- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daniels, how fricking great is this?
Posted on 12/3/22 at 7:42 am to brmark70816
Posted on 12/3/22 at 7:42 am to brmark70816
+/- stat is over rated sometimes. CJ had a terrible game, maybe his worst of the season and was +14.
0
Posted on 12/3/22 at 9:31 am to touchdownjeebus
All I heard was his offense needed help but I'm super impressed
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:17 am to beachtiger777
He will get better offensively. With exception to Simmons, virtually every NBA player does. The thing is though, his shot is not bad. It’s a bit slow but it’s not bad, and he can get to the cup and finish. I would like to see him be a bit stronger at the rim, but he still has the body of a kid.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:18 am to touchdownjeebus
ROY +50000 let’s ride
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:26 am to brmark70816
+/- on a one game sample is worthless
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:30 am to smokymountainrain
quote:
+/- on a one game sample is worthless
I was going to post the same thing. I like it over the course of a season and comparing it to the rest of the team but yeah, definitely need a large sample size for it to be worthwhile.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:40 am to touchdownjeebus
and he’s smart AF. Dudes basketball IQ on O and D is thru the roof.
He’s about to take a 3 sometimes with the clock winding down and he’ll see a better shooter than him and gets it to them with just enough time. The awareness is amazing.
He’s about to take a 3 sometimes with the clock winding down and he’ll see a better shooter than him and gets it to them with just enough time. The awareness is amazing.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 12:05 pm to smokymountainrain
quote:
+/- on a one game sample is worthless
I agree. This thread was made in praise of last night.
32 minutes on the court, the team was outscored by 10.
16 minutes off the court, we outscored them by 28.
To single him out and praise him, given those circumstances is odd..
Posted on 12/3/22 at 12:32 pm to brmark70816
quote:If you ageee6that it's worthless then why is it odd to praise him given that's worthless circumstance?
To single him out and praise him, given those circumstances is odd
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 12/3/22 at 12:36 pm to brmark70816
Dyson was +9 with the “starters”
2Q went in favor of spurs, everyone was minus for the most part
2Q +/-
Dyson -11
CJ - 10
Murphy -7
Zion - 7
Nance -11
Another -4 in the waning minutes of the game with the scrubs closing it out
2Q went in favor of spurs, everyone was minus for the most part
2Q +/-
Dyson -11
CJ - 10
Murphy -7
Zion - 7
Nance -11
Another -4 in the waning minutes of the game with the scrubs closing it out
Posted on 12/3/22 at 2:08 pm to brmark70816
quote:
o single him out and praise him, given those circumstances is odd..
Did you watch the game? He was like a fricking brick wall.
You suck in general and specifically all at the same time.
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 12/3/22 at 9:11 pm to touchdownjeebus
I like that he’s a big guard, CJ, Jose, DG are not.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:06 pm to GoodOne
Dyson was a professional last year so it's not really a huge transition for him
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:41 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Most people that knew about him before the draft knew he woukd be the 2nd best defender on the team by the time the season started.
Stop lol
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:57 pm to brmark70816
quote:
All this praise is for last night's game?
I didn't watch it all yet. Was he really that good? The box score doesn't reflect that at all..
The box score won't reflect Dyson cutting off a driver and making him pass..or putting up a hand and altering a shot into a miss (that unfortunately got a rebound-put-back by the Spurs)... or playing help defense that results in a turnover credited to the other Pel defender. The dude makes his presence felt, even if it doesn't qualify as a measurable stat.
He also doesn't get extra points for what Sean Elliott called a "world class" layup that he made so effortlessly and as elegant as a Mikhail Baryshnikov Grand Jete.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 12:28 am to TackySweater
quote:
Most people that knew about him before the draft knew he woukd be the 2nd best defender on the team by the time the season started.
Stop lol
6 pages of draft day posters comparing Dyson’s defense to Herb Jones
Posted on 12/4/22 at 5:35 am to LSUFreek
Wow Danman going full douche in that thread. Fox trolling per usual.
Yeah everyone was pumped about this guy from the get go. His offense looks better than projected which is scary.
Yeah everyone was pumped about this guy from the get go. His offense looks better than projected which is scary.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 9:58 am to armsdealer
quote:
Dyson, BI, Herb, Trey, Zion
Replace one of the “other 3” with Nance and that’s our best lineup, imo.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 10:02 am to MrJimBeam
I thought you were talking about me for a second lol. A lot of us 100% assumed Dyson would become our 2nd best defender and potentially better than Herb.
Dyson was a projected top 10 pick mainly for his defense and Herb was a projected 2nd round pick mainly for his defense. Just that shows you how high opposing teams thought about his future impact.
Dyson was a projected top 10 pick mainly for his defense and Herb was a projected 2nd round pick mainly for his defense. Just that shows you how high opposing teams thought about his future impact.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News