Started By
Message

re: Griff: BI is "mechanically incapable" of being traded under the new CBA rules

Posted on 7/17/24 at 2:06 pm to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31408 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

IMO, if Brown demanded a trade and Celtics dangled him, there would be a bidding war, even with that contract.



Gotta disagree...he is entering his 5/285mil contract (57mil avg) which is the 2nd highest AAV in the league to only Tatum.

He was Finals MVP, but that team was built so damn well these past 2 years everyone is envious. He put up 20/5/5 and shot 44/24/73 with one game only scoring 10 points. He's not an elite player in the mold of SGA, Luka, or Jokic.

I think there's a market, but those numbers are beyond insane. Which is why paying Ingram 50mil+ is a mistake like Washington had made with Beal.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450394 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 4:56 pm to
If Brown is your #1, you're likely not making the playoffs in the West. Maybe the play in if you've got a solid 2/3
This post was edited on 7/17/24 at 5:00 pm
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10750 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Brown is your #1, you're likely not making the playoffs in the West. Maybe the play in if you've got a solid 2/3


This is an odd stance. Brown is more accomplished and well-rounded than Zion, who we are pinning all of our hopes. By any measure they are on the same level. Yet Brown has little chance of leading a team to the playoffs? That doesn't make sense.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35185 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

This is an odd stance. Brown is more accomplished and well-rounded than Zion, who we are pinning all of our hopes. By any measure they are on the same level. Yet Brown has little chance of leading a team to the playoffs? That doesn't make sense.

C’mon man, anyone with two eyes can see that Zion is a more talented player than Brown. Now, does he have limitations due to injuries, of course. But if you were promised health on both players, the vast majority of GMs would choose Zion.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10750 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

the vast majority of GMs would choose Zion.


It's an interesting debate. Do you believe the Celtics would take Zion straight up for Brown?


Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35185 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

It's an interesting debate. Do you believe the Celtics would take Zion straight up for Brown?

At this point? Probably not, but they already won with Brown. I was referring to a hypothetical world where injuries aren’t an issue. Brown has that over Zion, but overall Brown is not a “special” player. He’s good, he’s not a number 1.

A ceiling for a player like Brown is Paul George.
Posted by Pistol44
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2019
2223 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 8:24 pm to
If you poll coaches, availability trumps talent. This is a big reason for BI’s predicament. Zion is even less available, while Tatum and Brown who I view as lesser combined talents than Husky and Slim are workhorses.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35185 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 8:54 pm to
I know it sounds stupid, but the top end talent of Boston’s roster wasn’t impressive.
This post was edited on 7/17/24 at 8:54 pm
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10750 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 8:59 pm to
The fun part about this discussion is I've gone and looked at Zion vs Brown's stats (for this past.season), and they are eerily similar. They are almost identical, except a couple small differences. I had no idea..
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
19940 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 6:49 am to
quote:

the top end talent of Boston’s roster wasn’t impressive.


It's true. This was the first title in a very long time that didn't feature someone who was arguably a top-5 player.

Tatum is somewhere #8-15. Brown and Porzingis are somewhere in the #25-40 range. Jrue and White are somewhere in the #50-75 area.

The Celtics won as a team, not as a couple of stars surrounding by supporting pieces.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10750 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Tatum is somewhere #8-15. Brown and Porzingis are somewhere in the #25-40 range. Jrue and White are somewhere in the #50-75 area.


It's a loaded team. 5 players that are legit top 50ish. That's crazy balance and what every team should thrive to accomplish.

Small quibble. I'd go Tatum top 10. Brown top 20. Holiday and White top 50. I think Porzingis is a borderline top 50 guy, probably more like top 75 or so.

Also, their bench doesn't get the praise it deserves. Very functional with smart role players. It's just super smart roster construction.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450394 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 7:44 am to
I think y'all are underrating Tatum.

Moving him from 5-10 puts him behind guys like

Old Durant
Old Curry
Ant Edwards
Ant Davis

I don't think you can honestly argue these 4 are better than Tatum today

Then you have Embiid. Meh. Too hurt and is worse at the only thing people criticize Tatum for ("disappearing in the playoffs")
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35185 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:30 am to
quote:

I don't think you can honestly argue these 4 are better than Tatum today

I think he's in the same tier with Ant, Toni, Booker

IMO he's definitely behind:

Jokic
Luka
Giannis
SGA
Curry
Durant

It's hard to judge players like Embiid who are also better than Tatum in a vacuum where injuries don't exist, but he always finds a way to get hurt.

Brown is massively overrated right now. The Ringer has him ranked 15th which is hilarious even for a website owned by a Boston Homer. Same with having White and Jrue ranked in the 30's, c'mon

ETA: Curry and Durant are old and can fall off at any time, but IMO last season they were better than Tatum.
This post was edited on 7/18/24 at 8:33 am
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
4945 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:36 am to
Jokic
Doncic
SGA
Giannis
ANT
Tatum
Haliburton
Victor
Embid
Sabonis
AD
Booker

Steph
KD

Zion
Maxey
Mitchell
Brunson
Kyrie
Brown
Young
Fox
KAT
Bridges
Siakam
Sengun
Chet
Banchero
PG
Jamal Murray
Dejante Murray
Bam
JJJ
Gobert
Butler
Dame
Kawhi

Rough top 37 in order if they did a redraft today. Opinions?
This post was edited on 7/18/24 at 8:54 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450394 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Curry
Durant

Why? Especially Durant. Look at their stats and remember Tatum is a LOT better on D than either of them.

quote:

Brown is massively overrated right now.

I agree with this. That's why I said he's a scaled BI. Better than BI but a lot more expensive to account for that.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450394 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Opinions?

Sabonis is way too high

I don't see how you can put Ant over Tatum today. I know he's got the buzz, but Tatum is probably better at literally everything. In an actual draft, Ant would go before him b/c of age, not play.

And if you're doing a pure redraft rankings, Wemby is probably a safe #1 and Durant is waaaay lower.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35185 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Why? Especially Durant. Look at their stats and remember Tatum is a LOT better on D than either of them.

I just trust them both more than Tatum. If you swap Tatum with either of them on that Boston team, they still win the title.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
4945 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Sabonis is way too high

I don't see how you can put Ant over Tatum today. I know he's got the buzz, but Tatum is probably better at literally everything. In an actual draft, Ant would go before him b/c of age, not play.

And if you're doing a pure redraft rankings, Wemby is probably a safe #1 and Durant is waaaay lower.


Sabonis was my wild card honestly. Dude pretty much averages a triple double. I think he deserves to be up there if we are talking re draft and Embid/ AD are in similar spots.

The ANT vs Tatum is 100% future based on this redraft. But Tatum has the edge now of course.

Durant I don't necessarily disagree but will teams pass him up for Brunson, Mitchell, etch? It is why I kinda made a separate spot for Steph/ KD and excluded Lebron.

Will teams pick Wemby over the guys in front of him? I slid him over but there's an argument for every guy in front of him.
This post was edited on 7/18/24 at 8:52 am
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35185 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:48 am to
I'm going to pretend that this re-draft is only for next season, because if it's just going forward it will be completely skewed by age.

I'm a LeBron hater, but I think he'd go in the top 37

Sabonis is way too high.

Maxey is way too high.

Brown is too high.

Banchero is too low.

Bridges is way too high.

Kawhi is too low.

Butler is too low.

Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
4945 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Sabonis is way too high.

Maxey is way too high.
Brown is too high.
Banchero is too low.
Bridges is way too high.
Kawhi is too low.
Butler is too low.


Who would you put behind Butler/ Kawhi/ Banchero?

Who would you put in front of Maxey/ Brown/ Bridges/ Sabonis?

I slid Wemby/ Maxey because I agree after looking at it. I don't see much more movement.

Obviously there's (3) outliers in Steph/ KD/ Lebron and they skew whichever top group you pick
This post was edited on 7/18/24 at 9:00 am
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram