Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Could Murphy be dealt today?

Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:25 am
Posted by tigerbait3488
River Ridge
Member since Dec 2007
10439 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:25 am
I think he may get us the most in return with who is realistically available and we already have his replacement? I would hate to see him go because he is such a great team guy.
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
6549 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:27 am to
No
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17408 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:31 am to
I think trading Ingram is more likely than Murphy, and I don't think BI is going anywhere
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25371 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:35 am to
What?
You just want to trade someone to get a return?

What’s the point of that?
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61432 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:40 am to
quote:

What?
You just want to trade someone to get a return?

What’s the point of that?


Yeah, if they do a trade it will because it was a good value deal, like Murray and Okungwu for JV/filler/picks would be cheap. I don't see why Atlanta does that, but I have to think that's what Griff is angling for.
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8419 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

and we already have his replacement?


I want to push back on this, we do not have his replacement at all. Hawkins and Trey play different positions and play different games. The only thing in common is they’re both good shooters.
Posted by Louisianabound88
BR
Member since Dec 2016
3069 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:52 am to
If we trade what Trey can potentially be opposed to what BI is we’re dumb
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17769 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 8:38 am to
quote:

we already have his replacement


Do you really think that Hawk would have done well guarding PG13 last night?
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:25 am to
quote:

JV/filler/picks would be cheap


We have much different definitions of cheap. Jonas to Murray is a downgrade by every advanced metric.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30077 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:06 am to
I'm really conflicted about Dyson.

While his offense is a work in progress and peak might be Rubio, his defense has been downright elite. Who was on wemby to end the game? Dyson.

That's not the first time he's defended the best player in clutch situations.

But a big trade involving Murphy is gonna include Dyson imho their value combined is huge
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 10:08 am
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70688 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:08 am to
quote:

If we trade what Trey can potentially be opposed to what BI is we’re dumb


We need to stop thinking Trey is some heir apparent to BI.

They are the same size. Everything about their games are completely different.
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
3669 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:21 pm to
agree, I haven't seen much progress in Trey's overall game. A few head fakes but not much else. Desn't finish around the rim well.

If the consensus is that he could be close to a max player, i would deal him and hope Hawkins could fill in the perimeter shooting loss.

If you think you can get Trey long term at 25m, keep.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram