east conference. It's not as big of a deal as some of yall are making it out to be.
That'll equate to somewhere around the 15th pick.

Not sure how going from the 15th pick to 23rd instead of waiting 5 days for an injury that we knew was a risk is considered not a big deal
Posted by Mad Scientist26
Member since Jul 2018
2268 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 11:16 pm to
Man NBA players are never gonna play in the regular season after this.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13813 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 12:01 am to
quote:

Yes me


No actually Soggy called it…..

quote:

Ehhh, the way our luck goes Halliburton is gonna blow his Achilles out in their next game, be out all next season and they will have the 1st pick
Posted by nicj4
Guadeloupe
Member since Jan 2020
764 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 2:27 am to
Not in PO (Damian Lillard and Jayson Tatum)
Posted by nicj4
Guadeloupe
Member since Jan 2020
764 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 2:33 am to
I want to say , use the bench players more often in season.
A team can have 15+ players i remember.
Really use the 15 players. Coaches like Thibodeau don’t have to exist.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17367 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 5:28 am to
I called it in the trade thread..
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25889 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 5:37 am to
quote:

Not sure how going from the 15th pick to 23rd instead of waiting 5 days for an injury that we knew was a risk is considered not a big deal


Because there's not a historically big difference between the 15th and 23rd pick hitting.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
5830 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 9:02 am to
quote:

That'll equate to somewhere around the 15th pick.

Not sure how going from the 15th pick to 23rd


I think that pick ends up anywhere from #15-#22. A lineup of Nembhard/ Mathurin/ Nesmith/ Siakam/ Turner + McConnell/ Toppin/ Sheppard bench is still one of the more complete rosters in the East and has a chance at top 4/5.

1. This is a loaded draft with several players we may like that we think can impact this team now.

2. There could be a player that we'd draft at #15 that falls to us at #23 which would make this argument irrelevant.

3. If we get a player that has starter potential then it may give us options to move Herb/ Murray/ CJ and look at upgrades.

Its not that big of a deal and I'd still probably rather have #23 now while knowing the implications above.
This post was edited on 6/23/25 at 9:03 am
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13813 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Because there's not a historically big difference between the 15th and 23rd pick hitting.


Sengun/Trey Murphy went 16 and 17in ‘21
Usman Garuba went 23 that year.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25889 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Sengun/Trey Murphy went 16 and 17in ‘21
Usman Garuba went 23 that year.


And jokic went 41st.

We can do this all day. Look it up by win shares/number of All star selections, etc. Its pretty much a crap shoot after the top 3 picks
Posted by Balsamic_duck
Member since Jun 2017
4332 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 1:45 pm to
This trade basically put a target on Dumars’ back to all other GMs. Just an incredibly low IQ trade that was pointed out on message boards at the time. Every GM now knows you can pull a fast one on ole Joe.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17367 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

I think that pick ends up anywhere from #15-#22

Knicks
Boston
Miami
Philly
Cleveland
Detroit
Milwaukee
Atlanta
Orlando


All those teams are better than Indiana without Haliburton.

Indy will make the play in, they won’t win it to make the playoffs though.

That pick will be 10-14 at worst for them, and as far as trade value goes for us it would have skyrocketed after that injury
This post was edited on 6/23/25 at 5:56 pm
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13813 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

We can do this all day. Look it up by win shares/number of All star selections, etc. Its pretty much a crap shoot after the top 3 picks


Doesn’t matter, that’s just stupid saying a pick that’s almost ten picks higher is the same. I’d want the choice, how many years have the Pels had players snatched in front of them. Lillard, Haliburton, Sengun, etc.

If anything pass top 3 doesn’t matter, guess there’s no difference between 7 and 15 right?
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25889 posts
Posted on 6/23/25 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

that’s just stupid saying a pick that’s almost ten picks higher is the same.


What's stupid is ignoring data.

Specifically pick 15 or pick 25. Not just "ten picks higher" there is plenty of data that shows the NBA draft is pretty much a crap shoot outside of the top 5 picks.

Of course 1 is better than 10, 2 is better than 12th.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram