Started By
Message

re: Center Trade Options

Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:51 pm to
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
7153 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Giving away first round picks for old and/or average to below average centers in a year where our over/under is a hard 28.5 is how losers stay losers.

Yes, upgrading the worst position on your team that is the main cause of your struggles is how losers stay losers. And being a loser without trying to improve is how you become a winner!
quote:

There is far, FAR more evidence that our core will not be a playoff team than there is evidence we will suddenly flip the switch and win 40+ games

Really? Where is this data that can show the future impact of Queen/ Fears/ Missi along with the addition of Mathurin, Murray, and a true rim protector shooting 38% that can properly space?

Please show that data!

Have you ever thought maybe you are just being slightly pessimistic in your overall assessment?

Btw you've refused to acknowledge the entire scenario where it isn't a lottery pick and we end up with a Hayes/ Hawk draft pick. Crazy, its almost like you are avoiding that very logical point that would otherwise make the Turner move look great!
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 1:58 pm
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30867 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Yeah because if there's anything we learned the last few years its that having Dyson Daniels, Herb, and a shite center really helped against rim protection.



Dyson and Herb on the court together is really difficult to make work b/c of their terrible offense.


Look at 3 years ago
Top 4 lineups played
CJ/BI/Herb/Zion/JV 116.2 DRtg -1.1 Net
CJ/BI/Herb/Zion/Larry 110.9 DRtg -4.4 Net
CJ/Trey/Herb/Zion/JV 109.1 DRg 1.0 Net
CJ/BI/Herb/Trey/JV 96.4 DRtg +15.7 Net

Crazy how that one lineup without a certain lazy fatass is so good defensively. Crazy how the same thing was seen this past year too.

and the Dyson/Herb/BI/Zion/JV lineup was a +20.7 NetRtg with a 113.9 DRtg
Dyson/Herb/CJ/Trey/Zion had a 101.6 DRtg and a 16.3 Net




I've been saying it for like 5 years now, Zion has to suck it up and play the 5. His fat arse is big enough to body anyone in the league defensively, and when he can do this the mismatch on the offensive side is tremendous.
You see the lineup 3 years ago with Zion at the 5 being very successful, and you saw it this past year as well.




quote:

Yes, a cheap center is what we need haha.



Who's the center for the Celtics, the team that had the 2nd best rim protection in the league last year, and the best the year before? You probably can't even name their 5 last year, and the year before was the uber athletic rim protecting 55 year old Al Holford. You know why their rim protection is good? B/C THEY HAVE GREAT PERIMETER DEFENDERS.

We aren't trading for a Chet, or Wemby, or Gobert, or trotting out a Allen/Mobley front court. But Missi's stats are comparable with any good defensive 5 in the league. We don't need to waste money or assets on someone like Turner, or anyone else you listed b/c Missi is just as good or better than all of them. What we need is a backup 5, not a $30+ million dollar starting 5. You want to upgrade a position and give up assets and pay a high salary, then do it to a wing player.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
7153 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

What we need is a backup 5, not a $30+ million dollar starting 5. You want to upgrade a position and give up assets and pay a high salary, then do it to a wing player.

Your opinion is that we need a cheap center and a 3rd string wing?

You'd rather a wing get 10 min behind Trey/ Bey instead of getting a C who can play 20+ minutes, have Missi beasting off the bench, and not being fricked if either get hurt?
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30867 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Your opinion is that we need a cheap center and a 3rd string wing?



Yep.

a $30+M 3rd string wing.
your reading comprehension is just terrible.

quote:

You'd rather a wing get 10 min behind Trey/ Bey instead of getting a C who can play 20+ minutes, have Missi beasting off the bench, and not being fricked if either get hurt?



or, and let's use some common fricking sense here, i'd rather get an all-star caliber wing to play with Trey, while Bey comes off the bench.



Answer this question. What position will DQ primarily play in the NBA?
Are you bringing in a 5 that is taking minutes away from DQ at the 5? Is DQ going to primarily play the 4? if so, why the frick is Zion still on the team?
I don't know how many more stats i need to post for you, but Missi has been and is going to be an elite defensive 5. What we need is a 5 that compliments Missi, meaning he does some of the things that Missi isn't the best at, like having to guard some of the really large 5's in the league like Jokic and Embiid.
I am perfectly fine with DQ/Missi/Karlo and another quality big (like a wendell carter or someone you aren't giving up much of anything for) being our front court for the near future.
If we are going to give up assets, then it should be to go get a top tier wing player.



This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 2:38 pm
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
7153 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

or, and let's use some common fricking sense here, i'd rather get an all-star caliber wing to play with Trey, while Bey comes off the bench

Timeout. Are you creating a random scenario where we trade Zion and then add that $30mil wing?

Nawlins thinks we are worthless so we shouldn't upgrade C.

You think Zion is worthless so instead of upgrading C we should get a Zion replacement.

Here's the problem: Zion is on the team, we aren't trading him, and the plan is to indeed be competitive or make a playoff push.

Both of your opinions have absolutely nothing to do with the current team or plan.

The reality is that Z is staying and we have (1) hole on the team being Center. This thread was about upgrading that player because its our one missing piece.

The thread is NOT about what you think we should do completely irrelevant to what we are actually planning to do.

I guess I should have said "based on what makes sense with the current roster and timeline".

I think we should get Lebron James on the team instead of Hawkins. See I can also give irrelevant opinions that have nothing to do with the current situation at hand.

quote:

Is DQ going to primarily play the 4?

Yes DQ will play the 4.
quote:

if so, why the frick is Zion still on the team?

Because a 22ppg/ 6reb/ 2ast player is better to have than to not have? Plus low trade value.

Are you saying we would be better off with just Queen/ Karlo > Zion/ Queen/ Karlo? There isn't a scenario where we trade Z for that magical player.

You being upset about Zion's existence has absolutely fricking nothing to do with getting an upgraded center.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 5:13 pm
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30867 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

You being upset about Zion's existence has absolutely fricking nothing to do with getting an upgraded center.




I know i wrote a whole bunch of shite, but yes, it does, and it's the point i'm making.
We don't need an upgrade at center.

The only reason YOU thin we need an upgrade at center is to compliment Zion. Under no circumstance should we be roster building around him anymore. He's the problem. Missi is a starting caliber center in the league, and I think he'll continue to get better. I've posted plenty of stats across multiple threads about Missi, DQ and Karlo's defense being better than you think.
WHy do you think Missi isn't good enough to be a good starter? b/c he doesn't shoot 3's? who gives a shite? Maybe the 6'6" fat arse should shoot 3's. It's perfectly normal to have a center who isn't a 3 point threat. It's not normal to have your "best" player not be able to shoot from anywhere other than from under the goal.

A better defense starts with getting rid of the guy who sucks on defense, and who's offense creates fast break opportunities far too often b/c he's either on the ground after a shot or too lazy to get back when he isn't on the ground.



So yeah, this center debate is about Zion, in my opinion.

quote:

Timeout. Are you creating a random scenario where we trade Zion and then add that $30mil wing?


did you create a scenario where we presumably trade Poole and add a $30M center? How else are you expecting to get half the guys you listed? Why can't i want a $30M player?
I don't want to give up assets to demote Missi and DQ to the bench and play less minutes, as well as Karlo.
Upgrading Zion puts us in a better position to win more games than adding some 5 who is on some monster contract on a team he doens't currently help win. Jarrett Allen is the only guy on that list i would be interested in, and to be honest, I think Missi can get to Jarrett Allen's level of play. Allen is what we are hoping Missi becomes, and i think that's very realistic


It seems awfully negative of you to not think Missi can improve even more this year, despite being one of the better defensive 5's in the league last year.





quote:

The thread is NOT about what you think we should do completely irrelevant to what we are actually planning to do.





and you know what we are actually planning to do.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11518 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 6:03 am to
I don't see Queen and Missi playing a ton of minutes together (not yet). Maybe 5-10 minutes a game. So I believe they will split time at Center, with both getting about 25-30mpg. I'm comfortable with extended depth of Jordan and Matkovic. In a pinch, we could possibly get by with Bey or Watford playing some at the 5 (going small).

All that said, I don’t think its a big need unless we are upgrading Missi. Which i don't see unless we trade for Duren. Would he be a good fit with Queen? I'm not sure he would be..
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21289 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Missi is a starting caliber center in the league, and I think he'll continue to get better. I've posted plenty of stats across multiple threads about Missi, DQ and Karlo's defense being better than you think.
WHy do you think Missi isn't good enough to be a good starter?


Missi simply was not a good overall defender last year. Not a strong defensive rebounder at all. I also have high hopes for his improvement (I posted the recent thread about his FIBA play), but that's far from guaranteed.
Posted by Corporal Beavis
Member since Aug 2013
1359 posts
Posted on 8/30/26 at 1:18 pm to
Myles Turner longest tenured hypothetical pel
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21289 posts
Posted on 8/30/26 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Myles Turner longest tenured hypothetical pel


Started when David Griffin tried to trade the #4 pick for him to pair him with Zion.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
41064 posts
Posted on 8/30/26 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Have you ever thought maybe you are just being slightly pessimistic in your overall assessment?


Compared to you? Sure

I actually think we cover our over with ease this year assuming we don’t blow it up at the deadline and tank. I’ve got us around 35 wins, which is a massive improvement all things considered.

I don’t think there is a center we can get that drastically changes that outcome, and based on that conviction, I don’t think giving up a first round pick for any of the guys you listed is a smart move.

You keep protesting as if I’m saying “don’t upgrade” but if the cost of the upgrade is greater than the reward - and I strongly believe that is the case - then I believe it makes more sense to stand pat.

You asking me if I’m pessimistic is silly when: a) not mortgaging future valuable assets for Myles Turner in 2026 is a completely logical thing to believe in; and B) you are the one who has been off on your evaluations of this roster, as you have been aggressively, wildly, over-optimistic in the very recent past.
This post was edited on 8/30/26 at 6:04 pm
Posted by ThePistol
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1830 posts
Posted on 8/30/26 at 7:06 pm to
We have had the worst center rotation in the NBA for the last two years. If we aren’t going to try to upgrade the center position, then we need to trade Zion, Herb, and Trey. We have no chance to be competitive with the worst center rotation in the league. So yes, I think a real NBA center would make a significant impact on this team.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11518 posts
Posted on 8/30/26 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

We have had the worst center rotation in the NBA for the last two years.


I don't think this is true at all. First team to come to mind is the Hawks (since I live in Atlanta). They are playing Okongwu (PF) at Center, who is undersized and limited offensively. Missi isn't as good as him? Who would you rather have?

I get that Queen is a bit undersized as well. But they don't have anybody near as talented as him. As a unit, I'd take ours over them. I'm sure I can make the same argument for a bunch of other teams too.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram